PDF herunterladen
Semin Thromb Hemost 2020; 46(03): 238-244
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696943
Review Article

Platelet Transfusion Thresholds: How Low Can We Go in Respect to Platelet Counting?

Giuseppe Lippi
1   Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
,
Emmanuel J. Favaloro
2   Department of Haematology, Sydney Centres for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), NSW Health Pathology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
,
Sabrina Buoro
3   Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Platelet transfusion is conventionally used to prevent or treat bleeding in patients with low platelet counts or impaired platelet function. The identification of accurate thresholds of platelet count for guiding platelet transfusion practices is a crucial aspect in health care to prevent adverse events, side effects, unwarranted costs for the health care service, and deprivation of supplies. This article is therefore aimed at providing a narrative overview on current guidelines and recommendations for platelet transfusion across many clinical settings, including platelet function disorders, and critically analyzing the available platelet transfusion thresholds according to the current analytical performance of platelet counting with automated hematological analyzers. Overall, universal agreement on the definition of platelet transfusion thresholds has not been reached. The degree of accuracy and imprecision of many fully automated hematological analyzers appears also unsatisfactory, especially at the lower thrombocytopenic range, and this may thus jeopardize the managed care of patients who are candidates for platelet transfusions. Potential solutions to overcome the current shortcomings of automated platelet counting are also discussed, encompassing the use of alternative tests for guiding platelet transfusion (e.g., thrombin generation assays or thromboelastography) along with innovative approaches for platelet enumeration (e.g., fluorescent labeling and flow cytometry).

Keywords

platelets - transfusion - bleeding - imprecision - inaccuracy


Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
28. September 2019 (online)

