Use of a Simple Appliance to Prevent Mucosal Irritation by the Distractor Rod during Vertical Distraction: Case Report

ABSTRACT

Patient discomfort due to the excessive length of the distractor rod is one of the disadvantages of alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Although this seems to be a minor complication, it can cause severe mucosal irritation on the opposite arch, and uncontrolled forces can lead to the loosening of the screws and the inactivation of the distractor. The purpose of this case report is to introduce an acrylic appliance that is very useful in avoiding the mucosal irritation caused by the long distractrrod. The appliance is simple, effective, and easy to fabricate. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:204-207)

Key Words:

Vertical distraction appliance - Rod - Complication - Irritation

• REFERENCES

• 1 Horiuchi K, Uchida H, Yamamoto K, Hatano N. Anteroinferior distraction of the atrophic subtotalmaxillary alveolus for implant placement: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 416-423
• 2 Urbani G. Alveolar distraction before implantation: A report of five cases and a review of the literature. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21: 569-579
• 3 Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuhlke L, Reed C. Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A prospective 5- year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 52-68
• 4 Raghoebar GM, Heydenrijk K, Vissink A. Vertical distraction of the severely resorbed mandible. The Groningen distraction device. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 29: 416-420
• 5 Garcia-Garcia A, Martin-Somoza M, Gandara-Vila P, Maceiras JL. Minor complications arising in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 496-501
• 6 Hidding J, Lazar F, Zöller JE. Initial outcome of vertical distraction osteogenesis of the atrophic alveolar ridge. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1999; 3: S79-83
• 7 Uckan S, Haydar SG, Dolanmaz D. Alveolar distraction: analysis of 10 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 561-565
• 8 Van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, Perdijk FB, Tuinzing DB. Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiolo Endod 2003; 96: 392-397
• 9 McAllister BS. Histologic and radiographic evidence of vertical ridge augmentation utilizing distraction osteogenesis: 10 consecutively placed distractors. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1767-1779
• 10 Mazzonetto R, Torezan JF. Potential complications during alveolar distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 85
• 11 McAllister BS, Gaffaney TE. Distraction osteogenesis for vertical bone augmentation prior to oral implant reconstruction. Periodontol 2000 2003; 33: 54-66
• 12 Stellingsma C, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Kuiper C, Raghoebar GM. Implantology and the severely resorbed edentulous mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004; 15: 240-248
• 13 de Koomen HA, Stoelinga PJ, Tideman H, Huybers TJ. Interposed bone-graft augmentation of the atrophic mandible (a progress report). J Maxillofac Surg 1979; 7: 129-135
• 14 Stellingsma C, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH. Reconstruction of the extremely resorbed mandible with interposed bone grafts and placement of endosseous implants. A preliminary report on outcome of treatment and patients' satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36: 290-295
• 15 Bianchi A, Felice P, Lizio G, Marchetti C. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus inlay bone grafting in posterior mandibular atrophy: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiolo Endod 2008; 105: 282-292
• 16 Garcia AG, Martin MS, Vila PG, Maceiras JL. Minor complications arising in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 496-501