J reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688711
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Head and Neck Reconstruction: Does Surgical Specialty Affect Complication Rates?

James J. Drinane
1  Division Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, United States
,
John Drinane
2  Drinane Analytics, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States
,
Lakshmi Nair
1  Division Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, United States
,
Ashit Patel
1  Division Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

26 November 2018

04 March 2019

Publication Date:
08 May 2019 (eFirst)

Abstract

Background Reconstruction of head and neck defects resulting from resection of head and neck masses is performed by both plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database allows one to directly compare the outcomes for a given procedure based upon specialty. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes and resource utilization of microvascular head and neck reconstruction between plastic surgery and otolaryngology.

Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and NSQIP was queried from 2005 to 2015 with inclusion of Current Procedural Terminology codes for free tissue transfer performed for head and neck reconstruction. Outcomes were compared between cases having otolaryngology and plastic surgery as performing the free flap reconstruction.

Results During 2005 to 2015, a total of 2,322 flaps were performed, 893 by plastic surgery and 1,429 by otolaryngology. Average length of stay (LOS) was 13.7 and 11.4 days for plastic surgery and otolaryngology, respectively. It was found that plastic surgery performed more osteocutaneous flaps than otolaryngology. Higher rates of superficial surgical site infection, deep surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, myocardial infarction, bleeding complications, sepsis, unplanned return to the operating room, and unplanned readmission were observed for patients treated by otolaryngology (p < 0.05).

Conclusion This study shows plastic surgery patients have superior outcomes with regards to free tissue transfers of the head and neck when compared with otolaryngology patients. Although plastic surgery patients experienced a longer LOS, the significantly lower complication rate supports an overall more optimal resource utilization. Future studies may elucidate potential cost savings in patients treated by plastic surgery.

Note

This study was presented at the Plastic Surgery Meeting (ASPS) 2017 in Orlando, FL.


Supplementary Material