Reducing Length of Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction with a Standardized Postoperative Protocol

Matthew A. DelMauro; Kevin Chen; Alex Keller

doi:10.1055/s-0039-1687916

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Table of Contents

J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(08): 557-567
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1687916

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reducing Length of Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction with a Standardized Postoperative Protocol

Matthew A. DelMauro

¹Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, United States

,

Kevin Chen

¹Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, United States

,

Alex Keller

²Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine; Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York, United States

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Despite widespread acceptance of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in other surgical specialties, plastic surgery has been slow to adopt fast-track principles. Recently, however, studies have shown that patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction may benefit from a comprehensive postoperative protocol.

Methods All microsurgical breast reconstructions with abdominal free flaps performed by the senior author (A.K.) at a single institution from June 2009 to December 2013 were reviewed. Demographic information (e.g., age, body mass index, and comorbidities), operative details (e.g., laterality, type of flap), and postoperative data (e.g., complications, length of stay) were collected from patients' medical records. The authors employed a universal comprehensive protocol that dictated all postoperative care as it relates to diet, ambulation, flap monitoring, anticoagulation, analgesia, venous thromboembolism, antibiotic prophylaxis, and discharge criteria.

Results During the study period, 161 patients underwent 289 free flaps. The average length of stay for all patients was 3.26 ± 1.19 days. The incidence of complications requiring return to the operating room was 4.35% (7 patients). The incidence of flap failure was 0.69% (2 of 289 flaps). Only one flap failure occurred after hospital discharge. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the presence of any complication requiring return to the operating room increased hospital course by an average of 1.37 days (p = 0.0027).

Conclusion The standardization of postoperative care for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction results in a short hospital length of stay without increasing the incidence of flap failure or postoperative complications requiring return to the operating room.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - enhanced recovery after surgery - DIEP flap

