J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36(01): 028-031
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694757
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The All but Forgotten Mascagni–Sappey Pathway: Learning from Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction

Anna Rose Johnson
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Miguel G. Bravo
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Ted A. James
2   Department of Surgery/Breast Care Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Hiroo Suami
3   Australian Lymphoedema Education, Research and Treatment, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
,
Bernard T. Lee
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Dhruv Singhal
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

18 March 2019

21 June 2019

Publication Date:
09 August 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Upper extremity lymphedema occurs in 25 to 40% of patients after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) or the lymphatic micro- surgical preventative healing approach has demonstrated a significant decrease in postoperative rates of lymphedema (LE) from 4 to 12%. Our objective was to map the Mascagni -Sappey pathway, the lateral upper arm draining lymphatics, in patients undergoing ILR to better characterize the drainage pattern of this lymphosome to the axilla.

Methods A retrospective review of our institutional lymphatic database was conducted and consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing ILR were identified from November 2017 through June 2018. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and intraoperative records were retrieved and analyzed.

Results Twenty-nine consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent ILR after ALND were identified. Patients had a mean age of 54.6years and body mass index (BMI) of 26.6 kg/m2. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was injected at the medial upper arm and isosulfan blue was injected at the cephalic vein, or lateral upper arm, prior to ALND. After ALND, an average 2.5 divided lymphatics were identified, and a mean 1.2 lymphatics were bypassed. In all patients, divided FITC lymphatics were identified. However, in only three patients (10%), divided blue lymphatics were identified after ALND.

Conclusion In this study, variable drainage of the lateral upper arm to the axillary bed was noted. This study is the first to provide a description of intraoperative findings, demonstrating variable drainage patterns of upper extremity lymphatics to the axilla. Moreover, we noted that the lateral- and medial-upper arm lymphosomes have mutually exclusive pathways draining to the axilla. Further study of lymphatic anatomy variability may elucidate the pathophysiology of lymphedema development and influence approaches to immediate lymphatic reconstruction.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F. , et al. Lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach: a new technique for primary prevention of arm lymphedema after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (03) 703-708
  • 2 Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F. , et al. Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for primary surgical prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: over 4 years follow-up. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (06) 421-424
  • 3 Feldman S, Bansil H, Ascherman J. , et al. Single institution experience with lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) for the primary prevention of lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (10) 3296-3301
  • 4 Hahamoff M, Gupta N, Munoz D. , et al. A lymphedema surveillance program for breast cancer patients reveals the promise of surgical prevention. J Surg Res 2018; 0 (00) S0022-4804(17)30662-5
  • 5 Sappey MPC, Karmanski A, Beau E, Bry A. Anatomie, Physiologie, Pathologie de Vaisseaux Lymphatiques. Paris: Adrain Delahaye, Imprimerie de E. Martinet; 1874
  • 6 Suami H. Lymphosome concept: anatomical study of the lymphatic system. J Surg Oncol 2017; 115 (01) 13-17
  • 7 Suami H, Scaglioni MF. Anatomy of the lymphatic system and the lymphosome concept with reference to lymphedema. Semin Plast Surg 2018; 32 (01) 5-11
  • 8 Suami H, Taylor GI, O'Neill J, Pan WR. Refinements of the radiographic cadaver injection technique for investigating minute lymphatic vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 61-67
  • 9 Suami H, Taylor GI, Pan WR. The lymphatic territories of the upper limb: anatomical study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (06) 1813-1822
  • 10 Kubik S. The role of the lateral upper arm bundle and the lymphatic watersheds in the formation of collateral pathways in lymphedema. Acta Biol Acad Sci Hung 1980; 31 (1–3): 191-200
  • 11 Spiguel L, Shaw C, Katz A. , et al. Fluorescein Isothiocyanate: A Novel Application for Lymphatic Surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (6S, Suppl. 5): S296-S298
  • 12 Johnson AR, Singhal D. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118 (05) 750-757
  • 13 DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14 (06) 500-515
  • 14 Suami H, Koelmeyer L, Mackie H, Boyages J. Patterns of lymphatic drainage after axillary node dissection impact arm lymphoedema severity: a review of animal and clinical imaging studies. Surg Oncol 2018; 27 (04) 743-750