Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2019; 13(01): 005-010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688739
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Aged Translucent Aesthetic Zirconia: Bond Strength Analysis

Bernardo Luiz Gallina
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Western State University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil
,
Mauro Carlos Agner Busato
2   Department of Orthodontics, Western State University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil
,
Eliseu Augusto Sicoli
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Western State University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil
,
Veridiana Camilotti
3   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Western State University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil
,
Marcio Jose Mendonca
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Western State University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 June 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study evaluates the bond strength of two compositions of aesthetic translucent zirconia (TZ).

Materials and Methods For this evaluation, test specimens were prepared from ICE Zirkon TZ and Prettau Anterior zirconia (PAZ) that were stored in distilled water at 37°C for two time periods: T1 (24 h) and T2 (90 days) to simulate aging. Two factors were evaluated for the samples—ceramic and aging time. The samples were subjected to tests of microshear strength and fracture type and were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy.

Results The results were analyzed using the D'Agostino test, analysis of variance, and Tukey's test (p < 0.01). Statistically significant differences were observed for ceramic type and aging time.

Conclusion The results showed that PAZ provides significantly superior performance to TZ at the two aging times evaluated.

Keywords

bond strength - microshear - zirconia
 

  • References

  • 1 Bavbek NC, Roulet JF, Ozcan M. Evaluation of microshear bond strength of orthodontic resin cement to monolithic zirconium oxide as a function of surface conditioning method. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16 (05) 473-480
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Schmutz F, Trottmann A, Roos M, Hämmerle CH. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71 (01) 102-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Park JH, Park S, Lee K, Yun KD, Lim HP. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111 (01) 20-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE. et al. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater 2015; 31 (10) 1180-1187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Vallittu PK, Närhi TO, Lassila LV. The effect of staining and vacuum sintering on optical and mechanical properties of partially and fully stabilized monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater J 2015; 34 (05) 605-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Harada K, Raigrodski AJ, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Dogan S, Mancl LA. A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116 (02) 257-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (10) 1195-1203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Aboushelib MN, Matinlinna JP, Salameh Z, Ounsi H. Innovations in bonding to zirconia-based materials: part I. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (09) 1268-1272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoğlu E, Arun T. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31 (04) 402-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bielen V, Inokoshi M, Munck JD. et al. Bonding effectiveness to differently sandblasted dental zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17 (03) 235-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gomes AL, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Lynch CD, Montero J, Albaladejo A. Influence of sandblasting granulometry and resin cement composition on microtensile bond strength to zirconia ceramic for dental prosthetic frameworks. J Dent 2013; 41 (01) 31-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elsaka SE. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of resin cements to monolithic zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18 (05) 387-395
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Foxton RM, Cavalcanti AN, Nakajima M. et al. Durability of resin cement bond to aluminium oxide and zirconia ceramics after air abrasion and laser treatment. J Prosthodont 2011; 20 (02) 84-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tanış MÇ, Akçaboy C. Effects of different surface treatment methods and MDP monomer on resin cementation of zirconia ceramics an in vitro study. J Lasers Med Sci 2015; 6 (04) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wandscher VF, Fraga S, Pozzobon JL. et al. Tribochemical glass ceramic coating as a new approach for resin adhesion to zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18 (05) 435-440
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gomes AL, Ramos JC, Santos-del Riego S, Montero J, Albaladejo A. Thermocycling effect on microshear bond strength to zirconia ceramic using Er:YAG and tribochemical silica coating as surface conditioning. Lasers Med Sci 2015; 30 (02) 787-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Paranhos MP, Burnett Jr LH, Magne P. Effect Of Nd:YAG laser and CO2 laser treatment on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. Quintessence Int 2011; 42 (01) 79-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gorler O, Ozdemir AK. Bonding strength of ceromer with direct laser sintered, Ni-Cr-based, and ZrO2 metal infrastructures after Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Ho:YAG laser surface treatments—a comparative in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 2016; 34 (08) 355-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Borba M, Miranda Jr WG, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, Bona AD. Evaluation of the adaptation of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures using micro-CT technology. Braz Oral Res 2013; 27 (05) 396-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Attia A. Bond strength of three luting agents to zirconia ceramic—influence of surface treatment and thermocycling. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19 (04) 388-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Siqueira F, Cardenas AM, Gutierrez MF. et al. Laboratory performance of universal adhesive systems for luting CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18 (04) 331-340
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2013; 28 (05) 1233-1239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hirai K, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K. et al. Influence of photoirradiation conditions on dentin bond durability and interfacial characteristics of universal adhesives. Dent Mater J 2017; 36 (06) 747-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE. et al. Degree of conversion of dual-polymerizing cements light polymerized through monolithic zirconia of different thicknesses and types. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114 (01) 103-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Souza-Junior EJ, Borges BC, Montes MA, Alonso RC, Ambrosano GM, Sinhoreti MA. Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants. Braz Dent J 2012; 23 (05) 477-483
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Lopes MB, Sinhoreti MA, Correr Sobrinho L, Consani S. Comparative study of the dental substrate used in shear bond strength tests. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2003; 17 (02) 171-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Inokoshi M, Zhang F, Vanmeensel K. et al. Residual compressive surface stress increases the bending strength of dental zirconia. Dent Mater 2017; 33 (04) e147-e154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (04) 329-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A. et al. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2012; 91 (04) 351-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Otani A, Amaral M, May LG, Cesar PF, Valandro LF. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP. Dent Mater 2015; 31 (06) 648-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Martins AR, Gotti VB, Shimano MM, Borges GA, Gonçalves LdeS. Improving adhesion between luting cement and zirconia-based ceramic with an alternative surface treatment. Braz Oral Res 2015; 29: 54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Noda Y, Nakajima M, Takahashi M. et al. The effect of five kinds of surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycle aging. Dent Mater J 2017; 36 (06) 755-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar