RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693465
Simulation in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship Programs
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ajp/202012/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0039-1693465_190131-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to investigate the use of simulation in neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship programs.
Study Design This was a cross-sectional survey of program directors (PDs) and simulation educators in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited NPM fellowship programs.
Results Responses were received from 59 PDs and 52 simulation educators, representing 60% of accredited programs. Of responding programs, 97% used simulation, which most commonly included neonatal resuscitation (94%) and procedural skills (94%) training. The time and scope of simulation use varied significantly. The majority of fellows (51%) received ≤20 hours of simulation during training. The majority of PDs (63%) wanted fellows to receive >20 hours of simulation. Barriers to simulation included lack of faculty time, experience, funding, and curriculum.
Conclusion While the majority of fellowship programs use simulation, the time and scope of fellow exposure to simulation experiences are limited. The creation of a standardized simulation curriculum may address identified barriers to simulation.
Keywords
simulation - neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship - neonatology - fellowship - medical educationPublikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 13. März 2019
Angenommen: 06. Juni 2019
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Juli 2019
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
-
References
- 1 Halamek LP. The simulated delivery-room environment as the future modality for acquiring and maintaining skills in fetal and neonatal resuscitation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 13 (06) 448-453
- 2 Hamstra S, Philibert I. Simulation in graduate medical education: understanding uses and maximizing benefits. J Grad Med Educ 2012; 4 (04) 539-540
- 3 McLaughlin SA, Bond W, Promes S, Spillane L. The status of human simulation training in emergency medicine residency programs. Simul Healthc 2006; 1 (Spec no): 18-21
- 4 Eppich WJ, Nypaver MM, Mahajan P. , et al. The role of high-fidelity simulation in training pediatric emergency medicine fellows in the United States and Canada. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013; 29 (01) 1-7
- 5 Doughty CB, Kessler DO, Zuckerbraun NS. , et al. Simulation in pediatric emergency medicine fellowships. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (01) e152-e158
- 6 Johnson L, Mu T, Sawyer T. Use of medical simulation in neonatal-perinatal fellowship training programs. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2012; 5 (04) 339-345
- 7 Irby DM, O'Sullivan PS. Developing and rewarding teachers as educators and scholars: remarkable progress and daunting challenges. Med Educ 2018; 52 (01) 58-67
- 8 Sawyer T, White M, Zaveri P. , et al. Learn, see, practice, prove, do, maintain: an evidence-based pedagogical framework for procedural skill training in medicine. Acad Med 2015; 90 (08) 1025-1033
- 9 Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27 (01) 10-28
- 10 French H, Gray M, Gillam-Krakauer M. , et al. Flipping the classroom: a national pilot curriculum for physiology in neonatal-perinatal medicine. J Perinatol 2018; 38 (10) 1420-1427