Do Individual Differences in Physical Therapists' Skills Affect Postoperative Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Abstract

We investigated variations in postoperative outcomes of total knee arthroplasty which were dependent on the physical therapist (PT) who performed rehabilitation while keeping other parameters as uniform as possible. Seventy-nine among 690 knees were selected based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to five PTs, who had from 2 to 21 years of experience. Range of motion (ROM) on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, and 14 and at postoperative months 3, 6, and 12, results of timed up and go (TUG) test on POD 14, time to walking with a single cane, and time to climbing stairs, were evaluated. There were significant differences until POD 3, and no significant differences afterward in flexion. There was a significant difference on POD 1 only in extension. The TUG test showed no significant difference, but there were significant differences at the time of walking with a single cane and climbing stairs. The time taken to achieve rehabilitation, which was determined subjectively by each PT, differed among therapists, but differences in ROM were present in early period. Therefore, ROM after surgery is not affected by differences between PTs.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - rehabilitation - range of motion - physical therapist

• References

• 1 Yoshida K, Sekiguchi M, Otani K. , et al. A validation study of the Brief Scale for Psychiatric problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) for patients with chronic low back pain (verification of reliability, validity, and reproducibility). J Orthop Sci 2011; 16 (01) 7-13
• 2 Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 9-12
• 3 Brosseau L, Balmer S, Tousignant M. , et al. Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82 (03) 396-402
• 4 Remigio W, Tsai N, Layos L, Chavez M. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the fluid goniometer for measuring active knee flexion in painful knees; correlations do not mean agreement. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29 (06) 984-988
• 5 White Jr RE, Allman JK, Trauger JA, Dales BH. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367) 117-122
• 6 Karpman RR, Smith HL. Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (05) 681-688
• 7 Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, Ulrich SD, Stroh DA, Seyler TM, Mont MA. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (03) 575-582
• 8 Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (10) 1911-1920
• 9 Hamilton WG, Sritulanondha S, Engh Jr CA. Prospective randomized comparison of high-flex and standard rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (6, Suppl): 28-34
• 10 Lin SY, Chen CH, Fu YC. , et al. Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of three minimally invasive techniques for total knee replacement at two years. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B [phone]
• 11 Tanikawa H, Sato T, Nagafuchi M, Takeda K, Oshida J, Okuma K. Comparison of local infiltration of analgesia and sciatic nerve block in addition to femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (12) 2462-2467
• 12 Yan CH, Chiu KY, Ng FY, Chan PK, Fang CX. Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (12) 3637-3645
• 13 Scott DF, Smith RR. A prospective, randomized comparison of posterior stabilized versus cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary report with minimum 2-year results. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (9, Suppl): 179-181
• 14 Zhang Z, Zhu W, Zhang W. High-flexion posterior-substituting versus cruciate-retaining prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome, range of motion and complication comparison. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135 (01) 119-124
• 15 Kramer JF, Speechley M, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Vaz M. Comparison of clinic- and home-based rehabilitation programs after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (410) 225-234
• 16 Kumar PJ, McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Wan Z, Baldwin K. Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2 rehabilitation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (331) 93-101
• 17 Büker N, Akkaya S, Akkaya N. , et al. Comparison of effects of supervised physiotherapy and a standardized home program on functional status in patients with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Phys Ther Sci 2014; 26 (10) 1531-1536
• 18 Herbold JA, Bonistall K, Walsh MB. Rehabilitation following total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and hip fracture: a case-controlled comparison. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2011; 34 (04) 155-160