Full Text

References

References
1 Holmström H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13 (03) 423-427
2 Khouri RK. Free flap surgery. The second decade. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19 (04) 757-761
3 Bonde C, Khorasani H, Eriksen K, Wolthers M, Kehlet H, Elberg J. Introducing the fast track surgery principles can reduce length of stay after autologous breast reconstruction using free flaps: a case control study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015; 49 (06) 367-371
4 Bonde CT, Khorasani H, Elberg J, Kehlet H. Perioperative optimization of autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 411-414
5 Batdorf NJ, Lemaine V, Lovely JK. , et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (03) 395-402
6 Afonso A, Oskar S, Tan KS. , et al. Is enhanced recovery the new standard of care in microsurgical breast reconstruction?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1053-1061
7 Jablonka EM, Lamelas AM, Kim JN. , et al. Transversus abdominis plane blocks with single-dose liposomal bupivacaine in conjunction with a nonnarcotic pain regimen help reduce length of stay following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (02) 240-251
8 Astanehe A, Temple-Oberle C, Nielsen M. , et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction is safe and effective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (01) e1634
9 Kaoutzanis C, Ganesh Kumar N, O'Neill D. , et al. Enhanced recovery pathway in microvascular autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: should it become the standard of care?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 841-851
10 Marsh M, Elliott S, Anand R, Brennan PA. Early postoperative care for free flap head & neck reconstructive surgery--a national survey of practice. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 47 (03) 182-185
11 Abdel-Galil K, Mitchell D. Postoperative monitoring of microsurgical free-tissue transfers for head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review of current techniques--part II. Invasive techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 47 (06) 438-442
12 Talesnik A, Markowitz B, Calcaterra T, Ahn C, Shaw W. Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (06) 1167-1178
13 Haddock NT, Gobble RM, Levine JP. More consistent postoperative care and monitoring can reduce costs following microvascular free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (07) 435-439
14 Jackson RS, Walker RJ, Varvares MA, Odell MJ. Postoperative monitoring in free tissue transfer patients: effective use of nursing and resident staff. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 141 (05) 621-625
15 Godden DR, Patel M, Baldwin A, Woodwards RT. Need for intensive care after operations for head and neck cancer surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 37 (06) 502-505
16 Bhama PK, Davis GE, Bhrany AD, Lam DJ, Futran ND. The effects of intensive care unit staffing on patient outcomes following microvascular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: a pilot study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (01) 37-42
17 Arshad H, Ozer HG, Thatcher A. , et al. Intensive care unit versus non-intensive care unit postoperative management of head and neck free flaps: comparative effectiveness and cost comparisons. Head Neck 2014; 36 (04) 536-539
18 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP. , et al. Timing of pedicle thrombosis and flap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (07) 1230-1233
19 Cornejo A, Ivatury S, Crane CN, Myers JG, Wang HT. Analysis of free flap complications and utilization of intensive care unit monitoring. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (07) 473-479
20 Chen K-T, Mardini S, Chuang DC. , et al. Timing of presentation of the first signs of vascular compromise dictates the salvage outcome of free flap transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 187-195
21 Bakri K, Moran SL. Monitoring for upper-extremity free flaps and replantations. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (10) 1905-1908
22 Nelson JA, Kim EM, Eftekhari K. , et al. Late venous thrombosis in free flap breast reconstruction: strategies for salvage after this real entity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 8e-15e
23 Baltodano P, Schalet GN, Aliu O. , et al. Abstract P1. A national data-driven approach to optimizing monitoring of autologous breast free flap reconstruction: analysis of 3,666 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5: 1
24 Keller A. A new diagnostic algorithm for early prediction of vascular compromise in 208 microsurgical flaps using tissue oxygen saturation measurements. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (05) 538-543
25 Lin SJ, Nguyen MD, Chen C. , et al. Tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction decreases flap loss and improves rate of flap salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1080-1085
26 Lohman R, Langevin CJ, Bozkurt M. , et al. A prospective analysis of free flap monitoring techniques: physical examination, external Doppler, implantable Doppler, and tissue oximetry. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 29: 051-056
27 Koolen PG, Vargas CR, Ho OA. , et al. Does increased experience with tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction lead to decreased flap loss? The learning effect. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (04) 1093-1101
28 Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Ho OA, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Evaluating the use of tissue oximetry to decrease intensive unit monitoring for free flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 42-46
29 Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Taghinia AH, Lee BT. A novel free flap monitoring system using tissue oximetry with text message alerts. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (05) 415-420
30 Reiffel AJ, Kamdar MR, Kadouch DJ, Rohde CH, Spector JA. Perioperative antibiotics in the setting of microvascular free tissue transfer: current practices. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (06) 401-407
31 Drury KE, Lanier ST, Khavanin N. , et al. Impact of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis duration on surgical site infections in autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (02) 174-179
32 Cooley BC, Gould JS. Experimental models for evaluating antithrombotic therapies in replantation microsurgery. Microsurgery 1987; 8 (04) 230-233
33 Peter FW, Steinau HU, Homann HH, Barker JH. Aspirin and microvascular surgery: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (05) 1368-1370
