Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2008; 02(01): 63-68
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697356
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Intraoral Repair of All Ceramic Fixed Partial Denture Utilizing Preimpregnated Fiber Reinforced Composite

Süha Turkaslan
a   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
,
Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay
b   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry & Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

All ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPD)s exhibit enhanced biocompatibility and esthetics as compared to metal-ceramic restorations. However, framework fractures are frequently reported especially when the connector dimensions are inadequate to withstand the high tensile stresses. The repair of the failed connector would be desirable rather than the complete removal and renewal since the latter is an expensive and time consuming procedure. Furthermore, the replacement or removal of the restoration for extra-oral repair purposes might increase the risk of destroying the entire restoration or damaging the abutment teeth during the removal. This article presents a direct intra-oral method that may be used to repair the connector fractures of all-ceramic FPDs which are otherwise clinically satisfactory. In the present technique, the connector is reconstructed intraorally utilizing composite resin restorative material reinforced with E-glass-fiber. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:63-68)

Key words:

Fixed partial denture - All-ceramic - Fiber-reinforced composite - Intra-oral repair - Fracture
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 433-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ. Cyclic fatigue in water of veneer-framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 177-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lüthy H, Filser F, Loeffel O, Schumacher M, Gauckler LJ, Hammerle CHF. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 930-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sorensen JA, Knode H, Torres TJ. In-ceram all-ceramic bridge technology. Quintessence Dent Technol 1992; 15: 41-46
    Google Scholar
  • 5 McLaren EA. All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 307-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT, Raffeiner O, Meredith HR, Foser HP. A clinical investigation on three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated with a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Pract Peridont Aesthet Dent 1999; 11: 95-106
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ. The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 520-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Goldberg AJ, Freilich MA. An innovative pre-impregnated glass fiber for reinforcing composites. Dent Clin North Am 1999; 43: 127-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 VaLLittu PK. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the fracture resistance of a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 125-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vallittu PK. Use of woven glass fibres to reinforce a composite veneer. A fracture resistance and acoustic emission study. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 423-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. Repair bond strength of restorative resin composite to fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62: 51-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ozcan M, vander Sleen JM, Kurunmaki H, Vallittu PK. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic-fused-to-metal crowns. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 283-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spikermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 231-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1253-1258
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Appleby DC. Repair of fractured connectors in a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 84: 449-450
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Galiatsatos AA. An indirect repair technique for fractured metal-ceramic restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 321-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bertolotti RL, Lacy AM, Watanabe LG. Adhesive monomers for porcelain repair. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 483-489
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 119-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Barreto MT, Bottaro BF. A practical approach to porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 349-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chung K, Hwang Y. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair system with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 267-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 6-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cardoso AC, Spinelli Filho P.. Clinical and laboratory techniques for repair of fractured porcelain in fixed prostheses: a case report. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 835-838
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kim BK, Bae HEK, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 357-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 EUakwa AE, ShortaLL AC, Marquis PM. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 485-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 VaLLittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 318-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dyer SR, Lassila LV, Jokinen M, Vallittu PK. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 947-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Karmaker A, Prasad A. Effect of design parameters on the flexural properties of fibre-reinforced composites. J Mater SciLett 2000; 19: 663-665
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Li W, Swain MV, Li Q, Ironside J, Steven GP. Fiber reinforced dental bridge Part I: experimental investigation. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4987-4993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli and x-ray fiffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 374-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 29-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fennis WM, Tezvergil A, Kuijs RH, Lassila LV, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Vallittu PK. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 565-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The shear bond strength of bidirectional and random-oriented fiber-reinforced composite to tooth structure. J Dent 2005; 33: 509-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar