Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2019; 08(06): 446-451
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692470
Special Review: Scaphoid Fracture Patterns
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Scaphoid Fracture Patterns—Part Two: Reproducibility and Demographics of a Simplified Scaphoid Fracture Classification

Tessa Drijkoningen
1   Hand and Arm Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Amin Mohamadi
1   Hand and Arm Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Wouter F. van Leeuwen
1   Hand and Arm Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Yonatan Schwarcz
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
,
David Ring
3   Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
,
Geert A. Buijze
4   Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Unit, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

31 July 2018

03 May 2019

Publication Date:
12 July 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To analyze the reproducibility, reliability, and demographics of a simplified anatomical scaphoid fracture classification based on posteroanterior radiographs using a large database of scaphoid fractures.

Methods The study consisted of a retrospective review of electronic medical records of 871 consecutive patients. All patients presented between 2003 and 2014 at two centers. Patient- and surgeon-related factors were analyzed. Additionally, interobserver reliability of the Herbert and simplified scaphoid fracture classifications were tested.

Results Proximal pole fractures were defined as fractures in which the center of the fracture line was proximal to the distal scapholunate interval (n = 30), waist fractures (n = 802) were defined as fractures involving the scaphocapitate interval, and distal tubercle fractures (n = 39) were defined as fractures involving the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) interval. The interobserver reliability of the simplified classification was fair (κ = 0.37) as for the Herbert classification (κ = 0.31). The average doubt of the answers of the observers was 2.1 on a scale from 0 to 10 for the simplified classification and 3.6 for the Herbert classification (P < 0.05).

Conclusions All complete fractures across the entire scaphoid distal to the scapholunate articulation and proximal to the STT joint can be classified as waist fractures; nonwaist scaphoid fractures are uncommon (6%) and have somewhat different presentations compared to waist fractures. Simplifying the fracture classification slightly improves interobserver reliability, although remaining fair, and significantly reduces doubt.

Level of Evidence This is a Level III, prognostic study.

Keywords

scaphoid fracture - reproducibility - demographics - classification

Ethical Committee

Partners Healthcare, Boston, United States.


 

  • References

  • 1 Herbert TJ, Fisher WE. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66 (01) 114-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cooney WP, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; (149) 90-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ten Berg PW, Drijkoningen T, Strackee SD, Buijze GA. Classifications ofacute scaphoid fractures: a systematic literature review. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5 (02) 152-159 . Doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571280
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Buijze GA, Goslings JC, Rhemrev SJ. , et al; CAST Trial Collaboration. Cast immobilization with and without immobilization of the thumb for nondisplaced and minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (04) 621-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Siegel SCJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Compson JP. The anatomy of acute scaphoid fractures: a three-dimensional analysis of patterns. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (02) 218-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Grewal R, Suh N, Macdermid JC. Use of computed tomography to predict union and time to union in acute scaphoid fractures treated nonoperatively. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (05) 872-877
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Beks RB, Drijkoningen T, Claessen F, Guitton TG, Ring D. ; Science of Variation Group. Interobserver variability of the diagnosis of scaphoid proximal pole fractures. J Wrist Surg 2018; 7 (04) 350-354
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Slutsky DJ, Herzberg G, Shin AY. , et al. Coronal fractures of the scaphoid: a review. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5 (03) 194-201
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Oron A, Gupta A, Thirkannad S. Nonunion of the scaphoid distal pole. Hand Surg 2013; 18 (01) 35-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Compson JP, Waterman JK, Spencer JD. Dorsal avulsion fractures of the scaphoid: diagnostic implications and applied anatomy. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (01) 58-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Luria S, Schwarcz Y, Wollstein R, Emelife P, Zinger G, Peleg E. 3-dimensional analysis of scaphoid fracture angle morphology. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (03) 508-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mussbichler H. Injuries of the carpal scaphoid in children. Acta Radiol 1961; 56: 361-368
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schernberg F. [Classification of fractures of the carpal scaphoid. An anatomo-radiologic study of characteristics]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1988; 74 (08) 693-695
    PubMedGoogle Scholar