CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2019; 13(01): 114-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688741
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Ultraviolet A and Ultraviolet C Light-Induced Reduction of Surface Hydrocarbons on Titanium Implants

Zaheer Naauman
1   School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
2   Department of Oral Biology, Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
3   National University of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Zainul Ahmad Bin Rajion
4   Department of Oral Maxillofacial Imaging, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
,
Shahbaz Maliha
5   Department of Oral Biology, Rashid Latif Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Pauzi Hariy
6   Universiti Sains Malaysia's Science Officer Society, Science and Engineering Research Centre, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
,
Q. Saeed Muhammad
2   Department of Oral Biology, Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
3   National University of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
,
H. A. Razak Noor
7   Department in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 June 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective The carbon, titanium, and oxygen levels on titanium implant surfaces with or without ultraviolet (UV) pretreatment were evaluated at different wavelengths through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

Materials and Methods This interventional experimental study was conducted on nine Dio UFII implants with hybrid sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface treatments, divided equally into three groups. Control group A samples were not given UV irradiation, while groups B and C samples were given UVA (382 nm, 25 mWcm2) and UVC (260 nm, 15 mWcm2) irradiation, respectively. The atomic ratio of carbon, titanium, and oxygen was compared through XPS.

Results Mean carbon-to-titanium ratio and C1 peaks considerably increased in Group A compared to those in experimental Groups B and C. The intensity of Ti2p and O1s peaks was more pronounced for group C compared to that for groups A and B.

Conclusions Although the decrease in surface hydrocarbons was the same in both UV-treated groups, the peak intensity of oxygen increased in the UVC-treated group. Thus, it can be concluded that compared with UVA irradiation, UVC irradiation has the potential to induce more hydrophilicity on SLA-coated implants.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kamo M, Kyomoto M, Miyaji F. Time course of surface characteristics of alkali- and heat-treated titanium dental implants during vacuum storage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2017; 105 (06) 1453-1460
  • 2 Morra M, Cassinelli C, Bruzzone G. et al. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18 (01) 40-45
  • 3 Yoshihara C, Ueno T, Chen P, Tsutsumi Y, Hanawa T, Wakabayashi N. Inverse response of osteoblasts and fibroblasts to growth on carbon-deposited titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2018; 106 (05) 1869-1877
  • 4 Hayashi R, Ueno T, Migita S. et al. Hydrocarbon deposition attenuates osteoblast activity on titanium. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (07) 698-703
  • 5 Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Scheideler L, Hüttig F. Surface characteristics of dental implants: a review. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (01) 40-57
  • 6 Henningsen A, Smeets R, Heuberger R. et al. Changes in surface characteristics of titanium and zirconia after surface treatment with ultraviolet light or non-thermal plasma. Eur J Oral Sci 2018; 126 (02) 126-134
  • 7 Att W, Ogawa T. Biological aging of implant surfaces and their restoration with ultraviolet light treatment: a novel understanding of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27 (04) 753-761
  • 8 Li S, Ni J, Liu X. et al. Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface modified by ultraviolet irradiation: an in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012; 100 (06) 1587-1598
  • 9 Sackey SS, Vowotor MK, Owusu A. et al. Spectroscopic study of UV transparency of some materials. Environ Pollut 2015; 4 (04) 1
  • 10 Uchiyama H, Yamada M, Ishizaki K, Sakurai K. Specific ultraviolet-C irradiation energy for functionalization of titanium surface to increase osteoblastic cellular attachment. J Biomater Appl 2014; 28 (09) 1419-1429
  • 11 Aita H, Hori N, Takeuchi M. et al. The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone. Biomaterials 2009; 30 (06) 1015-1025
  • 12 Yamazaki M, Yamada M, Ishizaki K, Sakurai K. Ultraviolet-C irradiation to titanium implants increases peri-implant bone formation without impeding mineralization in a rabbit femur model. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73 (04) 302-311
  • 13 Gao Y, Liu Y, Zhou L. et al. The effects of different wavelength UV photofunctionalization on micro-arc oxidized titanium. PLoS One 2013; 8 (07) e68086
  • 14 Aita H, Att W, Ueno T. et al. Ultraviolet light-mediated photofunctionalization of titanium to promote human mesenchymal stem cell migration, attachment, proliferation and differentiation. Acta Biomater 2009; 5 (08) 3247-3257
  • 15 Miyauchi T, Yamada M, Yamamoto A. et al. The enhanced characteristics of osteoblast adhesion to photofunctionalized nanoscale TiO2 layers on biomaterials surfaces. Biomaterials 2010; 31 (14) 3827-3839
  • 16 Son HS, Ko G, Zoh KD. Kinetics and mechanism of photolysis and TiO2 photocatalysis of triclosan. J Hazard Mater 2009; 166 (02) (03) 954-960