Optimising Results of Nasal Tip Rotation Applying Combination of Nasolabial Angle and Lip–Columellar Angle in Tandem in Patients Operated by “Cock-up” Alar Cartilage Flaps Technique

Abstract

Background Setting the angle of tip rotation is of utmost importance in achieving satisfactory results in rhinoplasty. Conventionally the upward rotation of the tip requires shortening of the septum by caudal resection and shortening of the lateral walls by cephalic trim of the alar cartilages. The results are usually assessed subjectively. We describe the use of objective parameters to ensure accuracy of nasal tip rotation in patients operated with “cock-up” alar cartilage flaps, a modification of the cephalic trim.

Methods Fifteen patients with a long nose having adequate width of lateral crura, desiring a shorter nose with upward tip rotation, were included in the study. Values of preoperative and desired nasolabial angle (from morphed images), and the derived columellar–labial angle were documented. Nasal tip rotation was set to the derived angle and maintained using cock-up alar cartilage flaps. The outcome was evaluated by digital measurements of the nasolabial angle and patients’ feedback by Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) score.

Results Satisfactory tip rotation and an aesthetic supratip area could be achieved. The difference in preoperative and postoperative nasolabial angles was statistically significant (p value < 0.0001). The difference in desired and the obtained nasolabial angle was not significant (p value 0.085). The results were maintained on subsequent follow-up.

Conclusion Application of angles in practice and use of K-wire template helps us achieve accurate and consistent results. Cock-up flap is an effective technique—to obtain an open nasolabial angle and a desirable supratip region by making use of tissues otherwise discarded.

Keywords

nasal tip rotation - alar cartilage flaps - nasolabial angle

• References

• 1 Gruber RP. Nasal proportions. In Gruber RP, Peck GC. Rhinoplasty: State of the Art. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 1993: 13-28
• 2 Lehocky BE. Anthropometry and cephalometric facial analysis. In Mathes SJ. Plastic Surgery, Volume II—The Head and Neck, Part 1. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2010: 22-26
• 3 Rodriguez E, Losee J, Neligan PC. Nasal analysis and anatomy. In Pessa JE, Rohrich RJ. Plastic Surgery 3rd edition, Volume 2–Aesthetic Surgery. Elsevier; 2012: 373-386
• 4 Gunter JP, Hackney FL. Basic nasal tip surgery: anatomy and technique. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams Jr WP. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2002: 193-218
• 5 Rohrich RJ, Kurkjian TJ, Hoxworth RE, Stephan PJ, Mojallal A. The effect of the columellar strut graft on nasal tip position in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 
926-932
• 6 Tasman AJ, Lohuis PJ. Control of tip rotation. Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28 (02) 243-250
• 7 Bohluli B, Varedi P, Nazari S, Bagheri SC. Lateral crural suspension flap: a novel technique to modify and stabilize the nasolabial angle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (09) 1572-1576
• 8 Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000; 24 (03) 192-197
• 9 Thomsen J, Balle V, Tos M. Modified Kazanjian flying wings procedure. In Jugo SB. Rhinology: A State of the Art—Proceedings of the Xvth Congress of the European Rhinologic Society and the Xiiith International Symposium. Copenhagen, Denmark: Kugler Publications; 1995: 169-172
• 10 Bhat U, Patel B. Primary rhinoplasty: an Indian perspective. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41 (Suppl) S9-S19
• 11 Simons RL. Nasal tip projection, ptosis, and supratip thickening. Ear Nose Throat J 1982; 61 (08) 452-455
• 12 Kuran I, Öreroğlu AR, Efendioğlu K. The lateral crural rein flap: a novel technique for management of tip rotation in primary rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (07) 1008-1017