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Stroncek DF, Rebulla P. Platelet transfusions. Lancet 2007; 370 (9585): 427-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sharma S, Sharma P, Tyler LN. Transfusion of blood and blood products: indications and complications. Am Fam Physician 2011; 83 (06) 719-724
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Annen K, Olson JE. Optimizing platelet transfusions. Curr Opin Hematol 2015; 22 (06) 559-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blumberg N, Heal JM, Phillips GL. Platelet transfusions: trigger, dose, benefits, and risks. F1000 Med Rep 2010; 2: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Spiess BD. Platelet transfusions: the science behind safety, risks and appropriate applications. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2010; 24 (01) 65-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Refaai MA, Phipps RP, Spinelli SL, Blumberg N. Platelet transfusions: impact on hemostasis, thrombosis, inflammation and clinical outcomes. Thromb Res 2011; 127 (04) 287-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schmidt AE, Refaai MA, Blumberg N. Platelet transfusion and thrombosis: more questions than answers. Semin Thromb Hemost 2016; 42 (02) 118-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Liumbruno G, Bennardello F, Lattanzio A, Piccoli P, Rossetti G. Italian Society of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology (SIMTI) Work Group. Recommendations for the transfusion of plasma and platelets. Blood Transfus 2009; 7 (02) 132-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Biscoping J. Therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives: the current cross-sectional guidelines [in German]. Anaesthesist 2009; 58 (11) 1083-1084
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kaufman RM, Djulbegovic B, Gernsheimer T. et al; AABB. Platelet transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162 (03) 205-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Estcourt LJ, Birchall J, Allard S. et al; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions. Br J Haematol 2017; 176 (03) 365-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lin Y, Foltz LM. Proposed guidelines for platelet transfusion. B C Med J 2005; 47 (05) 245-248
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 World Health Organization. Clinical transfusion practice: guidelines for medical interns. Accessed January 17, 2019 at: https://www.who.int/bloodsafety/transfusion_services/ClinicalTransfusionPracticeGuidelinesforMedicalInternsBangladesh.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 American Red Cross. A compendium of transfusion practice guidelines. 3rd ed. 2017 . Accessed January 17, 2019 at: http://success.redcross.org/success/file.php/1/TransfusionPractices-Compendium_3rdEdition.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lieberman L, Bercovitz RS, Sholapur NS, Heddle NM, Stanworth SJ, Arnold DM. Platelet transfusions for critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia. Blood 2014; 123 (08) 1146-1151 , quiz 1280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Curley A, Stanworth SJ, Willoughby K. et al; PlaNeT2 MATISSE Collaborators. Randomized trial of platelet-transfusion thresholds in neonates. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (03) 242-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 International Council for Standardization in Haematology Expert Panel on Cytometry; International Society of Laboratory Hematology Task Force on Platelet Counting. Platelet counting by the RBC/platelet ratio method. A reference method. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115 (03) 460-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Harrison P, Ault KA, Chapman S. et al; International Society of Laboratory Hematology Task Force for the Reference Platelet Count. An interlaboratory study of a candidate reference method for platelet counting. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115 (03) 448-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Briggs C, Harrison P, Machin SJ. Continuing developments with the automated platelet count. Int J Lab Hematol 2007; 29 (02) 77-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Buoro S, Lippi G. Harmonization of laboratory hematology: a long and winding journey. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56 (10) 1575-1578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lippi G, Pavesi F, Pipitone S. Evaluation of mean platelet volume with four hematological analyzers: harmonization is still an unresolved issue. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2015; 26 (02) 235-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Boulassel MR, Al-Farsi R, Al-Hashmi S, Al-Riyami H, Khan H, Al-Kindi S. Accuracy of platelet counting by optical and impedance methods in patients with thrombocytopaenia and microcytosis. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2015; 15 (04) e463-e468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pan LL, Chen CM, Huang WT, Sun CK. Enhanced accuracy of optical platelet counts in microcytic anemia. Lab Med 2014; 45 (01) 32-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Buoro S, Seghezzi M, Manenti B. et al. Biological variation of platelet parameters determined by the Sysmex XN hematology analyzer. Clin Chim Acta 2017; 470: 125-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vis JY, Huisman A. Verification and quality control of routine hematology analyzers. Int J Lab Hematol 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) 100-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Segal HC, Briggs C, Kunka S. et al. Accuracy of platelet counting haematology analysers in severe thrombocytopenia and potential impact on platelet transfusion. Br J Haematol 2005; 128 (04) 520-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bowles KM, Bloxham DM, Perry DJ, Baglin TP. Discrepancy between impedance and immunofluorescence platelet counting has implications for clinical decision making in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura. Br J Haematol 2006; 134 (03) 320-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Trabuio E, Valverde S, Antico F, Manoni F, Gessoni G. Performance of automated platelet quantification using different analysers in comparison with an immunological reference method in thrombocytopenic patients. Blood Transfus 2009; 7 (01) 43-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hong KH, Kim MJ, Lee KW, Park KU, Kim HS, Song J. Platelet count evaluation using three automated haematology analysers compared with the immunoplatelet reference method, and estimation of possible inadequate platelet transfusion. Int J Lab Hematol 2009; 31 (03) 298-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 De la Salle BJ, McTaggart PN, Briggs C. et al. The accuracy of platelet counting in thrombocytopenic blood samples distributed by the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for General Haematology. Am J Clin Pathol 2012; 137 (01) 65-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lozano M, Mahon A, van der Meer PF. et al; Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Counting platelets at transfusion threshold levels: impact on the decision to transfuse. A BEST Collaborative - UK NEQAS(H) International Exercise. Vox Sang 2014; 106 (04) 330-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Zandecki M, Genevieve F, Gerard J, Godon A. Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part I: platelets. Int J Lab Hematol 2007; 29 (01) 4-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kim SY, Kim JE, Kim HK, Han KS, Toh CH. Accuracy of platelet counting by automated hematologic analyzers in acute leukemia and disseminated intravascular coagulation: potential effects of platelet activation. Am J Clin Pathol 2010; 134 (04) 634-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lippi G, Plebani M. EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia: further insights and recommendations for prevention of a clinically threatening artifact. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50 (08) 1281-1285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 van der Meer W, MacKenzie MA, Dinnissen JW, de Keijzer MH. Pseudoplatelets: a retrospective study of their incidence and interference with platelet counting. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56 (10) 772-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Frotscher B, Salignac S, Muller M, Latger-Cannard V, Feugier P, Lesesve JF. Interference of blast cell fragments with automated platelet counting. Int J Lab Hematol 2015; 37 (05) 613-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Buoro S, Manenti B, Seghezzi M. et al. Abnormal scattergrams and cell population data generated by fully automated hematological analyzers: New tools for screening malaria infection?. Int J Lab Hematol 2018; 40 (03) 326-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 von Ahsen N, Ehrlich B, Scott CS, Riggert J, Oellerich M. Cryoglobulins interfere with platelet counts by optical and impedance methods but not with the CD61 immunoplatelet count. Clin Chem 2001; 47 (10) 1858-1860
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Whyte CS, Mitchell JL, Mutch NJ. Platelet-mediated modulation of fibrinolysis. Semin Thromb Hemost 2017; 43 (02) 115-128
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. Laboratory hemostasis: from biology to the bench. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56 (07) 1035-1045
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. Venous and arterial thromboses: two sides of the same coin?. Semin Thromb Hemost 2018; 44 (03) 239-248
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Friedmann AM, Sengul H, Lehmann H, Schwartz C, Goodman S. Do basic laboratory tests or clinical observations predict bleeding in thrombocytopenic oncology patients? A reevaluation of prophylactic platelet transfusions. Transfus Med Rev 2002; 16 (01) 34-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Cauwenberghs S, Feijge MA, Theunissen E, Heemskerk JW, van Pampus EC, Curvers J. Novel methodology for assessment of prophylactic platelet transfusion therapy by measuring increased thrombus formation and thrombin generation. Br J Haematol 2007; 136 (03) 480-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kim SY, Gu JY, Yoo HJ. et al. Benefits of thromboelastography and thrombin generation assay for bleeding prediction in patients with thrombocytopenia or hematologic malignancies. Ann Lab Med 2017; 37 (06) 484-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Gatt A, Bonello F, Buttigieg R. et al. Flow cytometry and thromboelastography to assess platelet counts and coagulation in patients with haematological malignancies. Blood Transfus 2014; 12 (04) 479-484
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Uhl L, Assmann SF, Hamza TH, Harrison RW, Gernsheimer T, Slichter SJ. Laboratory predictors of bleeding and the effect of platelet and RBC transfusions on bleeding outcomes in the PLADO trial. Blood 2017; 130 (10) 1247-1258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Schoorl M, Schoorl M, Oomes J, van Pelt J. New fluorescent method (PLT-F) on Sysmex XN2000 hematology analyzer achieved higher accuracy in low platelet counting. Am J Clin Pathol 2013; 140 (04) 495-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Tanaka Y, Tanaka Y, Gondo K. et al. Performance evaluation of platelet counting by novel fluorescent dye staining in the XN-series automated hematology analyzers. J Clin Lab Anal 2014; 28 (05) 341-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Buoro S, Mecca T, Seghezzi M. et al. Analytical comparison between two hematological analyzer systems: CAL-8000 vs. XN-9000. Int J Lab Hematol 2017; 39 (02) 147-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Wada A, Takagi Y, Kono M, Morikawa T. Accuracy of a new platelet count system (PLT-F) depends on the staining property of its reagents. PLoS One 2015; 10 (10) e0141311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar