PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2019; 28(01): 071-077
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677907
Section 2: Human Factors and Organizational Issues
Survey
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Human Factors and Usability for Health Information Technology: Old and New Challenges

Pascale Carayon
1   Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
,
Peter Hoonakker∗
1   Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
16. August 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objectives: Despite national mandates, incentives, and other programs, the design of health information technology (IT) remains problematic and usability problems continue to be reported. This paper reviews recent literature on human factors and usability of health IT, with a specific focus on research aimed at applying human factors methods and principles to improve the actual design of health IT, its use, and associated patient and clinician outcomes.

Methods: We reviewed recent literature on human factors and usability problems of health IT and research on human-centered design of health IT for clinicians and patients.

Results: Studies continue to show usability problems of health IT experienced by multiple groups of health care professionals (e.g., physicians and nurses) as well as patients. Recent research shows that usability is influenced by both designers (e.g., IT vendors) and implementers in health care organizations, and that the application of human-centered design practices needs to be further improved and extended. We welcome emerging research on the design of health IT for teams as team-based care is increasingly implemented throughout health care.

Conclusions: Progress in the application of human factors methods and principles to the design of health IT is occurring, with important information provided on their actual impact on care processes and patient outcomes. Future research should examine the work of health IT designers and implementers, which would help to develop strategies for further embedding human factors engineering in IT design processes.

Keywords

Human factors engineering - usability - human-centered design - health information technology - patient safety
 

