J Hand Microsurg 2019; 11(03): 134-139
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681115
Original Article
Society of Indian Hand & Microsurgeons

Comparison of Single-Dose Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block and Continuous Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Applications in the Treatment of Finger Amputations

Mehmet Sukru Sahin
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Alanya Teaching and Medical Research Center, Baskent University, Alanya, Turkey
,
Gokhan Cakmak
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Alanya Teaching and Medical Research Center, Baskent University, Alanya, Turkey
,
Tayfun Birtay
2   Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Alanya Teaching and Medical Research Centre, Baskent University, Alanya, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 16 July 2018

Accepted after revision: 09 January 2019

Publication Date:
01 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study is to evaluate the replantation success of single-dose infraclavicular brachial plexus block and continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block (CIBPB) applied with bupivacaine and prilocaine in patients with finger amputation.

Materials and Methods This prospective randomized nonblinded study was conducted between January 2012 and September 2017, and 47 patients, all male, were included. Patients were randomly separated into two groups as 23 patients CIBPB applied group (group A) and 24 patients single-dose infraclavicular block applied group (group B). In group B, after the effect of block is ceased, intravenous patient-controlled (PC) opioid analgesia and, where necessary, 1 mg/kg meperidine and 75 mg diclofenac sodium intramuscularly were alternately administered at 4 to 6 hours intervals. The average ages were 30.7 ± 10.06 and 29 ± 9.08, respectively. Replantations were applied as being two venous anastomoses to one artery, where possible. Hourly skin temperatures of fingers of the hands in which both surgeries applied and no surgery applied in both the groups were measured for 3 days with an infrared thermometer. Also, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) evaluations in both the groups were performed in 3-hour intervals for 3 days.

Results Replantations were successful in 22 patients in whom CIBPB was applied (95.6%) and in 19 patients in whom single block was applied (79.16%). Regarding the finger temperatures, no significant difference was detected between both the groups for 3 days following the operation. No significant difference was found between the length of hospital stays (4.73 ± 2.21—4.71 ± 1.53) and duration of operations (2.90 ± 0.73—2.83 ± 0.58). There was no significant difference between the temperature values of both the groups. NRS scores of group A were statistically significantly lower than those of group B.

Conclusion In this prospective randomized study performed by using bupivacaine and prilocaine on 24 patients, the success rate of finger replantations with CIBPB was found to be higher. CIBPB is a very beneficial method that should be taken in consideration in hand injuries with anastomosis and high risk of vasospasm. Further studies with more number of cases would help reduce the question marks related with the success of this method.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ansbro FP, Blundell AE, Hernandez WE, Carter JV. Brachial plexus block. Am J Surg 1958; 95 (06) 953-962
  • 2 Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence. Anesth Analg 2011; 113 (04) 904-925
  • 3 Singh G, Cherian VT, Thomas BP. Low-concentration, continuous brachial plexus block in the management of purple glove syndrome: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2010; 4: 1-4
  • 4 Su HH, Lui PW, Yu CL. et al. The effects of continuous axillary brachial plexus block with ropivacaine infusion on skin temperature and survival of crushed fingers after microsurgical replantation. Chang Gung Med J 2005; 28 (08) 567-574
  • 5 Berger A, Tizian C, Zenz M. Continuous plexus blockade for improved circulation in microvascular surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1985; 14 (01) 16-19
  • 6 Kurt E, Ozturk S, Işik S, Zor F. Continuous brachial plexus blockade for digital replantations and toe-to-hand transfers. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (01) 24-27
  • 7 Niazi AU, El-Beheiry H, Ramlogan R, Graham B, von Schroeder HP, Tumber PS. Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: effect on survival of replanted digits. Hand Surg 2013; 18 (03) 325-330
  • 8 Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006; 10 (03) 124-129
  • 9 Lierz P, Schroegendorfer K, Choi S, Felleiter P, Kress HG. Continuous blockade of both brachial plexus with ropivacaine in phantom pain: a case report. Pain 1998; 78 (02) 135-137
  • 10 Chapman CR, Cox GB. Determinants of anxiety in elective surgery patients. In: Spielberger CB. ed. Stress and Anxiety. Vol. 4. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1978: 332
  • 11 Bergman BD, Hebl JR, Kent J, Horlocker T. Neurologic complications of 405 consecutive continuous axillary catheters. Anesth Analg 2003; 96 (01) 247-252
  • 12 Satapathy AR, Coventry DM. Axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011; 2011: 173796
  • 13 Hussussian CJ, Levis CM, Mackinnon SE. Plastic and hand surgery. In: Doherty GM. ed. The Washington Manual of Surgery. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott W & W; 1999: 502
  • 14 Liu SS, Salinas FV. Continuous plexus and peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 96 (01) 263-272
  • 15 Cankar K, Arnez ZM, Finderle Z, strucl M. Microvascular skin response to local cooling and body tilt early after digital replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (03) 552-558
  • 16 Pederson WC. Replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (03) 823-841
  • 17 Marino ER, Afra R, Loland VJ. at al. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block via an ultrasound-guided posterior approach: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 2009; 5: 1688-1694
  • 18 Chiu CH, Kuo YW, Hsu HT, Chu KS, Shieh CF. Continuous infraclavicular block for forearm amputation after being bitten by a saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus): a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2009; 25 (08) 455-459
  • 19 Bigeleisen P, Wilson M. A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96 (04) 502-507
  • 20 Zencirci B. Comparison of nerve stimulator and ultrasonography as the techniques applied for brachial plexus anesthesia. Int Arch Med 2011; 4 (01) 4
  • 21 Amiri HR, Espandar R. Upper extremity surgery in younger children under ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a case series. J Child Orthop 2010; 4 (04) 315-319
  • 22 Breschan C, Kraschl R, Jost R, Marhofer P, Likar R. Axillary brachial plexus block for treatment of severe forearm ischemia after arterial cannulation in an extremely low birth-weight infant. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14 (08) 681-684
  • 23 Ahsan ZS, Carvalho B, Yao J. Incidence of failure of continuous peripheral nerve catheters for postoperative analgesia in upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (02) 324-329
  • 24 Kostas P, Ioannis K, Fotis P. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block: a rare cause of pleural effusion. Arch Bronconeumol 2009; 45: 60-63
  • 25 Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO. Neural blockade. In: Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain, Part I: Pharmacology and Physiology of Neural Blockade. New York, NY: Lippincott-Raven; 1998: 97-129
  • 26 Duma A, Urbanek B, Sitzwohl C, Kreiger A, Zimpfer M, Kapral S. Clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic axillary brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94 (01) 112-116
  • 27 Pihlajamäki KK, Lindberg RL. Bupivacaine with and without adrenaline in interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59 (11) 1420-1424
  • 28 Hebl JR, Horlocker T, Sorenson EJ, Schroeder DR. Regional anesthesia does not increase the risk of postoperative neuropathy in patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition. Anesth Analg 2001; 93 (06) 1606-1611
  • 29 Roth JV. Regional anesthesia: another use for the ultrasound vessel finder. Anesth Analg 2003; 97 (06) 1857