Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(08): 557-567
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1687916
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reducing Length of Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction with a Standardized Postoperative Protocol

Matthew A. DelMauro
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, United States
,
Kevin Chen
1   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, United States
,
Alex Keller
2   Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine; Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 September 2018

04 March 2019

Publication Date:
01 May 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Despite widespread acceptance of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in other surgical specialties, plastic surgery has been slow to adopt fast-track principles. Recently, however, studies have shown that patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction may benefit from a comprehensive postoperative protocol.

Methods All microsurgical breast reconstructions with abdominal free flaps performed by the senior author (A.K.) at a single institution from June 2009 to December 2013 were reviewed. Demographic information (e.g., age, body mass index, and comorbidities), operative details (e.g., laterality, type of flap), and postoperative data (e.g., complications, length of stay) were collected from patients' medical records. The authors employed a universal comprehensive protocol that dictated all postoperative care as it relates to diet, ambulation, flap monitoring, anticoagulation, analgesia, venous thromboembolism, antibiotic prophylaxis, and discharge criteria.

Results During the study period, 161 patients underwent 289 free flaps. The average length of stay for all patients was 3.26 ± 1.19 days. The incidence of complications requiring return to the operating room was 4.35% (7 patients). The incidence of flap failure was 0.69% (2 of 289 flaps). Only one flap failure occurred after hospital discharge. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the presence of any complication requiring return to the operating room increased hospital course by an average of 1.37 days (p = 0.0027).

Conclusion The standardization of postoperative care for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction results in a short hospital length of stay without increasing the incidence of flap failure or postoperative complications requiring return to the operating room.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - enhanced recovery after surgery - DIEP flap

Financial Disclosure

Alex Keller has been a consultant to ViOptix, Inc. since 2005, the medical director from 2008 to 2015, and holds stock options in the company. Neither Matthew DelMauro nor Kevin Chen has any financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.


Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


 

