Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683358
Evolution in Private Practice Interventional Radiology: Data Mining Trends in Procedure Volumes
Publication History
Publication Date:
29 March 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/sir/201901/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0039-1683358_001129-1.jpg)
Abstract
Diversity of procedures is a mainstay of interventional radiology (IR) and the ability to adapt and acquire new procedural skills is a benefit in a constantly changing medical environment. Strategies for success include building direct referral patterns from primary care providers, fostering strong interpersonal relationships with referring services, and providing efficient care coordinated through a dedicated IR clinic. In this study, retrospective analysis of procedural volumes over 16 years within a single large private IR practice was performed to examine the evolution of private practice IR. Primary data are presented, with analysis of the internal and external factors that have determined current procedural scope.
-
References
- 1 Murphy TP, Soares GM. The evolution of interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol 2005; 22 (01) 6-9
- 2 Sunshine JH, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M. A portrait of interventional radiologists in the United States. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185 (05) 1103-1112
- 3 Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ. , et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (06) 569-579
- 4 Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR. , et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (06) 557-568
- 5 Siskin G. Outpatient care of the interventional radiology patient. Semin Intervent Radiol 2006; 23 (04) 337-345
- 6 Drucker EA, Brennan TA. The turf war over peripheral vascular intervention. Part I. Setting the stage. Radiology 1994; 193 (02) 81A-86A
- 7 Duszak Jr R, Chatterjee AR, Schneider DA. National fluid shifts: fifteen-year trends in paracentesis and thoracentesis procedures. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7 (11) 859-864