Synlett 2020; 31(09): 866-870
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691601
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Nucleophilic Addition to Nitrones Using a Flow Microreactor

Yukihiro Arakawa
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokushima University, Minamijosanjima, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan
,
Shun Ueta
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokushima University, Minamijosanjima, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan
,
Takuma Okamoto
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokushima University, Minamijosanjima, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan
,
Keiji Minagawa
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokushima University, Minamijosanjima, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan
b   Institute of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Tokushima University, Minamijosanjima, Tokushima 770-8502, Japan   Email: imada@tokushima-u.ac.jp
,
Yasushi Imada
a   Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokushima University, Minamijosanjima, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan
› Author Affiliations
This work was supported by the Research Clusters program of Tokushima University (no. 1802001).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 16 January 2020

Accepted after revision: 30 January 2020

Publication Date:
18 February 2020 (online)


Abstract

Nucleophilic addition reactions of soft carbon nucleophiles to nitrones in a flow microreactor are reported for the first time. Under microflow conditions at 30 to 0 °C, a range of nitrones can be efficiently transformed into the corresponding oxyiminium ions by reaction with either acyl halides or trialkylsilyl triflates. These can subsequently undergo the addition of nucleophiles including allyltributylstannane, ketene methyl tert-butyldimethylsilyl acetal, and N-silyl ketene imines to afford the corresponding adducts in high yields; such reactions at a similar temperature under batch conditions resulted in lower yields because of undesired side reactions.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Murahashi S.-I, Imada Y. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 4684
  • 2 Lombardo M, Trombini C. Synthesis 2000; 759
  • 3 Merino P, Tejero T. Synlett 2011; 1965
  • 4 Kawakami T, Ohtake H, Arakawa H, Okachi T, Imada Y, Murahashi S.-I. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2000; 73: 2423

    • For selected papers on the nitrone-to-amide rearrangement, see:
    • 5a Hamer J, Macaluso A. Chem. Rev. 1964; 64: 473
    • 5b Barton DH. R, Day MJ, Hesse RH, Pechet MM. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971; 945
    • 5c Zeng Y, Smith BT, Hershberger J, Aubé J. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 8065
    • 5d Zhang Y, Blackman ML, Leduc AB, Jamison TF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 4251
  • 6 Yoshimura F, Abe T, Tanino K. Synlett 2014; 25: 1863
    • 7a Yoshida J. Flash Chemistry. Fast Organic Synthesis in Microsystems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Chichester: 2008
    • 7b Yoshida J, Takahashi Y, Nagaki A. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 9896
    • 7c Yoshida J, Saito K, Nokami T, Nagaki A. Synlett 2011; 1189
  • 8 (2bA) A dichloromethane solution of 1b (1.00 M) and that of benzoyl chloride (1.05 M) were fed to the first micromixer (YMC, Deneb, SUS316) by syringe pumps (YMC, YSP-101) equipped with a gastight syringe through polytetrafluoroethylene microtubes (50 cm length, inside diameter Ø = 500 μm) at a flow rate of 0.063 mL min–1 at 20 °C. The resulting mixture was delivered to the second micromixer through a microtube (200 cm length, Ø = 500 μm), while a dichloromethane solution of A (0.60 M) was equally fed to the same mixer at a flow rate of 0.126 mL min–1. The finally resulting mixture was further run through the microtube (1000 cm length, Ø  = 500 μm) at 30 °C before coming out from an outlet. After a steady state was reached, the outflow was collected for 1159 s onto water and diluted with EtOAc (5 mL) and hexane (2 mL). The mixture was washed successively with a sat. NaHCO3 aq solution (2 mL × 3) and brine (2 mL × 3), dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude product was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (hexane/EtOAc 95:5) to afford 2bA as a brown oil. Yield: 0.319 g (89%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.71 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.05 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.51 (dt, J = 12.5, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (dt, J = 12.5, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.00–5.07 (m, 1 H), 5.05–5.11 (m, 1 H), 6.01 (ddt, J = 17.1, 10.2, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.11–7.23 (m, 4 H), 7.35–7.44 (m, 2 H), 7.50–7.57 (m, 1 H), 7.88–7.97 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 25.5, 39.2, 49.7, 65.0, 117.0, 126.2, 126.6, 127.0, 128.5, 129.4, 129.5, 133.1, 133.4, 135.2, 135.7, 164.9. Anal. Calcd for C19H19NO2: C, 77.79; H, 6.53; N, 4.77. Found: C, 77.68; H, 6.61; N, 4.87.
  • 9 Ohtake H, Imada Y, Murahashi S.-I. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1999; 72: 2737
  • 10 Denmark SE, Wilson TW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 9980