Semin intervent Radiol 2019; 36(01): 003-009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683356
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Interventional Radiology Private Practice Patterns

Steven Peck
1   Advanced Medical Imaging Consultants, Fort Collins, Colorado
,
Jeffrey Van Erp
2   Advanced Radiology Services, PC, Grand Rapids, Michigan
,
John Watabe
3   Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
,
Mary Costantino
4   Comprehensive Interventional Care Centers, Portland, Oregon
,
Manish K. Varma
2   Advanced Radiology Services, PC, Grand Rapids, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Private practice interventional radiology (IR) in the US takes many forms – from specialty coverage withing traditional diagnostic radiology (DR) models and hybrid IR/DR practices, to multispecialty groups and independent IR practitioners. The purpose of this article is to understand the value each of these current IR models offer and predict their future viability.

 
  • Suggested Reading

  • 1 Jay B, Ahn SH. Vertebroplasty. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013; 30 (03) 297-306
  • 2 Lipnik AJ, Pandhi MB, Khabbaz RC, Gaba RC. Endovascular treatment for variceal hemorrhage: TIPS, BRTO, and combined approaches. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018; 35 (03) 169-184
  • 3 Kash B, Tan D. Physician group practice trends: a comprehensive review. Texas: Insight Medical Publishing; 2016
  • 4 2016 Survey of America's Physicians: practice patterns and perspectives. The Physicians Foundation, September 21, 2016
  • 5 Dargan R. Radiology salaries showed impressive gains in 2016. RSNA News. July 27, 2017
  • 6 Jackson WL. Radiology consolidation: an update on the practice landscape. Diagnostic Imaging. March 21, 2013
  • 7 Moser JW. 2007 survey of radiologists: practice characteristics, ownership, and affiliation with imaging centers. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 5 (09) 965-971
  • 8 Cypel YS, Sunshine JH. Basic characteristics of radiology practices: results from the American College of Radiology's 1999 survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 (02) 341-349