CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2019; 08(01): 047-052
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677962
Original Article
Neurological Surgeons' Society of India

Simultaneous Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgery: Retrospective Analysis of 45 Cases

Amit Babasaheb Aiwale
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Care Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Pankajkumar Ranchhodbhai Patel
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Care Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Syed Ameer Basha Paspala
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Care Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
T. V. Ramakrishna Murthy
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Care Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 06 July 2018

Accepted: 30 July 2018

Publication Date:
27 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background The term ‘tandem spinal stenosis’ (TSS) was first introduced by Dagi et al to describe concurrent symptomatic cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis. A typical clinical picture includes intermittent neurogenic claudication, myelopathy, and polyradiculopathy in both the upper and lower extremities. The incidence of TSS ranges from 0.12 to 28%.

Methods We studied patients who presented with tandem canal stenosis and operated cervicolumbar decompression with or without fusion procedures by two separate neurosurgical teams simultaneously from June 2015 to 2017 with follow-up period of minimum 6 months.

Results We had 30 (66.66%) male and 15 (33.33%) female patients who underwent simultaneous cervical and lumbar spine surgeries. The average age was 57.8 years (male) and 53.9 years (female). Cervical canal stenosis was graded as per magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphological grades of stenosis by Kang et al and lumbar grading, was done as per Schizas et al grading system. The mean duration of complaints in cervical and lumbar compression was 29.54 ± 44.99 months and 30.55 ± 38.11 months, respectively. The mean preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score of was 10.46 ± 1.39, whereas the postoperative mean JOA score was 11.93 ± 1.28, and mean preoperative (38.59 ± 16.52) and postoperative (29.22 ± 9.38) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion Patients with TSS are elderly and have associated comorbidities, still simultaneous cervical and lumbar surgery is feasible with the good outcome if you have two neurosurgical teams operating simultaneously and having good other super specialty teams’ support. It can be timesaving and cost effective for patients. Also, it avoids patients from undergoing exposure to two separate surgical and anesthetic stress.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dagi TF, Tarkington MA, Leech JJ. Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis. Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression. J Neurosurg 1987; 66 (06) 842-849
  • 2 Epstein NE, Epstein JA, Carras R, Murthy VS, Hyman RA. Coexisting cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery 1984; 15 (04) 489-496
  • 3 Aydogan M, Ozturk C, Mirzanli C, Karatoprak O, Tezer M, Hamzaoglu A. Treatment approach in tandem (concurrent) cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Belg 2007; 73 (02) 234-237
  • 4 Kikuike K, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, Shimizu K. One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22 (08) 593-601
  • 5 Kang Y, Lee JW, Koh YH. et al. New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (01) W134-40
  • 6 Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A. et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine 2010; 35 (21) 1919-1924
  • 7 Williams KE, Paul R, Dewan Y. Functional outcome of corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Indian J Orthop 2009; 43 (02) 205-209
  • 8 Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000; 25 (22) 2940-2952 discussion 2952
  • 9 Teng P, Papatheodorou C. Combined cervical and lumbar spondylosis. Arch Neurol 1964; 10: 298-307
  • 10 Benini A. Zervikale und lumbale Stenose. In: Benini A. ed. Ischias ohne Bandscheibenvorfall: Die Stenose des lumbalen Wirbelkanal. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber; 1986: 84
  • 11 Eskander MS, Aubin ME, Drew JM. et al. Is there a difference between simultaneous or staged decompressions for combined cervical and lumbar stenosis?. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24 (06) 409-413
  • 12 Naderi S, Mertol T. Simultaneous cervical and lumbar surgery for combined symptomatic cervical and lumbar spinal stenoses. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002; 15 (03) 229-231 discussion 231–232
  • 13 Krishnan A, Dave BR, Kambar AK, Ram H. Coexisting lumbar and cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): an infrequent presentation. Retrospective analysis of single-stage surgery (53 cases) Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (01) 64-73
  • 14 Yehya A. The clinical outcome of lateral mass fixation after decompressive laminectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Alexandria J Med 2015; 51 (02) 153-159