Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · VCOT Open 2019; 02(01): e73-e80
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691781
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Correction of Biapical Tibial Deformity by True Spherical Osteotomy, Modified Circular External Skeletal Fixation and Distraction Osteogenesis

Darby Walmsley
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Neurology, Fitzpatrick Referrals, Godalming, Surrey, United Kingdom
,
Noel Fitzpatrick
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Neurology, Fitzpatrick Referrals, Godalming, Surrey, United Kingdom
,
Cameron Black
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Neurology, Fitzpatrick Referrals, Godalming, Surrey, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

30 October 2018

10 April 2019

Publication Date:
14 June 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to describe a case of biapical tibial deformity as a result of premature distal physeal closure corrected by true spherical osteotomy, circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis.

Methods A 6-month-old male Labrador Retriever was presented for the evaluation and treatment of angular limb deformity of the left pelvic limb, with radiography and computed tomography revealing a multiplanar, biapical, compensatory tibial growth deformity, with marked distal tibial recurvatum and varus. A true spherical osteotomy was performed at the distal tibial centre of rotation of angulation (CORA), allowing for correction of the deformity in three planes, with a transverse osteotomy performed at the most proximal CORA. A circular external skeletal fixator was applied and distraction osteogenesis performed at the transverse osteotomy. Latency, distraction osteogenesis, and consolidation were performed over a 113-day period.

Results At frame removal, tibial length discrepancy improved from 16.8% to 0.6% and frontal plane varus angulation improvement from 20° to 5°, when compared with the contralateral limb. Long-term evaluation revealed a satisfactory clinical and cosmetic outcome, judged by the clinician and owners, with force plate analysed symmetry index of the pelvic limb within reported normal limits.

Clinical significance To our knowledge this is the first case report illustrating the value of true spherical osteotomy for the treatment of an angular limb deformity when performed in combination with distraction osteogenesis in a canine pelvic limb.

Keywords

angular limb deformity - true spherical osteotomy - distraction osteogenesis - external skeletal fixation

Author Contribution

All authors contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors also drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.


 

  • References

  • 1 Ramadan RO, Vaughan LC. Disturbance in the growth of the tibia and femur in dogs. Vet Rec 1979; 104 (19) 433-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Marretta SM, Schrader SC. Physeal injuries in the dog: a review of 135 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 182 (07) 708-710
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Vaughan LC. Growth plate defects in dogs. Vet Rec 1976; 98 (10) 185-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ramadan RO, Vaughan LC. Premature closure of the distal ulnar growth plate in dogs--a review of 58 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1978; 19 (11) 647-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Carrig C, Merkley B, Mostosky U. Asynchronous growth of the canine radius and ulna: effects of different amounts of ulnar growth retardation. J Am Vet Radiol Society 1978; 19: 16-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Marcellin-Little DJ, Ferretti A, Roe SC, DeYoung DJ. Hinged Ilizarov external fixation for correction of antebrachial deformities. Vet Surg 1998; 27 (03) 231-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Johnson SG, Hulse DA, Vangundy TE, Green RW. Corrective osteotomy for pes varus in the dachshund. Vet Surg 1989; 18 (05) 373-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fox D, Tomlinson J. Principles of angular limb deformity correction. In: Tobias K, Johnston S. , eds., Small Animal Veterinary Surgery. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2012: 657-668
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kettelkamp DB, Hillberry BM, Murrish DE, Heck DA. Degenerative arthritis of the knee secondary to fracture malunion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (234) 159-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Slocum B, Slocum T. Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy for cranial cruciate ligament rupture. In Bojrab MJ. , ed. Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1998: 1187-1193
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Morris E, Lipowitz AJ. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218 (03) 363-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Roush JK. Canine patellar luxation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23 (04) 855-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Petazzoni M, Nicetto T, Vezzoni A, Piras A, Palmer R. Treatment of pes varus using locking plate fixation in seven Dachshund dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25 (03) 231-238
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Radasch RM, Lewis DF, McDonald DE, Calfee EF, Barstad RD. Pes varus correction in Dachshunds using a hybrid external fixator. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (01) 71-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lewis D, Radasch R, Beale B. , et al. Initial clinical experience with the IMEX circular external skeletal fixation system. Part II: use in bone lengthening and correction of angular and rotational deformities. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 118-127
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kwan TW, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OL. Correction of biapical radial deformities by use of bi-level hinged circular external fixation and distraction osteogenesis in 13 dogs. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (03) 316-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fox DB, Tomlinson JL, Cook JL, Breshears LM. Principles of uniapical and biapical radial deformity correction using dome osteotomies and the center of rotation of angulation methodology in dogs. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (01) 67-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Paley D. Osteotomy concepts and frontal plane realignment. In: Paley D, Herzenberg JE. , eds. Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2003: 99-154
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook JL, Song KJ. Radiographic measurement of the proximal and distal mechanical joint angles in the canine tibia. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (07) 699-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook JL, Witsberger TH. Radiographic measurement of canine tibial angles in the sagittal plane. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (03) 300-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (239) 263-285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bockstahler B, Tichy A, Aigner P. Compensatory load redistribution in Labrador Retrievers when carrying different weights--a non-randomized prospective trial. BMC Vet Res 2016; 12: 92-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Reif U, Probst CW. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in normal and cranial cruciate deficient stifles of Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2003; 32 (04) 385-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sikes R, Olds R, Renegar W. , et al. Dome osteotomy for the correction of long bone malunions: case reports and discussion of surgical technique. J Am Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 221-226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hahn SB, Choi YR, Kang HJ. Corrective dome osteotomy for cubitus varus and valgus in adults. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18 (01) 38-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hu QS, Ul-Haq R, Park KS, Yoon TR, Lee KB. Dome osteotomy of the pelvis using a modified trochanteric osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (01) 9-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 MacDonald JM, Matthiesen D. Treatment of forelimb growth plate deformity in 11 dogs by radial dome osteotomy and external coaptation. Vet Surg 1991; 20 (06) 402-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fitzpatrick N, Nikolaou C, Ochoa J. , et al. True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel blade design in a dog with anebrachial growth deformity: Planning and execution of technique. In: Proceedings of Veterinary Orthopedic Society 38th Annual Conference; Snowmass, Colorado; February 20–27, 2011:22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jaeger GH, Marcellin-Little DJ, Ferretti A. Morphology and correction of distal tibial valgus deformities. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48 (12) 678-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Choate C, Lewis S, Kim E, Cerdea CW. Use of hinged circular fixator constructs for the correction of crural deformities in three dogs. Aus Vet J 2012; 90 (07) 256-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tuohy JL, Marcellin-Little DJ, Griffith EH. Durations of bone consolidation and external fixation after distraction osteogenesis in dogs. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (08) 903-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar