CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2020; 07(02): 070-076
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1687918
Review Article

Prone Positioning of Patients with Cervical Spine Pathology

Sarah L. Boyle
1   Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Zoe Unger
1   Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Vinay Kulkarni
2   Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Eric M. Massicotte
2   Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Lashmi Venkatraghavan
1   Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Patients with cervical trauma or degenerative disease often require surgical decompression and stabilization in the prone position and are at the risk of secondary neurological injury during this transfer. This review aims to explore the current literature on different methods of positioning patients prone and to identify the safest technique to achieve prone positioning in patients with an unstable cervical spine undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery. We searched the Embase, Medline, and Medline-in Process databases for literature in English related to prone positioning patients with cervical spine pathology undergoing spine surgery. Seventy-three citations were identified as relevant and reviewed in detail with 20 articles being identified as answering the clinical questions posed. Our literature review identified three methods of prone positioning patients with cervical pathology: logroll with manual in-line stabilization (MILS), rotating the patient on a specialized spinal table using a “sandwich and flip” technique, and awake prone positioning. Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. When comparing the degree of neck movement between positioning techniques, “sandwich and flip” rotation was associated with over 50% reduction in both flexion–extension and axial–lateral rotation as compared to logroll with MILS. Awake self-positioning of a patient is another alternative that allows for rapid neurological assessment after repositioning. A “sandwich and flip” is the safest way to turn a patient with cervical pathology into a prone position for surgery. For cooperative patients, who are physically capable, awake self-positioning is a good alternative.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 May 2019