  • References

  • 1 Holmström H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13 (03) 423-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Khouri RK. Free flap surgery. The second decade. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19 (04) 757-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bonde C, Khorasani H, Eriksen K, Wolthers M, Kehlet H, Elberg J. Introducing the fast track surgery principles can reduce length of stay after autologous breast reconstruction using free flaps: a case control study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015; 49 (06) 367-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bonde CT, Khorasani H, Elberg J, Kehlet H. Perioperative optimization of autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 411-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Batdorf NJ, Lemaine V, Lovely JK. , et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (03) 395-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Afonso A, Oskar S, Tan KS. , et al. Is enhanced recovery the new standard of care in microsurgical breast reconstruction?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1053-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jablonka EM, Lamelas AM, Kim JN. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane blocks with single-dose liposomal bupivacaine in conjunction with a nonnarcotic pain regimen help reduce length of stay following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (02) 240-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Astanehe A, Temple-Oberle C, Nielsen M. , et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction is safe and effective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (01) e1634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kaoutzanis C, Ganesh Kumar N, O'Neill D. , et al. Enhanced recovery pathway in microvascular autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: should it become the standard of care?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 841-851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Marsh M, Elliott S, Anand R, Brennan PA. Early postoperative care for free flap head & neck reconstructive surgery--a national survey of practice. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 47 (03) 182-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Abdel-Galil K, Mitchell D. Postoperative monitoring of microsurgical free-tissue transfers for head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review of current techniques--part II. Invasive techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 47 (06) 438-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Talesnik A, Markowitz B, Calcaterra T, Ahn C, Shaw W. Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (06) 1167-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Haddock NT, Gobble RM, Levine JP. More consistent postoperative care and monitoring can reduce costs following microvascular free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (07) 435-439
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jackson RS, Walker RJ, Varvares MA, Odell MJ. Postoperative monitoring in free tissue transfer patients: effective use of nursing and resident staff. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 141 (05) 621-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Godden DR, Patel M, Baldwin A, Woodwards RT. Need for intensive care after operations for head and neck cancer surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 37 (06) 502-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bhama PK, Davis GE, Bhrany AD, Lam DJ, Futran ND. The effects of intensive care unit staffing on patient outcomes following microvascular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: a pilot study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Arshad H, Ozer HG, Thatcher A. , et al. Intensive care unit versus non-intensive care unit postoperative management of head and neck free flaps: comparative effectiveness and cost comparisons. Head Neck 2014; 36 (04) 536-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP. , et al. Timing of pedicle thrombosis and flap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (07) 1230-1233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cornejo A, Ivatury S, Crane CN, Myers JG, Wang HT. Analysis of free flap complications and utilization of intensive care unit monitoring. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (07) 473-479
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chen K-T, Mardini S, Chuang DC. , et al. Timing of presentation of the first signs of vascular compromise dictates the salvage outcome of free flap transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 187-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bakri K, Moran SL. Monitoring for upper-extremity free flaps and replantations. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (10) 1905-1908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nelson JA, Kim EM, Eftekhari K. , et al. Late venous thrombosis in free flap breast reconstruction: strategies for salvage after this real entity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 8e-15e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Baltodano P, Schalet GN, Aliu O. , et al. Abstract P1. A national data-driven approach to optimizing monitoring of autologous breast free flap reconstruction: analysis of 3,666 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5: 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Keller A. A new diagnostic algorithm for early prediction of vascular compromise in 208 microsurgical flaps using tissue oxygen saturation measurements. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (05) 538-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lin SJ, Nguyen MD, Chen C. , et al. Tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction decreases flap loss and improves rate of flap salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1080-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lohman R, Langevin CJ, Bozkurt M. , et al. A prospective analysis of free flap monitoring techniques: physical examination, external Doppler, implantable Doppler, and tissue oximetry. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 29: 051-056
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Koolen PG, Vargas CR, Ho OA. , et al. Does increased experience with tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction lead to decreased flap loss? The learning effect. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (04) 1093-1101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Ho OA, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Evaluating the use of tissue oximetry to decrease intensive unit monitoring for free flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 42-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Taghinia AH, Lee BT. A novel free flap monitoring system using tissue oximetry with text message alerts. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (05) 415-420
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Reiffel AJ, Kamdar MR, Kadouch DJ, Rohde CH, Spector JA. Perioperative antibiotics in the setting of microvascular free tissue transfer: current practices. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (06) 401-407
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Drury KE, Lanier ST, Khavanin N. , et al. Impact of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis duration on surgical site infections in autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (02) 174-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cooley BC, Gould JS. Experimental models for evaluating antithrombotic therapies in replantation microsurgery. Microsurgery 1987; 8 (04) 230-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Peter FW, Steinau HU, Homann HH, Barker JH. Aspirin and microvascular surgery: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (05) 1368-1370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Blackwell KE. Unsurpassed reliability of free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125 (03) 295-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ritter EF, Cronan JC, Rudner AM, Serafin D, Klitzman B. Improved microsurgical anastomotic patency with low molecular weight heparin. J Reconstr Microsurg 1998; 14 (05) 331-336
