Jnl Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688946
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Splinting after Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Postoperative Plaster Splint versus Soft Dressing

1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Christopher Jones
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Mark Wang
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1  Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

25 January 2019

09 April 2019

Publication Date:
27 May 2019 (eFirst)

Abstract

Background The effect of postoperative dressing and splinting after distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is not well understood. A prospective cohort analysis was performed to assess differences in functional and radiographic outcomes with the use of plaster splinting or soft dressing following DRF ORIF.

Methods All patients undergoing DRF ORIF with locking volar plates were consecutively enrolled. Preoperative demographic and postoperative radiographic and functional outcome data were collected at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Functional data included range of motion (ROM), pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Radiographic data included loss of fracture reduction.

Results A total of 139 patients were enrolled (79 plaster splinting, 60 soft dressing). By the first postoperative visit (POV), there was one case of loss of reduction with plaster splinting and one case with soft dressing with no hardware failure or revision surgery in either group, and no difference in DASH, PRWE, or VAS pain scores. By the final POV, the soft dressing group showed greater ROM in extension by 9.6, flexion by 10.9, and supination by 4.8 degrees over plaster splinting. Additionally, the soft dressing group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PRWE and DASH scores, as well as VAS pain scores as compared with plaster splinting.

Conclusions Applying only soft dressing following DRF ORIF demonstrated improvements in ROM, VAS, and functional outcomes by final follow-up, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes. No benefit of applying a plaster splint was identified.

Note

This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.