CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2008; 02(03): 176-184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697375
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Performance of Laser Fluorescence for Residual Caries Detection in Primary Teeth

Taskin Gurbuz
a   Assistant Professor, Department of Pedodontics, Faculty Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
,
Yucel Yilmaz
b   Associate Professor, Department of Pedodontics, Faculty Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
,
Fatih Sengul
c   Research Assistant, Department of Pedodontics, Faculty Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a visual-tactile examination and a laser fluorescence device for detecting residual dentinal caries after carious dentin removal with bur excavation, hand excavation and chemomechanical excavation (Carisolv™].

Methods: Thirty extracted coronal caries primary second molars were used. The caries infected dentin has been removed. A blinded examiner checked all cavities for residual caries using a visualtactile examination and laser fluorescence. Then the teeth were sectioned through the prepared cavities andthe two halves of each tooth were processed for light microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The presence or absence of residual caries was verified using polarized light microscopy as the gold standard. The cavity floor dentin after removing carious dentin was examined using SEM.

Results: In among all groups a significant difference is determined between visual-tactile examination and laser fluorescence (P<.05). There was an agreement between laser fluorescence or visual-tactile examination and histological gold standard (P>.05). In addition, SEM images of the surfaces with the caries removed have shown that a vast majority of the tubule openings is observed to be open in the samples of the Carisolv group in opposition to the other groups.

Conclusions: The laser fluorescence system could be effective in checking the removal by other methods, such as bur or Carisolv and avoid excessive removal of the sound dentin. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:176-184)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: A review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J 2000; 188: 476-482
  • 2 Kuboki Y, Liu CF, Fusayama T. Mechanism of differential staining in carious dentin. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 713-714
  • 3 Fusayama T, Okuse K, Hosoda H. Relationship between hardness, discoloration, and microbial invasion in carious dentin. J Dent Res 1966; 45: 1033-1046
  • 4 Van de Rijke JW. Use of dyes in cariology. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 111-116
  • 5 Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA. The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1994; 176: 417-421
  • 6 Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 14-19
  • 7 Iwami Y, Shimizu A, Hayashi M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Relationship between colors of carious dentin and laser fluorescence evaluations in caries diagnosis. Dent Mater J 2006; 25: 584-590
  • 8 Mendes FM, Hissadomi M, Imparato JC. Effects of drying time and the presence of plaque on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence in occlusal caries of primary teeth. Caries Res 2004; 38: 104-148
  • 9 Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gokalp S. The in vitro performance of laser fluorescence and caries-detector dye for detecting residual carious dentin during tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 2005; 36: 417-422
  • 10 Lennon AM, Buchalla W, Switalski L, Stookey GK. Residual caries detection using visible fluorescence. Caries Res 2002; 36: 315-319
  • 11 Lozano-Chourio MA, Zambrano O, Gonzalez H, Quero M. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv). Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16: 161-167
  • 12 Splieth C, Rosin M, Gellissen B. Determination of residual dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Clin Oral Invest 2001; 5: 250-253
  • 13 Yazici AR, Atilla P, Ozgunaltay G, Muftuoglu S. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 1177-1172
  • 14 Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Tamaki Y, Yamada Y, Jayavardena JA, Matsumoto K. Dentinal composition and knoop hardness measurements of cavity floor following carious dentin removal with Carisolv. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 346-341
  • 15 König K, Flemming G, Hibst R. Laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy of dental caries. Cell Mol Biol 1998; 44: 1293-1300
  • 16 Lussi A, Hibst R, Paulus R. DIAGNOdent: an optical method for caries detection. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 80-83
  • 17 Lussi A, Francescut P. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth. Caries Res 2003; 37: 2-7
  • 18 Anttonen V, Seppä L, Hausen H. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children. Caries Res 2003; 37: 17-23
  • 19 Mendes FM, Siqueira WL, Mazzitelli JF, Pinheiro SL, Bengtson AL. Performance of DIAGNOdent® for detection and quantification of smooth-surface caries in primary teeth. J Dent 2005; 33: 79-74
  • 20 Iwami Y, Shimizu A, Narimatsu M, Hayashi M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Relationship between bacterial infection and evaluation using a laser fluorescence device, DIAGNOdent. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 419-423
  • 21 Suzaki A, Takahashi K, Sakuma K, Arimoto N, Senda A, Hayakava T. A fundamental study on clinical application of DIAGNOdent -Effects of demineralization and collagenase treatment of bovine dentin on the defective response of DIAGNOdent™. Jpn J Conser Dent 2000; 43: 200-207
  • 22 Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW, Goto G. Influence of CarisolvTM for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent 2001; 29: 163-171
  • 23 Hosoya Y, Taguchi T, Tay FR. Evaluation of a new caries detecting dye for primary and permanent carious dentin. J Dent 2007; 35: 137-143
  • 24 Krause F, Braun A, Eberhard J, Jepsen J. Laser fluorescence measurements compared to electrical resistance of residual dentine in excavated cavities in vivo. Caries Res 2007; 41: 135-140
  • 25 Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Hossain M, Kinoshita J, Shimizu Y, Matsumoto K. Caries removal with Carisolv system: Criteria evaluation and microleakage test. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 30: 121-126
  • 26 Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A. Detection of occlusal caries by laser fluorescence: basic and clinical investigations. Med Laser Appl 2001; 16: 205-213
  • 27 Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. J Dent 2000; 28: 179-186
  • 28 Peric T, Markovic D. In vitro effectiveness of a chemo- mechanical method for caries removal. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2007; 8: 61-67
  • 29 Flückiger L, Waltimo T, Stich H, Lussi A. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv™ or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro. J Dent 2005; 33: 87-90
  • 30 Iwami Y, Shimizu A, Yamamoto H, Hayashi M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. In vitro study of caries detection through sound dentin using a laser fluorescence device, DIAGNOdent. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 7-11