Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2020; 81(01): 001-009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691822
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Surgical Planning in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Karsten Schöller   *
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
,
Sebastian Siller    *
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Christian Brem
3   Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Jürgen Lutz
4   Institute of Neuroradiology, Ingolstadt Hospital, Ingolstadt, Germany
,
Stefan Zausinger
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 November 2018

04 March 2019

Publication Date:
10 June 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and Study Aims/Objective Despite its invasiveness, computed tomography myelography (CTM) is still considered an important supplement to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative evaluation of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). We analyzed if diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) could be a less invasive alternative for this purpose.

Material and Methods In 20 patients with CSM and an indication for decompression of at least one level, CTM was performed preoperatively to determine the extent of spinal canal/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space and cord compression (Naganawa score) for a decision on the number of levels to be decompressed. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were correlated with these parameters and with MRI-based increased signal intensity (ISI). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity to discriminate levels requiring decompression surgery. European Myelopathy Score (EMS) and neck/radicular visual analog scale (VAS-N/R) were used for clinical evaluation.

Results According to preoperative CTM, 20 levels of maximum and 16 levels of relevant additional stenosis were defined and decompressed. Preoperative FA and particularly ADC showed a significant correlation with the CTM Naganawa score but also with the ISI grade. Furthermore, both FA and ADC facilitated a good discrimination between stenotic and nonstenotic levels with cutoff values < 0.49 for FA and > 1.15 × 10−9 m2/s for ADC. FA and especially ADC revealed a considerably higher sensitivity (79% and 82%, respectively) in discriminating levels requiring decompression surgery compared with ISI (55%). EMS and VAS-N/R were significantly improved at 14 months compared with preoperative values.

Conclusion DTI parameters are highly sensitive at distinguishing surgical from nonsurgical levels in CSM patients and might therefore represent a less invasive alternative to CTM for surgical planning.

Keywords

cervical spondylotic myelopathy - diffusion tensor imaging - computed tomography myelography - magnetic resonance imaging

* These two authors contributed equally to the article and should be considered co-first authors.


 

  • References

  • 1 Vedantam A, Jonathan A, Rajshekhar V. Association of magnetic resonance imaging signal changes and outcome prediction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15 (06) 660-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Naganawa T, Miyamoto K, Ogura H, Suzuki N, Shimizu K. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomogram-myelography for evaluation of cross sections of cervical spinal morphology. Spine 2011; 36 (01) 50-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Stafira JS, Sonnad JR, Yuh WTC. , et al. Qualitative assessment of cervical spinal stenosis: observer variability on CT and MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24 (04) 766-769
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Reul J, Gievers B, Weis J, Thron A. Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography. Neuroradiology 1995; 37 (03) 187-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shafaie FF, Wippold II FJ, Gado M, Pilgram TK, Riew KD. Comparison of computed tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. Spine 1999; 24 (17) 1781-1785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Song K-J, Choi B-W, Kim G-H, Kim J-R. Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool?. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22 (05) 353-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C. , et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13 (04) 534-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Xiangshui M, Xiangjun C, Xiaoming Z. , et al. 3 T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical myelopathy. Clin Radiol 2010; 65 (06) 465-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rajasekaran S, Yerramshetty JS, Chittode VS, Kanna RM, Balamurali G, Shetty AP. The assessment of neuronal status in normal and cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor imaging. Spine 2014; 39 (15) 1183-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Facon D, Ozanne A, Fillard P, Lepeintre J-F, Tournoux-Facon C, Ducreux D. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26 (06) 1587-1594
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Herdmann J, Linzbach M, Krzan M, Dvorák J, Bock WJ. The European Myelopathy Score. In: Bauer BL, ed. Cerebellar Infarct, Midline Tumors, Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Neurosurgery (MIEN). Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1994: 266-268 . Advances in Neurosurgery; Vol 22
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K. MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine 2007; 32 (15) 1675-1678 ; discussion 1679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Samii M, Völkening D, Sepehrnia A, Penkert G, Baumann H. Surgical treatment of myeloradiculopathy in cervical spondylosis. A report on 438 operations. Neurosurg Rev 1989; 12 (04) 285-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Westermaier T, Doerr C, Stetter C. , et al. Influence of myelography and postmyelographic CT on therapeutic decisions in degenerative diseases of the cervical spine. Clin Spine Surg 2017; 30 (05) E656-E661
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Matsumoto T, Imagama S, Inoue H, Aoki T, Ishiguro N, Osawa Y. Outpatient myelography: a prospective trial comparing complications after myelography between outpatients and inpatients in Japan. Asian Spine J 2015; 9 (06) 928-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chitnis AS, Guh AY, Benowitz I. , et al. Outbreak of bacterial meningitis among patients undergoing myelography at an outpatient radiology clinic. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9 (03) 185-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Soliman HM, Arnold PM, Madarang EJ. Post-myelography paraplegia in a woman with thoracic stenosis. J Spinal Cord Med 2013; 36 (03) 247-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CTW. , et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology 2003; 229 (01) 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Toktas ZO, Tanrıkulu B, Koban O, Kilic T, Konya D. Diffusion tensor imaging of cervical spinal cord: A quantitative diagnostic tool in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2016; (01) 26-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jones JGA, Cen SY, Lebel RM, Hsieh PC, Law M. Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with the clinical assessment of disease severity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and predicts outcome following surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34 (02) 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schatlo B, Remonda L, Gruber P. , et al. Cervical spine prospective feasibility study: dynamic flexion-extension diffusion-tensor weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Neuroradiol 2018 ; April 18 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Li X, Cui J-L, Mak K-C, Luk KD-K, Hu Y. Potential use of diffusion tensor imaging in level diagnosis of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2014; 39 (10) E615-E622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wang KY, Idowu O, Thompson CB. , et al. Tract-specific diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy before and after decompressive spinal surgery: preliminary results. Clin Neuroradiol 2017; 27 (01) 61-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ohshio I, Hatayama A, Kaneda K, Takahara M, Nagashima K. Correlation between histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions. Spine 1993; 18 (09) 1140-1149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ito T, Oyanagi K, Takahashi H, Takahashi HE, Ikuta F. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine 1996; 21 (07) 827-833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Karadimas SK, Erwin WM, Ely CG, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG. Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2013; 38 (22) , Suppl (Suppl. 01) S21-S36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Faiss JH, Schroth G, Grodd W, Koenig E, Will B, Thron A. Central spinal cord lesions in stenosis of the cervical canal. Neuroradiology 1990; 32 (02) 117-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sliwa JA, Maclean IC. Ischemic myelopathy: a review of spinal vasculature and related clinical syndromes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73 (04) 365-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar