J Wrist Surg 2019; 08(04): 280-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683845
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Impact of Design on Force between Flexor Tendons and Distal Radius Volar Plates

Katharine M. Hinchcliff
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California–Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
,
Ido Volk
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
,
Xenia Ivanova
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
,
Sandra Taylor
3   Department of Public Health, University of California–Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
,
Robert M. Szabo
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
› Author Affiliations
Funding The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (Grant # UL1 TR001860). Funding for the cadaver arms and plates was provided by a generous educational grant from Medartis.
Further Information

Publication History

27 October 2018

06 February 2019

Publication Date:
25 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Flexor tendon injury is a rare but serious complication of distal radius volar plating.

Purpose This study aims to determine whether the design of distal radius volar plates impacts the amount of force exerted on the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendons when the plates are placed proximal and distal to the watershed line.

Methods Three commercially available plates were applied to 10 fresh, matched-pair upper extremity specimens. Cyclical loading was applied to the tendons, and the force generated between tendon and plate was measured. Linear mixed effect models were used to evaluate differences in maximum and mean forces by plate position, plate design, and the interaction between position and design.

Results Forces on the tendons differed significantly by position but not plate design. For the FPL tendon, the average maximum force with a plate in Soong's grade 2 was 4.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8–7.3) times higher than when the plate was in a Soong's grade 0 placement, and 4.63 (95% CI: 2.82–7.61) times higher for the FDP tendon. While not statistically significant, lower observed force values with thinner plates when plates were placed distal to the watershed line suggest that that plate thickness could also be a critical plate characteristic for distally placed plates.

Conclusion Despite differences in plate design, the main determinant of plate prominence and therefore flexor tendon injury potential is placement in relation to the watershed line.

Clinical Relevance This study may help to guide surgeon implant selection and volar plate design.

Note

This article, entitled “Impact of Design on Force between the Tendons and Distal Radius Volar Plates,” and its authors adhere to the ethical standards described by the Committee on Publication Ethics and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.


Authors' Contributions

Dr. K.M.H. is principally responsible for the experimental design, cadaver testing, and manuscript preparation. Dr. I.V. and Ms. X.I. assisted with experimental design and cadaver testing. Author X.I. additionally played a significant role in experimental design and execution, including motor and sensor calibration. Dr. S.T. was the principal statistician and is also responsible for [Fig. 4] and [Table 1]. Dr. R.M.S., as the senior author of this manuscript, provided invaluable guidance regarding experimental design, as well as critical manuscript editing. All of the authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.


 
  • References

  • 1 Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (05) 908-915
  • 2 Shauver MJ, Yin H, Banerjee M, Chung KC. Current and future national costs to medicare for the treatment of distal radius fracture in the elderly. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (08) 1282-1287
  • 3 Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (09) 1944-1951
  • 4 Grewal R, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Faber KJ. Open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous pinning with external fixation of distal radius fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (12) 1899-1906
  • 5 Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM. Predictors of functional outcomes after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (01) 76-83
  • 6 Bentohami A, de Burlet K, de Korte N, van den Bekerom MP, Goslings JC, Schep NW. Complications following volar locking plate fixation for distal radial fractures: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39 (07) 745-754
  • 7 Al-Rashid M, Theivendran K, Craigen MA. Delayed ruptures of the extensor tendon secondary to the use of volar locking compression plates for distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (12) 1610-1612
  • 8 Soong M, Earp BE, Bishop G, Leung A, Blazar P. Volar locking plate implant prominence and flexor tendon rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (04) 328-335
  • 9 White BD, Nydick JA, Karsky D, Williams BD, Hess AV, Stone JD. Incidence and clinical outcomes of tendon rupture following distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (10) 2035-2040
  • 10 Azzi AJ, Aldekhayel S, Boehm KS, Zadeh T. Tendon rupture and tenosynovitis following internal fixation of distal radius fractures: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 717e-724e
  • 11 Asadollahi S, Keith PP. Flexor tendon injuries following plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a systematic review of the literature. J Orthop Traumatol 2013; 14 (04) 227-234
  • 12 Monaco NA, Dwyer CL, Ferikes AJ, Lubahn JD. Hand surgeon reporting of tendon rupture following distal radius volar plating. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (03) 278-286
  • 13 Kitay A, Swanstrom M, Schreiber JJ. , et al. Volar plate position and flexor tendon rupture following distal radius fracture fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (06) 1091-1096
  • 14 Limthongthang R, Bachoura A, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL. Distal radius volar locking plate design and associated vulnerability of the flexor pollicis longus. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (05) 852-860
  • 15 Matityahu AM, Lapalme SN, Seth A, Marmor MT, Buckley JM, Lattanza LL. How placement affects force and contact pressure between a volar plate of the distal radius and the flexor pollicus longus tendon: a biomechanical investigation. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38 (02) 144-150
  • 16 Wurtzel CNW, Burns GT, Zhu AF, Ozer K. Effects of volar tilt, wrist extension, and plate position on contact between flexor pollicis longus tendon and volar plate. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (12) 996-1001
  • 17 Tanaka Y, Aoki M, Izumi T, Fujimiya M, Yamashita T, Imai T. Effect of distal radius volar plate position on contact pressure between the flexor pollicis longus tendon and the distal plate edge. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (11) 1790-1797
  • 18 Hershman SH, Immerman I, Bechtel C, Lekic N, Paksima N, Egol KA. The effects of pronator quadratus repair on outcomes after volar plating of distal radius fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27 (03) 130-133
  • 19 Brown EN, Lifchez SD. Flexor pollicis longus tendon rupture after volar plating of a distal radius fracture: pronator quadratus plate coverage may not adequately protect tendons. Eplasty 2011; 11: e43
  • 20 Orbay JL. The treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with volar fixation. Hand Surg 2000; 5 (02) 103-112
  • 21 Shauver MJ, Clapham PJ, Chung KC. An economic analysis of outcomes and complications of treating distal radius fractures in the elderly. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (12) 1912-8.e1 , 3
  • 22 Lutsky KF, Beredjiklian PK, Hioe S, Bilello J, Kim N, Matzon JL. Incidence of hardware removal following volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (12) 2410-2415
  • 23 Snoddy MC, An TJ, Hooe BS, Kay HF, Lee DH, Pappas ND. Incidence and reasons for hardware removal following operative fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (03) 505-507
  • 24 Tahririan MA, Javdan M, Motififard M. Results of pronator quadratus repair in distal radius fractures to prevent tendon ruptures. Indian J Orthop 2014; 48 (04) 399-403
  • 25 Sinicropi SM, Su BW, Raia FJ, Parisien M, Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP. The effects of implant composition on extensor tenosynovitis in a canine distal radius fracture model. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (02) 300-307
  • 26 Althausen PL, Szabo RM. Coverage of distal radius internal fixation and wrist fusion devices with AlloDerm. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2004; 8 (04) 266-268
  • 27 Buzzell JE, Weikert DR, Watson JT, Lee DH. Precontoured fixed-angle volar distal radius plates: a comparison of anatomic fit. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (07) 1144-1152
  • 28 Soong M, van Leerdam R, Guitton TG, Got C, Katarincic J, Ring D. Fracture of the distal radius: risk factors for complications after locked volar plate fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (01) 3-9
  • 29 Kim SJ, Jo YH, Choi WS. , et al. Biomechanical properties of 3-dimensional printed volar locking distal radius plate: comparison with conventional volar locking plate. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (09) 747.e1-747.e6