CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2008; 02(01): 18-22
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697348
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Prevalence of Styloid Process Elongation on Panoramic Radiography in the Turkey Population from Cappadocia Region

Cumali Gokce
a   Dr., Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
,
Yildiray Sisman
b   Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
,
Elif Tarim Ertas
c   Research Assistant, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
,
Faruk Akgunlu
d   Professor, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
,
Ahmet Ozturk
e   Dr., Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of styloid process elongation (SPE) detected on panoramic radiographs (PRs) in Cappadocia region population in Turkey and to investigate the SPE incidences in relation to the age subgroups.

Methods: Between 2004 to 2007 years, a random sample of 750 PRs was collected from the data files and any questionable PR was excluded. Therefore, 698 PRs were included in the present study. The subjects were divided into six age subgroups: 10–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59 and 60 years and older. Fifty-four (7.7%) patients demonstrated SPE at least one side.

Results: There were statistical differences between 10-19, 20-29 age subgroups and 30-39, 5059 age subgroups in terms of the SPE prevalence, but not other subgroups. Conclusions: According to our knowledge, this is the highest prevalence in comparison to the other Turkish reports and the first study in terms of the SPE prevalence in Cappadocia region population. Also, the subgroup analyse suggested that the age may not have a role in the elongation of the SP. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:18-22)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 GöziL R, Yener N, Calgüner E, Araç M, Tunç E, Bahcelioḡlu M. Morphological characteristics of styloid process evaluated by computerized axial tomography. Ann Anat 2001; 183: 527-535
  • 2 Krennmair G, Piehslinger E. Variants of ossification in the stylohyoid chain. Cranio 2003; 21: 31-37
  • 3 Camarda AJ, Deschamps C, Forest II D. Stylohyoid chain ossification: a discussion of etiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67: 515-520
  • 4 Prasad KC, Kamath MP, Reddy KJ, Raju K, Agarwal S. Elongated styloid process (Eagle’s syndrome): a clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 171-175
  • 5 Monsour PA, Young WG. Variability of the styloid process and stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61: 522-526
  • 6 Ilguy M, Ilguy D, Guler N, Bayirli G. Incidence of the type and calcification patterns in patients with elongated styloid process. J Int Med Res 2005; 33: 96-102
  • 7 Kursoglu P, Unalan F, Erdem T. Radiological evaluation of the styloid process in young adults resident in Turkey’s Yeditepe University faculty of dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Oral Endod 2005; 100: 491-494
  • 8 Jung T, Tschernitschek H, Hippen H, Schneider B, Borchers L. Elongated styloid process: when is it really elongated?. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 119-124
  • 9 Zaki HS, Greco CM, Rudy TE, Kubinski JA. Elongated styloid process in a temporomandibular disorder sample: prevalence and treatment outcome. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 399-405
  • 10 Ramadan SU, Gokharman D, Tuncbilek I, Kacar M, Kosar P, Kosar U. Assessment of the stylohoid chain by 3D-CT. Surg Radiol Anat 2007; 29: 583-588
  • 11 Eagle WW. Elongated styloid process. Report of two cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1937; 25: 548-587
  • 12 Bafaqeeh SA. Eagle syndrome: classic and carotid artery types. J Otolaryngol 2000; 29: 88-94
  • 13 Chuang WC, Short JH, McKinney AM, Anker L, Knoll B, McKinney ZJ. Reversible left hemispheric ischemia secondary to carotid compression in Eagle syndrome: surgical and CT angiographic correlation. Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 143-145
  • 14 Murtagh RD, Caracciolo JT, Fernandez G. CT findings associated with Eagle syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1401-1402
  • 15 Rechtweg JS, Wax MK. Eagle’s syndrome: a review. Am J Otolaryngol 1998; 19: 316-321
  • 16 Okabe S, Morimoto Y, Ansai T. et al. Clinical significance and variation of the advanced calcified stylohyoid complex detected by panoramic radiographs among 80-year-old subjects. DentomaxillofacRadiol 2006; 35: 191-199
  • 17 Eagle WW. Elongated styloid process, further observations and a new syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol 1948; 47: 630-640
  • 18 Aral IL, Karaca I, Güngör N. Eagle’s syndrome masquerading as pain of dental origin. Case report. Aust Dent J 1997; 42: 18-19
  • 19 Keur JJ, Campbell JP, McCarthy JF. The clinical significance of the elongated styloid process. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61: 399-404
  • 20 Bozkir MG, Boḡa H, Dere F. The evaluation of elongated styloid process in panoramic radiographs in edentulous patients. Tr. J. of Medical Science 1999; 29: 481-485
  • 21 Grossman JR, Tarsitano JJ. The styloid-stylohyoid syndrome. J Oral Surg 1977; 35: 555-560
  • 22 Erol B. Radiological assessment of elongated styloid process and ossified stylohyoid ligament. Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty 1996; 2: 554-556
  • 23 Correlly RW, Jensen JL, Taylor JB, Rhyne RR. Mineralization of the stylohyoid-stylomandibular ligament complex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979; 48: 286-291