CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2019; 52(02): 178-182
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696634
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Nasendoscopic Findings of Velopharyngeal Sphincter in Operated Cleft Palate Patients: Is It Different than Normal Population

Akangsha Sharma
1   Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Shamendra Anand Sahu
2   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Karoon Agrawal
3   Department of Burns, Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Safdarjung Hospital and VMMC, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 September 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed for nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal sphinteric closure in patients with operated cleft palate and to compare it with normal population.

Design A cross-sectional study was done in a tertiary cleft care center in 30 patients with operated cleft palate after a minimum of 6 months of their surgery and 30 randomly selected volunteers with normal speech. Both groups were one-time evaluated by three observers using 70 degree rigid nasendoscope and/or pediatric fiber optic endoscope. Velopharyngeal sphincter closure characteristics in terms of pattern of closure, dominant element involved in the closure, degree of palatal movement, and completeness of the closure were evaluated, recorded, and compared between the groups.

Results In both groups, the most common pattern of closure is coronal and soft palate is the dominant mobile element in velopharyngeal closure. All normal subjects showed complete closure of the sphincter with good soft palate movement. But only 50% of the operated patients with cleft showed complete closure and even less than them had good movements of the soft palate.

Conclusions Although the pattern of the closure in the operated patients is similar to the normal subjects, the movement of the soft palate and completeness of the velopharyngeal sphincter closure still remain the problem in the operated palate patients.

 
  • References

  • 1 Perry JL. Anatomy and physiology of the velopharyngeal mechanism. Semin Speech Lang 2011; 32 (02) 83-92
  • 2 Marsh JL. Velo-pharyngeal dysfunction: evaluation and management. Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42 (Suppl): S129-S136
  • 3 Croft CB, Shprintzen RJ, Rakoff SJ. Patterns of velopharyngeal valving in normal and cleft palate subjects: a multi-view videofluoroscopic and nasendoscopic study. Laryngoscope 1981; 91 (02) 265-271
  • 4 Woo AS. Velopharyngeal dysfunction. Semin Plast Surg 2012; 26 (04) 170-177
  • 5 Sagar P, Nimkin K. Feasibility study to assess clinical applications of 3-T cine MRI coupled with synchronous audio recording during speech in evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children. PediatrRadio 2015; 45 (02) 217-227
  • 6 Subramani SA, Murthy BS. A classification of cranio facio cervical (branchial) clefts (Bangalore classification). Indian J PlastSurg 2005; 38 (02) 79-94
  • 7 Manochiopining S, Chuangsuwanich A, Taweepraditpol S. The nasendoscopic study of velopharyngeal closure patterns in normal thai volunteers. Siriraj Med J 2005; 5: 118-121
  • 8 Igawa HH, Nishizawa N, Sugihara T, Inuyama Y. A fiberscopic analysis of velopharyngeal movement before and after primary palatoplasty in cleft palate infants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 668-674
  • 9 Matsuya T, Yamaoka M, Miyasaki T. A fiberscopic study of velopharyngeal closure in patients with operated cleft palates. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63 (04) 497-500
  • 10 Yellinedi R, Damalacheruvu MR. Is there an optimal resting velopharyngeal gap in operated cleft palate patients?. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (01) 87-91