34 Blackwell KE. Unsurpassed reliability of free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125 (03) 295-299
35 Ritter EF, Cronan JC, Rudner AM, Serafin D, Klitzman B. Improved microsurgical anastomotic patency with low molecular weight heparin. J Reconstr Microsurg 1998; 14 (05) 331-336
36 Murthy P, Riesberg MV, Hart S. , et al. Efficacy of perioperative thromboprophylactic agents in the maintenance of anastamotic patency and survival of rat microvascular free groin flaps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (03) 176-182
37 Reiter M, Kapsreiter M, Betz CS, Harréus U. Perioperative management of antithrombotic medication in head and neck reconstruction-a retrospective analysis of 137 patients. Am J Otolaryngol 2012; 33 (06) 693-696
38 Li X, Cooley BC. Effect of anticoagulation and inhibition of platelet aggregation on arterial versus venous microvascular thrombosis. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (02) 165-169 , discussion 169–170
39 Chung TL, Pumplin DW, Holton III LH, Taylor JA, Rodriguez ED, Silverman RP. Prevention of microsurgical anastomotic thrombosis using aspirin, heparin, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (05) 1281-1288
40 Lighthall JG, Cain R, Ghanem TA, Wax MK. Effect of postoperative aspirin on outcomes in microvascular free tissue transfer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (01) 40-46
41 Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, Campbell Jr DA, Caprini JA. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (02) 344-350
42 Pannucci CJ, Bailey SH, Dreszer G. , et al. Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in plastic and reconstructive surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212 (01) 105-112
43 Caprini JA. Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Dis Mon 2005; 51 (2-3): 70-78
44 Murphy Jr RX, Alderman A, Gutowski K. , et al. Evidence-based practices for thromboembolism prevention: summary of the ASPS Venous Thromboembolism Task Force Report. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 168e-175e
45 Kim EK, Eom JS, Ahn SH, Son BH, Lee TJ. The efficacy of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent pulmonary thromboembolism in immediate breast reconstruction using the TRAM flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 9-12
46 Liao EC, Taghinia AH, Nguyen LP, Yueh JH, May Jr JW, Orgill DP. Incidence of hematoma complication with heparin venous thrombosis prophylaxis after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (04) 1101-1107
47 Lemaine V, McCarthy C, Kaplan K. , et al. Venous thromboembolism following microsurgical breast reconstruction: an objective analysis in 225 consecutive patients using low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (04) 1399-1406
48 Kroll SS, Sharma S, Koutz C. , et al; Evans GRD. Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (02) 338-341
49 Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, Chalmers TC, Dear KB, Angelillo IF, Mosteller F. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5 (03) 182-193
50 Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (04) CD003348
51 Man D, Plosker H. The pain-control infusion pump for postoperative pain control in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 2169-2170
52 Pacik PT, Werner C, Jackson N, Lobsitz C. Pain control in augmentation mammaplasty: the use of indwelling catheters in 200 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (06) 2090-2096 , discussion 2097–2098
53 Baroody M, Tameo MN, Dabb RW. Efficacy of the pain pump catheter in immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (04) 895-898 , discussion 899–900
54 Mentz HA, Ruiz-Razura A, Newall G, Patronella CK. Use of a regional infusion pump to control postoperative pain after an abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (05) 415-421 , discussion 422
55 Paul MD. Breast augmentation and abdominoplasty: postoperative management with pain pumps. Aesthet Surg J 2005; 25 (01) 69-71
56 Chavez-Abraham V, Barr JS, Zwiebel PC. The efficacy of a lidocaine-infused pain pump for postoperative analgesia following elective augmentation mammaplasty or abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (04) 463-469
57 Heller L, Feledy JA, Chang DW. Strategies and options for free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients with midline abdominal scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (03) 753-759 , discussion 760–761
58 Tan KJ, Farrow H. Improving postoperative analgesia for transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction; the use of a local anaesthetic infusion catheter. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (02) 206-210
59 Boehmler IV JH, Venturi ML, Nahabedian MY. Decreased narcotic use with an implantable local anesthetic catheter after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (06) 618-620
60 Rawlani V, Kryger ZB, Lu L, Fine NA. A local anesthetic pump reduces postoperative pain and narcotic and antiemetic use in breast reconstruction surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (01) 39-52
61 Losken A, Parris JJ, Douglas TD, Codner MA. Use of the infusion pain pump following transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (05) 479-482
62 Gardiner MD, Nanchahal J. Strategies to ensure success of microvascular free tissue transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (09) e665-e673
63 Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R. , et al; Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238 (05) 641-648
64 Haughey BH, Wilson E, Kluwe L. , et al. Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 125 (01) 10-17
65 Clark JR, McCluskey SA, Hall F. , et al. Predictors of morbidity following free flap reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck. Head Neck 2007; 29 (12) 1090-1101
66 Zhong T, Neinstein R, Massey C. , et al. Intravenous fluid infusion rate in microsurgical breast reconstruction: important lessons learned from 354 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 1153-1160
67 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Serletti JM. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (05) 714e-715e
68 Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Ledinh W. , et al. Variables affecting postoperative tissue perfusion monitoring in free flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (02) 123-128
69 Kyle B, Litton E, Ho KM. Effect of hyperoxia and vascular occlusion on tissue oxygenation measured by near infra-red spectroscopy (InSpectra™): a volunteer study. Anaesthesia 2012; 67 (11) 1237-1241
70 Manahan MA, Basdag B, Kalmar CL. , et al. Risk of severe and refractory postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (02) 112-121
71 Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 340-347
72 Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA. , et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 195-203
73 Rozen WM, Anavekar NS, Ashton MW. , et al. Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve operative outcomes in breast reconstruction?. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (07) 516-523
74 Wheble GAC, Tan EK, Turner M, Durrant CA, Heppell S. Surgeon-administered, intra-operative transversus abdominis plane block in autologous breast reconstruction: a UK hospital experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (12) 1665-1670
75 Giordano S, Veräjänkorva E, Koskivuo I, Suominen E. Effectiveness of local anaesthetic pain catheters for abdominal donor site analgesia in patients undergoing free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013; 47 (06) 428-433
76 Heller L, Kowalski AM, Wei C, Butler CE. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of local anesthetic infusion and intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia pump for pain management after free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1010-1018
77 Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS, Choi M. Examining length of hospital stay after microsurgical breast reconstruction: evaluation in a case-control study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (12) e1588
78 Kwok AC, Simpson AM, Ye X, Tatro E, Agarwal JP. Immediate unilateral breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps: analysis of 3,310 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 74-82
79 Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (05) 1100-1109 , discussion 1110–1111
80 Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu Q-Y, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2092-2100
81 Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Manson PN. Factors associated with anastomotic failure after microvascular reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (01) 74-82
82 Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 792-798
83 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR. , et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 711-721
84 Garvey PB, Villa MT, Rozanski AT, Liu J, Robb GL, Beahm EK. The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) 991-1000
85 Yim JH, Yun J, Lee TJ, Kim EK, Cho J, Eom JS. Outcomes of take-back operations in breast reconstruction with free lower abdominal flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42 (06) 741-745
86 Jandali S, Nelson JA, Sonnad SS. , et al. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (06) 2206-2213
87 Khansa I, Chao AH, Taghizadeh M, Nagel T, Wang D, Tiwari P. A systematic approach to emergent breast free flap takeback: clinical outcomes, algorithm, and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (07) 505-513
88 Selber JC, Samra F, Bristol M. , et al. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 348-355
89 Selber JC, Angel Soto-Miranda M, Liu J, Robb G. The survival curve: factors impacting the outcome of free flap take-backs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 105-113
90 Chubb D, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Acosta R, Grinsell D, Ashton MW. The efficacy of clinical assessment in the postoperative monitoring of free flaps: a review of 1140 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (04) 1157-1166
91 Miller RB, Reece G, Kroll SS. , et al. Microvascular breast reconstruction in the diabetic patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (01) 38-45 , discussion 46–48
92 Fosnot J, Jandali S, Low DW, Kovach III SJ, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Closer to an understanding of fate: the role of vascular complications in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (04) 835-843
93 Chang EI, Carlsen BT, Festekjian JH, Da Lio AL, Crisera CA. Salvage rates of compromised free flap breast reconstruction after recurrent thrombosis. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (01) 68-71
94 Wormald JCR, Wade RG, Figus A. The increased risk of adverse outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction compared to unilateral reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (02) 143-156
95 Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL, Richrath P, Behrendt P, Andree C. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1086-1092
96 Ochoa O, Chrysopoulo M, Nastala C, Ledoux P, Pisano S. Abdominal wall stability and flap complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: does body mass index make a difference? Analysis of 418 patients and 639 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 21e-33e
97 Chubb D, Rozen WM, Ashton MW. Complete absence of the deep inferior epigastric artery: an increasingly detected anomaly detected with the use of advanced imaging technologies. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (03) 209-210
98 Massenburg BB, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Ingargiola MJ, Rosa JH, Taub PJ. Flap failure and wound complications in autologous breast reconstruction: a national perspective. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015; 39 (06) 902-909
99 Masoomi H, Clark EG, Paydar KZ. , et al. Predictive risk factors of free flap thrombosis in breast reconstruction surgery. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (08) 589-594
100 Wang XL, Liu LB, Song FM, Wang QY. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014; 38 (04) 681-691
101 Blondeel PN, Arnstein M, Verstraete K. , et al. Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (06) 1295-1299
102 Vijan SS, Tran VN. Microvascular breast reconstruction pedicle thrombosis: how long can we wait?. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (06) 544-547
103 Smit JM, Acosta R, Zeebregts CJ, Liss AG, Anniko M, Hartman EH. Early reintervention of compromised free flaps improves success rate. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (07) 612-616
104 Rao S, Stolle EC, Sher S, Lin CW, Momen B, Nahabedian MY. A multiple logistic regression analysis of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2014; 3 (04) 226-231
105 Walker JA. What is the effect of preoperative information on patient satisfaction?. Br J Nurs 2007; 16 (01) 27-32
106 Ho AL, Klassen AF, Cano S, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (02) 212e-220e
107 Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ. Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (03) 717-724