RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694775
The Association between Advanced Maternal Age and Diagnosis of Small for Gestational Age
Funding This publication was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), through grant number UL1TR001436. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.Publikationsverlauf
05. Mai 2019
04. Juli 2019
Publikationsdatum:
20. August 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ajp/202001/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0039-1694775_190253-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objectives To identify whether advanced maternal age (AMA), defined as age ≥35 years old, is independently associated with small for gestational age (SGA).
Study Design This was a retrospective cohort of births from the National Vital Statistics System in the United States from 2009 to 2013. Women were categorized based on four age groups at the time of delivery: 20 to 29, 30 to 34, 35 to 39, and ≥40 years old. The primary outcome of SGA < 10th and SGA < 5th percentiles was compared between the four groups using both univariable and multivariable analyses to determine whether maternal age was associated with SGA independent of parity.
Results A total of 17,031,005 births were eligible for analysis, with 2,705,501 births to AMA women. In multivariable analyses, maternal age of 30 to 34, compared with 20 to 29, was associated with lower rates of SGA < 10th and <5th percentiles (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95–0.96 and aOR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96–0.98, respectively). The AMA of 35 to 39, compared with 20 to 29, was associated with lower rates of SGA < 10th percentile and unchanged rates of SGA < 5th percentile (aOR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96–0.98 and aOR = 1; 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, respectively). In contrast, AMA of ≥40, compared with age 20 to 29, was associated with higher rates of both SGA < 10th and <5th percentiles (aOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04–1.07 and aOR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.12–1.16, respectively). A significant association was found between maternal age and parity toward the risk of SGA (p < 0.001). Nulliparous women ≥30 years old but not multiparous women had higher rates of SGA < 10th and SGA < 5th percentiles compared with nulliparous women in the age group of 20 to 29. In contrast, both nulliparous and multiparous women age ≥40 years old had an increased risk for SGA < 5th percentile compared with all women in the age group of 20 to 29.
Conclusion Nulliparous women aged 30 years and older have higher risk of SGA < 10th and SGA < 5th percentiles compared with nulliparous women age 20 to 29. In contrast, both nulliparous and multiparous women age 40 years and older have an increased risk of SGA < 5th percentile compared with all women in the age group of 20 to 29.
Condensation
The frequency of SGA was statistically significantly higher in nulliparous women ≥30 years old and in all women ≥40 years old, compared with women in the age group of 20 to 29.
Note
This study was presented in the poster format at the 39th annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, February 11 to 16, 2019.
-
References
- 1 Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000–2014. NCHS Data Brief 2016; 232 (232) 1-8
- 2 National Vital Statistics Reports. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_08-508.pdf . Accessed May 3, 2019
- 3 Shan D, Qiu PY, Wu YX. , et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women of advanced maternal age: a retrospective cohort study from China. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 12239
- 4 Kahveci B, Melekoglu R, Evruke IC, Cetin C. The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18 (01) 343
- 5 Walker KF, Bradshaw L, Bugg GJ, Thornton JG. Causes of antepartum stillbirth in women of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 197: 86-90
- 6 Yogev Y, Melamed N, Bardin R, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Ben-Shitrit G, Ben-Haroush A. Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (06) 558.e1-558.e7
- 7 Berkowitz GS, Skovron ML, Lapinski RH, Berkowitz RL. Delayed childbearing and the outcome of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1990; 322 (10) 659-664
- 8 Cnattingius S, Forman MR, Berendes HW, Isotalo L. Delayed childbearing and risk of adverse perinatal outcome. A population-based study. JAMA 1992; 268 (07) 886-890
- 9 Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O'Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One 2013; 8 (02) e56583
- 10 Prysak M, Lorenz RP, Kisly A. Pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women 35 years and older. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85 (01) 65-70
- 11 Odibo AO, Nelson D, Stamilio DM, Sehdev HM, Macones GA. Advanced maternal age is an independent risk factor for intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Perinatol 2006; 23 (05) 325-328
- 12 Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, De Backer G, Temmerman M. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 135 (01) 41-46
- 13 Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL, Heazell AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12 (10) e0186287
- 14 Tough SC, Newburn-Cook C, Johnston DW, Svenson LW, Rose S, Belik J. Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery. Pediatrics 2002; 109 (03) 399-403
- 15 Goisis A, Remes H, Barclay K, Martikainen P, Myrskylä M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Am J Epidemiol 2017; 186 (11) 1219-1226
- 16 Ludford I, Scheil W, Tucker G, Grivell R. Pregnancy outcomes for nulliparous women of advanced maternal age in South Australia, 1998–2008. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52 (03) 235-241
- 17 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (02) e97-e109
- 18 Schoendorf KC, Branum AM. The use of United States vital statistics in perinatal and obstetric research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194 (04) 911-915
- 19 Peng R, Yang J, Xie HN, Lin MF, Zheng J. Chromosomal and subchromosomal anomalies associated to small for gestational age fetuses with no additional structural anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37 (12) 1219-1224
- 20 Duryea EL, Hawkins JS, McIntire DD, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. A revised birth weight reference for the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (01) 16-22
- 21 Shoham-Vardi I, Leiberman JR, Kopernik G. The association of primiparity with intrauterine growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994; 53 (02) 95-101
- 22 Shah PS. ; Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of LBW/PT births. Parity and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89 (07) 862-875
- 23 Blomberg M, Birch Tyrberg R, Kjølhede P. Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: a Swedish Medical Birth Register Study. BMJ Open 2014; 4 (11) e005840
- 24 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2, Pt 1): 451-461
- 25 Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. ; Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 1070-1082