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Murthy P, Riesberg MV, Hart S. , et al. Efficacy of perioperative thromboprophylactic agents in the maintenance of anastamotic patency and survival of rat microvascular free groin flaps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (03) 176-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Reiter M, Kapsreiter M, Betz CS, Harréus U. Perioperative management of antithrombotic medication in head and neck reconstruction-a retrospective analysis of 137 patients. Am J Otolaryngol 2012; 33 (06) 693-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Li X, Cooley BC. Effect of anticoagulation and inhibition of platelet aggregation on arterial versus venous microvascular thrombosis. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (02) 165-169 , discussion 169–170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Chung TL, Pumplin DW, Holton III LH, Taylor JA, Rodriguez ED, Silverman RP. Prevention of microsurgical anastomotic thrombosis using aspirin, heparin, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (05) 1281-1288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lighthall JG, Cain R, Ghanem TA, Wax MK. Effect of postoperative aspirin on outcomes in microvascular free tissue transfer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (01) 40-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, Campbell Jr DA, Caprini JA. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (02) 344-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Pannucci CJ, Bailey SH, Dreszer G. , et al. Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in plastic and reconstructive surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212 (01) 105-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Caprini JA. Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Dis Mon 2005; 51 (2-3): 70-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Murphy Jr RX, Alderman A, Gutowski K. , et al. Evidence-based practices for thromboembolism prevention: summary of the ASPS Venous Thromboembolism Task Force Report. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 168e-175e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Kim EK, Eom JS, Ahn SH, Son BH, Lee TJ. The efficacy of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent pulmonary thromboembolism in immediate breast reconstruction using the TRAM flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 9-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Liao EC, Taghinia AH, Nguyen LP, Yueh JH, May Jr JW, Orgill DP. Incidence of hematoma complication with heparin venous thrombosis prophylaxis after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (04) 1101-1107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Lemaine V, McCarthy C, Kaplan K. , et al. Venous thromboembolism following microsurgical breast reconstruction: an objective analysis in 225 consecutive patients using low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (04) 1399-1406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kroll SS, Sharma S, Koutz C. , et al; Evans GRD. Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (02) 338-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, Chalmers TC, Dear KB, Angelillo IF, Mosteller F. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5 (03) 182-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (04) CD003348
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Man D, Plosker H. The pain-control infusion pump for postoperative pain control in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 2169-2170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Pacik PT, Werner C, Jackson N, Lobsitz C. Pain control in augmentation mammaplasty: the use of indwelling catheters in 200 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (06) 2090-2096 , discussion 2097–2098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Baroody M, Tameo MN, Dabb RW. Efficacy of the pain pump catheter in immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (04) 895-898 , discussion 899–900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Mentz HA, Ruiz-Razura A, Newall G, Patronella CK. Use of a regional infusion pump to control postoperative pain after an abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (05) 415-421 , discussion 422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Paul MD. Breast augmentation and abdominoplasty: postoperative management with pain pumps. Aesthet Surg J 2005; 25 (01) 69-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Chavez-Abraham V, Barr JS, Zwiebel PC. The efficacy of a lidocaine-infused pain pump for postoperative analgesia following elective augmentation mammaplasty or abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (04) 463-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Heller L, Feledy JA, Chang DW. Strategies and options for free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients with midline abdominal scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (03) 753-759 , discussion 760–761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Tan KJ, Farrow H. Improving postoperative analgesia for transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction; the use of a local anaesthetic infusion catheter. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (02) 206-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Boehmler IV JH, Venturi ML, Nahabedian MY. Decreased narcotic use with an implantable local anesthetic catheter after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (06) 618-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Rawlani V, Kryger ZB, Lu L, Fine NA. A local anesthetic pump reduces postoperative pain and narcotic and antiemetic use in breast reconstruction surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (01) 39-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Losken A, Parris JJ, Douglas TD, Codner MA. Use of the infusion pain pump following transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (05) 479-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Gardiner MD, Nanchahal J. Strategies to ensure success of microvascular free tissue transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (09) e665-e673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R. , et al; Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238 (05) 641-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Haughey BH, Wilson E, Kluwe L. , et al. Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 125 (01) 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Clark JR, McCluskey SA, Hall F. , et al. Predictors of morbidity following free flap reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck. Head Neck 2007; 29 (12) 1090-1101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Zhong T, Neinstein R, Massey C. , et al. Intravenous fluid infusion rate in microsurgical breast reconstruction: important lessons learned from 354 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 1153-1160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Serletti JM. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (05) 714e-715e
