Synlett 2019; 30(10): 1199-1203
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1689934
cluster
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Three-Component Chlorophosphinoylation of Alkenes via Anodically Coupled Electrolysis

,
Niankai Fu
,
Song Lin  *
Financial support for this work was provided by Cornell University (Division of Chemistry) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) (CHE-1751839). This study made use of the NMR facility supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-1531632).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 22 April 2019

Accepted after revision: 20 May 2019

Publication Date:
23 May 2019 (online)


Published as part of the Cluster Electrochemical Synthesis and Catalysis

Abstract

We report the development of an electrocatalytic protocol for the chlorophosphinoylation of simple alkenes. Driven by electricity and mediated by a Mn catalyst, the heterodifunctionalization reaction takes place with high efficiency and regioselectivity. Cyclic voltammetry data are consistent with a mechanistic scenario based on anodically coupled electrolysis in which the generation of two distinct radical intermediates occur simultaneously on the anode and are both mediated by the Mn catalyst.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes


    • For representative reviews, see:
    • 1a Jutand A. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 2300
    • 1b Francke R, Little RD. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 2492
    • 1c Meyer TH, Finger LH, Gandeepan P, Ackermann L. Trends Chem. 2019; 1: 63

      For representative reviews, see:
    • 2a Sauer GS, Lin S. ACS Catal. 2018; 8: 5175
    • 2b Martins GM, Shirinfar B, Hardwick T, Ahmed N. ChemElectroChem 2019; 6: 1300
    • 2c Mei H, Yin Z, Liu J, Sun H, Han J. Chin. J. Chem. 2019; 37: 292

      For examples, see:
    • 3a Belleau B, Au-Young YK. Can. J. Chem. 1969; 47: 2117
    • 3b Kojima M, Sakuragi H, Tokumaru K. Chem. Lett. 1981; 10: 1707
    • 3c Ashikari Y, Shimizu A, Nokami T, Yoshida J.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 16070
    • 3d Feng R, Smith JA, Moeller KD. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017; 50: 2346
    • 3e Xiong P, Long H, Song J, Wang Y, Li J.-F, Xu H.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 16387
    • 3f Wu J, Dou Y, Guillot R, Kouklovsky C, Vincent G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 2832

      For examples, see:
    • 4a Schafer H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1970; 9: 158
    • 4b Yuan Y, Chen Y, Tang S, Huang Z, Lei A. Sci. Adv. 2018; 4: eaat531
    • 4c Zhang L, Zhang G, Wang P, Li Y, Lei A. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 7396
    • 4d Xu F, Zhu L, Zhu S, Yan X, Xu H.-C. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 12740
    • 4e Chen J, Yan WQ, Lam CM, Zeng CC, Hu LM, Little RD. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 986
    • 5a Fu N, Sauer GS, Lin S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 15548
    • 5b Fu N, Sauer GS, Saha A, Loo A, Lin S. Science 2017; 357: 575
    • 5c Ye K, Pombar G, Fu N, Sauer GS, Keresztes I, Lin S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 2438
    • 5d Fu N, Shen Y, Allen AR, Song L, Ozaki A, Lin S. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 746
    • 5e Siu JC, Parry JB, Lin S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 2825
  • 7 For an example of chemical chlorophosphinoylation using MnO2 as the terminal oxidant, see: Richard V, Fisher HC, Montchamp JL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56: 3197

    • For representative reviews on phosphine/phosphine oxide catalysis, see:
    • 8a Grushin VV. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 1629
    • 8b Xie JH, Zhou QL. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008; 41: 581
    • 8c Hayashi T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000; 33: 354
    • 9a Yan M, Kawamata Y, Baran PS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 57: 4149
    • 9b Fu N, Sauer GS, Lin S. Nat. Protoc. 2018; 13: 1725
  • 10 Chlorophosphinoylation; General ProcedureAn oven-dried, 10 mL two-neck glass tube was equipped with a magnetic stir bar, a rubber septum, a Teflon cap fitted with electrical feedthroughs, a carbon felt anode (1.0 × 0.5 cm2) (connected to the electrical feedthrough via a 9 cm in length, 2 mm in diameter graphite rod), and a platinum foil cathode (0.5 × 1.0 cm2). To this reaction vessel, bipy (1.9 mg, 0.012 mmol, 6 mol%), Mn(OTf)2 (3.6 mg, 0.01 mmol, 5 mol%), phosphorous source (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and lithium chloride (17.0 mg, 0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were added. The cell was sealed, 3 mL of electrolyte solution (0.10 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile) was added, and the mixture was flushed with nitrogen gas for 5 min, followed by the addition, via syringe, of a mixture of olefin substrate (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 0.5 mL of electrolyte solution, and acetic acid (0.40 mL). A nitrogen-filled balloon was connected through the septum to sustain a nitrogen atmosphere. Electrolysis was initiated at a constant cell voltage of 2.3 V at 22 °C. The reaction was stopped after 3.0 F charge was passed. The entire reaction mixture was then transferred to a short silica gel column (7–10 cm in length, ca. 10 g) and flushed through with 100 mL of a 1:1 mixture of hexanes and acetone to eliminate the inorganic salts, and the product solution was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was subjected to flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluted with hexanes/ethyl acetate) to yield the pure product. See the Supporting Information for full details and graphical guide.Representative Product Characterization; 3-Chloro-2-(diphenylphosphoryl)-3-methylbutyl Benzoate (16)Yield: 54.9 mg (65%); white solid; IR (film): 2982, 1972, 1719, 1438, 1273, 1182, 1114, 1100, 1072, 1026, 704, 524 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.00 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.4 Hz, 4 H), 7.80–7.70 (m, 2 H), 7.63–7.51 (m, 4 H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (td, J = 7.3, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.25–7.19 (m, 2 H), 4.90 (ddd, J = 21.8, 12.2, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.64–4.35 (m, 1 H), 3.35 (dt, J = 10.3, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.02 (s, 3 H), 1.68 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 165.69, 134.79 (d, J = 97 Hz), 133.24, 132.42 (d, J = 98 Hz), 132.00 (d, J = 2.8 Hz), 131.79 (d, J = 2.8 Hz), 130.87 (d, J = 8.9 Hz), 130.69 (d, J = 8.7 Hz), 129.99, 129.55, 129.08 (d, J = 10 Hz), 128.59 (d, J = 11 Hz), 128.51, 74.30, 74.27, 62.79, 62.77, 50.50 (d, J = 62 Hz), 35.20, 31.12; 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 27.38; HRMS (DART): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C24H25ClO3P+: 427.1224; found: 427.1222 .
  • 11 For a chemical method for the azidophosphinoylation reaction using stoichiometric Mn(OAc)3, see: Xu J, Li X, Gao Y, Zhang L, Chen W, Fang H, Tang G, Zhao Y. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 11240
  • 12 In this manuscript, [MnIII] denotes a MnIII species with a bipy ligand, the structure of which has not been definitively elucidated at this stage.

    • For examples of phosphinoyl radical addition to alkenes in synthetic contexts, see:
    • 13a Zhang C, Li Z, Zhu L, Wang Z, Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 14082
    • 13b Taniguchi T, Idota A, Yokoyama S, Ishibashi H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 4768
    • 13c Zhou S, Li D, Liu K, Zou J, Asekun O. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 80: 1214
    • 13d Zhang P, Zhang L, Li J, Shoberu A, Zou J, Zhang W. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 5537
    • 13e Zhang H.-Y, Mao L.-L, Yang B, Yang S.-D. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 4101
    • 13f Chen D, Wu Z, Yao Y, Zhu C. Org. Chem. Front. 2018; 5: 2370
    • 13g Electrochemical generation of P-centered radicals: Li Q.-Y, Swaroop TR, Hou C, Wang Z.-Q, Pan Y.-M, Tang H.-T. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019; 361: 1761

      For examples of MnIII-mediated chlorination of alkenes by means of [MnIII]–Cl intermediates, see:
    • 14a Donnelly KD, Fristad WE, Gellerman BJ, Peterson JR, Selle BJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984; 25: 607
    • 14b Snider BB, Patricia JJ, Kates SA. J. Org. Chem. 1988; 53: 2137

      For examples of MnII/III electrochemical reactions, see:
    • 15a Snider BB, McCarthy BA. Mn(III)-Mediated Electrochemical Oxidative Free-Radical Cyclizations . In Benign by Design . Anastas PT, Farris CA. ACS Symposium Series 577; American Chemical Society; Washington DC: 1994. Chap. 10 84-97
    • 15b Merchant RR, Oberg KM, Lin Y, Novak AJ. E, Felding J, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 7462
    • 15c Shundo R, Nishiguchi I, Matsubara Y, Hirashima T. Chem. Lett. 1991; 235
    • 15d Shundo R, Nishiguchi I, Matsubara Y, Hirashima T. Tetrahedron 1991; 47: 831; also see refs 5a-d

      For representative recent reviews on the use of electrochemistry for organic reaction discovery, see:
    • 16a Yan M, Kawamata Y, Baran PS. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 13230
    • 16b Möhle S, Zirbes M, Rodrigo E, Gieshoff T, Wiebe A, Waldvogel SR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 6018
    • 16c Kärkäs MD. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018; 47: 5786
    • 16d Moeller KD. Chem. Rev. 2018; 118: 4817