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Nguyen HV, Ludwig S, Gelb D. Osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures with neurologic compromise. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16 (01) 10-19
  • 2 Colterjohn NR, Bednar DA. Identifiable risk factors for secondary neurologic deterioration in the cervical spine-injured patient. Spine 1995; 20 (21) 2293-2297
  • 3 Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Vaccaro AR, Przybylski GJ. The cause of neurologic deterioration after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 2001; 26 (04) 340-346
  • 4 Yablon IG, Ordia J, Mortara R, Reed J, Spatz E. Acute ascending myelopathy of the spine. Spine 1989; 14 (10) 1084-1089
  • 5 Farmer J, Vaccaro A, Albert TJ, Malone S, Balderston RA, Cotler JM. Neurologic deterioration after cervical spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11 (03) 192-196
  • 6 Kutteruf R, Wells D, Stephens L, Posner KL, Lee LA, Domino KB. Injury and liability associated with spine surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2018; 30 (02) 156-162
  • 7 Crosby ET. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology 2006; 104 (06) 1293-1318
  • 8 Crosby ET, Lui A. The adult cervical spine: implications for airway management. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37 (01) 77-93
  • 9 Diedrich DA, Rose PS, Brown DR. Airway management in cervical spine injury. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2013; 3 (03) 197-204
  • 10 Brimacombe J, Keller C, Künzel KH, Gaber O, Boehler M, Pühringer F. Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers. Anesth Analg 2000; 91 (05) 1274-1278
  • 11 Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2007; 62 (10) 1050-1055
  • 12 Conrad BP, Rossi GD, Horodyski MB, Prasarn ML, Alemi Y, Rechtine GR. Eliminating log rolling as a spine trauma order. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3 (Suppl. 03) S188-S197
  • 13 Vanderhave KL, Chiravuri S, Caird MS. et al. Cervical spine trauma in children and adults: perioperative considerations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (06) 319-327
  • 14 Asiedu GB, Lowndes BR, Huddleston PM, Hallbeck S. “The Jackson Table Is a Pain in the…”: A Qualitative Study of Providers’ Perception Toward a Spinal Surgery Table. J Patient Saf. 2016; 14 (01) 21-26
  • 15 DiPaola MJ, DiPaola CP, Conrad BP. et al. Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21 (04) 273-280
  • 16 Malcharek MJ, Rogos B, Watzlawek S. et al. Awake fiberoptic intubation and self-positioning in patients at risk of secondary cervical injury: a pilot study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2012; 24 (03) 217-221
  • 17 Avitsian R, Lin J, Lotto M, Ebrahim Z. Dexmedetomidine and awake fiberoptic intubation for possible cervical spine myelopathy: a clinical series. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2005; 17 (02) 97-99
  • 18 Douglass J, Fraser J, Andrzejowski J. Awake intubation and awake prone positioning of a morbidly obese patient for lumbar spine surgery. Anaesthesia 2014; 69 (02) 166-169
  • 19 Olsen KS, Petersen JT, Pedersen NA, Rovsing L. Self-positioning followed by induction of anaesthesia and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation and subsequent positioning for spinal surgery in the prone position: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31 (05) 259-265
  • 20 Sriganesh K, Ramesh VJ, Veena S, Chandramouli BA. Dexmedetomidine for awake fibreoptic intubation and awake self-positioning in a patient with a critically located cervical lesion for surgical removal of infra-tentorial tumour. Anaesthesia 2010; 65 (09) 949-951
  • 21 Song J, Shin YS, Shim YH. The effect site concentration of remifentanil for suppressing severe cough and defensive movement during awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery: 9AP1-3. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 128
  • 22 Ehsan AQ, Obaid AS, Hussain AS, Nesar AM. Awake Airtraq intubation in an immobile neck–a case report. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2012; 63 (03) 135-137
  • 23 Sener EB, Sarihasan B, Ustun E, Kocamanoglu S, Kelsaka E, Tur A. Awake tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway in a patient with halo traction. Can J Anaesth 2002; 49 (06) 610-613
  • 24 Mahmoudpour A, Hoseinzadeh H, Far AP, Sanaie S. Awake tracheal intubation via intubating laryngeal mask versus direct laryngoscopy and cervical spine excursion. Pak J Med Sci 2007; 23 (02) 238-241
  • 25 Wong JK, Tongier WK, Armbruster SC, White PF. Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway to facilitate awake orotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine disorders. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11 (04) 346-348
  • 26 Dipaola CP, Conrad BP, Horodyski M, Dipaola MJ, Sawers A, Rechtine II GR. Cervical spine motion generated with manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric c1-c2 global instability model. Spine 2009; 34 (26) 2912-2918
  • 27 Bearden BG, Conrad BP, Horodyski M, Rechtine GR. Motion in the unstable cervical spine: comparison of manual turning and use of the Jackson table in prone positioning. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7 (02) 161-164
  • 28 Prasarn ML, Horodyski M, Dubose D. et al. Total motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during management of the typical trauma patient: a comparison of methods in a cadaver model. Spine 2012; 37 (11) 937-942
  • 29 DiPaola CP, Sawers A, Conrad BP. et al. Comparing cervical spine motion with different halo devices in a cadaveric cervical instability model. Spine 2009; 34 (02) 149-155
  • 30 Eger II EI, Raines DE, Shafer SL, Hemmings Jr HC, Sonner JM. Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?. Anesth Analg 2008; 107 (03) 832-848
  • 31 Hendrickx JF, Eger II EI, Sonner JM, Shafer SL. Is synergy the rule?. A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility. Anesth Analg 2008; 107 (02) 494-506
  • 32 Kungys G, Kim J, Jinks SL, Atherley RJ, Antognini JF. Propofol produces immobility via action in the ventral horn of the spinal cord by a GABAergic mechanism. Anesth Analg 2009; 108 (05) 1531-1537
  • 33 Stevens RD. et al. Critical care and perioperative management in traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2003; 15 (03) 215-229
  • 34 Pajewski TN, Arlet V, Phillips LH. Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (Suppl. 02) S115-S129
  • 35 Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR. The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference?. Spine 2010; 35 (09) Suppl S37-S46
  • 36 Deem S, Shapiro HM, Marshall LF. Quadriplegia in a patient with cervical spondylosis after thoracolumbar surgery in the prone position. Anesthesiology 1991; 75 (03) 527-528