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Ledinh W. , et al. Variables affecting postoperative tissue perfusion monitoring in free flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (02) 123-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Kyle B, Litton E, Ho KM. Effect of hyperoxia and vascular occlusion on tissue oxygenation measured by near infra-red spectroscopy (InSpectra™): a volunteer study. Anaesthesia 2012; 67 (11) 1237-1241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Manahan MA, Basdag B, Kalmar CL. , et al. Risk of severe and refractory postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (02) 112-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 340-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA. , et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 195-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Rozen WM, Anavekar NS, Ashton MW. , et al. Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve operative outcomes in breast reconstruction?. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (07) 516-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Wheble GAC, Tan EK, Turner M, Durrant CA, Heppell S. Surgeon-administered, intra-operative transversus abdominis plane block in autologous breast reconstruction: a UK hospital experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (12) 1665-1670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Giordano S, Veräjänkorva E, Koskivuo I, Suominen E. Effectiveness of local anaesthetic pain catheters for abdominal donor site analgesia in patients undergoing free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013; 47 (06) 428-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Heller L, Kowalski AM, Wei C, Butler CE. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of local anesthetic infusion and intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia pump for pain management after free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1010-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS, Choi M. Examining length of hospital stay after microsurgical breast reconstruction: evaluation in a case-control study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (12) e1588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Kwok AC, Simpson AM, Ye X, Tatro E, Agarwal JP. Immediate unilateral breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps: analysis of 3,310 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 74-82
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (05) 1100-1109 , discussion 1110–1111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu Q-Y, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2092-2100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Manson PN. Factors associated with anastomotic failure after microvascular reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (01) 74-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 792-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR. , et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 711-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Garvey PB, Villa MT, Rozanski AT, Liu J, Robb GL, Beahm EK. The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) 991-1000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Yim JH, Yun J, Lee TJ, Kim EK, Cho J, Eom JS. Outcomes of take-back operations in breast reconstruction with free lower abdominal flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42 (06) 741-745
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Jandali S, Nelson JA, Sonnad SS. , et al. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (06) 2206-2213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Khansa I, Chao AH, Taghizadeh M, Nagel T, Wang D, Tiwari P. A systematic approach to emergent breast free flap takeback: clinical outcomes, algorithm, and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (07) 505-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Selber JC, Samra F, Bristol M. , et al. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 348-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Selber JC, Angel Soto-Miranda M, Liu J, Robb G. The survival curve: factors impacting the outcome of free flap take-backs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 105-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Chubb D, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Acosta R, Grinsell D, Ashton MW. The efficacy of clinical assessment in the postoperative monitoring of free flaps: a review of 1140 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (04) 1157-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Miller RB, Reece G, Kroll SS. , et al. Microvascular breast reconstruction in the diabetic patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (01) 38-45 , discussion 46–48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Fosnot J, Jandali S, Low DW, Kovach III SJ, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Closer to an understanding of fate: the role of vascular complications in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (04) 835-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Chang EI, Carlsen BT, Festekjian JH, Da Lio AL, Crisera CA. Salvage rates of compromised free flap breast reconstruction after recurrent thrombosis. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (01) 68-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Wormald JCR, Wade RG, Figus A. The increased risk of adverse outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction compared to unilateral reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (02) 143-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL, Richrath P, Behrendt P, Andree C. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1086-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Ochoa O, Chrysopoulo M, Nastala C, Ledoux P, Pisano S. Abdominal wall stability and flap complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: does body mass index make a difference? Analysis of 418 patients and 639 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 21e-33e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Chubb D, Rozen WM, Ashton MW. Complete absence of the deep inferior epigastric artery: an increasingly detected anomaly detected with the use of advanced imaging technologies. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (03) 209-210
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Massenburg BB, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Ingargiola MJ, Rosa JH, Taub PJ. Flap failure and wound complications in autologous breast reconstruction: a national perspective. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015; 39 (06) 902-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Masoomi H, Clark EG, Paydar KZ. , et al. Predictive risk factors of free flap thrombosis in breast reconstruction surgery. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (08) 589-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Wang XL, Liu LB, Song FM, Wang QY. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014; 38 (04) 681-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Blondeel PN, Arnstein M, Verstraete K. , et al. Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (06) 1295-1299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Vijan SS, Tran VN. Microvascular breast reconstruction pedicle thrombosis: how long can we wait?. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (06) 544-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Smit JM, Acosta R, Zeebregts CJ, Liss AG, Anniko M, Hartman EH. Early reintervention of compromised free flaps improves success rate. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (07) 612-616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Rao S, Stolle EC, Sher S, Lin CW, Momen B, Nahabedian MY. A multiple logistic regression analysis of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2014; 3 (04) 226-231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Walker JA. What is the effect of preoperative information on patient satisfaction?. Br J Nurs 2007; 16 (01) 27-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Ho AL, Klassen AF, Cano S, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (02) 212e-220e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ. Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (03) 717-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar