CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019; 41(05): 348-351
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683354
Case Report
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

In Vitro Fertilization and Vasa Previa: A Report of Two Cases

Fertilização in vitro e vasa previa: relato de dois casos
1   Service of Fetal Medicine, Medicina Fetal Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
2   Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Cristiano Caetano Salazar
2   Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
3   Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Cleisson Fábio Andrioli Peralta
4   Service of Fetal Medicine, Gestar Centro de Medicina Fetal, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Juliana Moysés Leite Abdalla
4   Service of Fetal Medicine, Gestar Centro de Medicina Fetal, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Janete Vettorazzi
1   Service of Fetal Medicine, Medicina Fetal Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
2   Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
3   Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
5   Postgraduation Program in Health Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 September 2018

28 January 2019

Publication Date:
02 April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Vasa previa (VP) is a dangerous obstetric condition associated with perinatal mortality and morbidity. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a risk factor for VP due to the high incidence of abnormal placentation. The diagnosis should be made prenatally, because fetal mortality can be extremely high. We report two cases to demonstrate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of VP. A 40-year-old primiparous Caucasian woman with IVF pregnancy was diagnosed with VP at 29 weeks of gestation and was hospitalized for observation at 31 weeks of gestation. She delivered a male newborn weighing 2,380 g, with an Apgar score of 10 at 5 minutes, by elective cesarean section at 34 weeks + 4 days of gestation, without complications. A 36-year-old primiparous Caucasian woman with IVF pregnancy was diagnosed with placenta previa, bilobed placenta increta and VP. The cord insertion was velamentous. She was hospitalized for observation at 26 weeks of gestation. She delivered a female newborn weighing 2,140 g, with an Apgar score of 9 at 5 minutes, by emergency cesarean section at 33 weeks + 4 days of gestation due to vaginal bleeding. The prenatal diagnosis of VP was associated with a favorable outcome in the two cases, supporting previous observations that IVF is a risk factor for VP and that all IVF pregnancies should be screened by transvaginal ultrasound.

Resumo

Vasa previa (VP) é uma condição obstétrica perigosa associada a mortalidade e morbidade perinatais. Fertilização in vitro (FIV) é um fator de risco para VP devido à alta incidência de placentação anormal. O diagnóstico deve ser realizado no período pré-natal, pois a possibilidade de mortalidade fetal é extremamente elevada. Relatamos dois casos para demonstrar a acurácia da ultrassonografia transvaginal no diagnóstico pré-natal de VP. Mulher caucasiana, primigesta, de 40 anos, submetida a FIV, foi diagnosticada com VP na 29ª semana de gestação e hospitalizada para observação na 31ª semana de gestação. A paciente foi submetida à cesariana eletiva com 34 semanas e 4 dias, sem complicações, com recém-nascido do sexo masculino, pesando 2.380 g, e com Apgar de 10 no 5° minuto. Mulher caucasiana, primigesta, de 36 anos, subetida a FIV, foi diagnosticada com placenta prévia, placenta bilobada, acretismo placentário e VP. Cordão umbilical com inserção velamentosa. A paciente foi hospitalizada para observação na 26ª semana de gestação. Foi submetida à cesariana de emergência com 33 semanas e 4 dias por sangramento vaginal. O recém nascido do sexo feminino pesou 2.140 g, com Apgar de 9 no 5°minuto. O diagnóstico de VP no período pré-natal associou-se a um desfecho favorável nos dois casos, corroborando observações anteriores de que a FIV é um fator de risco para VP e de que todas as gestações por FIV deveriam ser avaliadas por ultrassonografia transvaginal.

 
  • References

  • 1 Society of Maternal-Fetal (SMFM) Publications Committee. Sinkey RG, Odibo AO, Dashe JS. #37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 615-619 . Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.031
  • 2 Catanzarite V, Maida C, Thomas W, Mendoza A, Stanco L, Piacquadio KM. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa: ultrasound findings and obstetric outcome in ten cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18 (02) 109-115 . Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00448.x
  • 3 Hasegawa J, Farina A, Nakamura M. , et al. Analysis of the ultrasonographic findings predictive of vasa previa. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30 (12-13): 1121-1125 . Doi: 10.1002/pd.2618
  • 4 Bronsteen R, Whitten A, Balasubramanian M. , et al. Vasa previa: clinical presentations, outcomes, and implications for management. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (2 Pt 1): 352-357 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829cac58
  • 5 Baulies S, Maiz N, Muñoz A, Torrents M, Echevarría M, Serra B. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of vasa praevia and analysis of risk factors. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27 (07) 595-599 . Doi: 10.1002/pd.1753
  • 6 Pirtea LC, Grigoraş D, Sas I. , et al. In vitro fertilization represents a risk factor for vasa praevia. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2016; 57 (2, Suppl) 627-632
  • 7 Sinkey RG, Odibo AO. Vasa previa screening strategies: decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52 (04) 522-529 . Doi: 10.1002/uog.19098
  • 8 Jauniaux E, Englert Y, Vanesse M, Hiden M, Wilkin P. Pathologic features of placentas from singleton pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76 (01) 61-64
  • 9 Englert Y, Imbert MC, Van Rosendael E. , et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2 (02) 155-157 . Doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136500
  • 10 Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, von Düring V, Skjaerven R, Vatten LJ. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (09) 2353-2358 . Doi: 10.1093/humrep/del153
  • 11 Farhi J, Ben-Haroush A, Andrawus N. , et al. High serum oestradiol concentrations in IVF cycles increase the risk of pregnancy complications related to abnormal placentation. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21 (03) 331-337 . Doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.022
  • 12 Simón C, Cano F, Valbuena D, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (09) 2432-2437 . Doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136313
  • 13 Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J. , et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (01) 265-274 . Doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep376
  • 14 Ruiter L, Kok N, Limpens J. , et al. Systematic review of accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45 (05) 516-522 . Doi: 10.1002/uog.14752
  • 15 Sullivan EA, Javid N, Duncombe G. , et al. Vasa previa diagnosis, clinical practice, and outcomes in Australia. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (03) 591-598 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002198