  • References

  • 1 Gawande A. Why doctors hate their computers. The New Yorker; 2018
    PubMed
  • 2 Staggers N, Elias BL, Makar E, Alexander GL. The imperative of solving nurses’ usability problems with health information technology. J Nurs Adm 2018; 48 (04) 191-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Czaja SJ, Zarcadoolas C, Vaughon WL, Lee CC, Rockoff ML, Levy J. The usability of electronic personal health record systems for an underserved adult population. Hum Factors 2015; 57 (03) 491-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lin SC, Jha AK, Adler-Milstein J. Electronic health records associated with lower hospital mortality after systems have time to mature. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37 (07) 1128-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Agboola SO, Bates DW, Kvedar JC. Digital health and patient safety. JAMA 2016; 315 (16) 1697-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Turner P, Kushniruk A, Nohr C. Are we there yet? Human factors knowledge and health information technology - the challenges of implementation and impact. Yearb Med Inform 2017; 26 (01) 84-91
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kushniruk A, Nohr C, Borycki E. Human factors for more usable and safer health information technology: Where are we now and where do we go from here?. Yearb Med Inform 2016 (01) 120-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Patel VL, Kannampallil TG. Human factors and health information technology: Current challenges and future directions. Yearb Med Inform 2014; 9: 58-66
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schulte F, Fry E. Death by 1,000 clicks: Where electronic health records went wrong. Kaiser Health News; March 18, 2019
    PubMed
  • 10 Kutney-Lee A, Sloane DM, Bowles KH, Burns LR, Aiken L. Electronic health record adoption and nurse reports of usability and quality of care: The role of work environment. App Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 129-39
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, Hasan O, Satele D, Sloan J. , et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91 (07) 836-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Sittig DF. Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173 (08) 702-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ratwani RM, Savage E, Will A, Fong A, Karavite D, Muthu N. , et al. Identifying electronic health record usability and safety challenges in pediatric settings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37 (11) 1752-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Carayon P, Du S, Brown R, Cartmill R, Johnson M, Wetterneck TB. EHR-related medication errors in two ICUs. J Healthc Risk Manag 2017; 36 (03) 6-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Braithwaite J, Wears RL, Hollnagel E. Resilient health care: Turning patient safety on its head. Int J Qual Health Care 2015; 27 (05) 418-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hollnagel E. Human factors/ergonomics as a systems discipline? “The human use of human beings” revisited. Appl Ergon 2014
    PubMed
  • 17 Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, Temte JL, Tuan WJ, Sinsky CA. , et al. Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med 2017; 15 (05) 419-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gardner RL, Cooper E, Haskell J, Harris DA, Poplau S, Kroth PJ. , et al. Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology. J Am Med Inform Asoc 2019; 26 (02) 106-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ratwani RM, Reider J, Singh H. A decade of health information technology usability challenges and the path forward. JAMA 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ratwani RM, Hodgkins M, Bates DW. Improving electronic health record usability and safety requires transparency. JAMA 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McDonnell C, Werner K, Wendel K. Electronic Health Record Usability: Vendor Practices and Perspectives. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. Contract No.: AHRQ Publication No. 09(10)-0091-3-EF
    PubMed
  • 22 Ratwani RM, Fairbanks RJ, Hettinger AZ, Benda NC. Electronic health record usability: Analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (06) 1179-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ratwani RM, Savage E, Will A, Arnold R, Khairat S, Miller K. , et al. A usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: a multi-center study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (09) 1197-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Marcilly R, Ammenwerth E, Roehrer E, Pelayo S, Vasseur F, Beuscart-Zephir MC. Usability flaws in medication alerting systems: Impact on usage and work system. earb Med Inform 2015; 10 (01) 55-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Marcilly R, Ammenwerth E, Vasseur F, Roehrer E, Beuscart-Zephir MC. Usability flaws of medication-related alerting functions: A systematic qualitative review. J Biomed Inform 2015; 55: 260-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Watbled L, Marcilly R, Guerlinger S, Bastien JMC, Beuscart-Zephir M, Beuscart R. Combining usability evaluations to highlight the chain that leads from usability flaws to usage problems and then negative outcomes. J Biomed Inform 2018; 78: 12-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Scapin DL, Bastien JMC. Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behaviour & Information Technology 1997; 16 (04) 220-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wulff IA, Westgaard RH, Rasmussen B. Ergonomic criteria in large-scale engineering design - I - Management by documentation only? Formal organization vs. designers’ perceptions. Appl Ergon 1999; 30: 191-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wulff IA, Westgaard RH, Rasmussen B. Ergonomic criteria in large-scale engineering design - II - Evaluating and applying requirements in the real-world of design. Appl Ergon 1999; 30: 207-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Perrow C. Normal Accidents - Living with HighRisk Technologies. New York: Basic Books; 1984
    PubMed
  • 31 Perrow C. The organizational context of human factors engineering. Adm Sci Q 1983; 28 (04) 521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Beuscart-Zephir MC, Elkin P, Pelayo S, Beuscart R. The human factors engineering approach to biomedical informatics projects: State of the art, results, benefits and challenges. Yearb Med Inform 2007; 46 (Suppl 1): 109-27
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Beuscart-Zephir MC, Borycki E, Carayon P, Jaspers MWM, Pelayo S. Evolution of human factors research and studies of health information technologies: the role of patient safety. Yearb Med Inform 2013; 8 (01) 67-77
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Savoy A, Patel H, Flanagan ME, Daggy JK, Russ AL, Weiner M. Comparative usability evaluation of consultation order templates in a simulated primary care environment. Appl Ergon 2018; 73: 22-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Savoy A, Militello LG, Patel H, Flanagan ME, Russ AL, Daggy JK. , et al. A cognitive systems engineering design approach to improve the usability of electronic order forms for medical consultation. J Biomed Inform 2018; 85: 138-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Guarrera TK, McGeorge NM, Clark LN, LaVergne DT, Hettinger ZA, Fairbanks RJ. , et al. Cognitive engineering design of an emergency department information system. In: Bisantz AM, Burns CM, Fairbanks RJ. editors. Cognitive Systems Engineering in Health Care. CRC Press; 2014: 43-74
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Martinez W, Threatt AL, Rosenbloom ST, Wallston KA, Hickson GB, Elasy TA. A patient-facing diabetes dashboard embedded in a patient web portal: Design sprint and usability testing. JMIR Hum Factors 2018; 5 (03) e26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Srinivas P, Cornet V, Holden R. Human factors analysis, design, and evaluation of Engage, a consumer health IT application for geriatric heart failure self-care. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2017; 33 (04) 298-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sedlmayr B, Schoffler J, Prokosch HU, Sedlmayr M. User-centered design of a mobile medication management. Inform Health Soc Care 2018; 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Valdez RS, Holden RJ, Novak LL, Veinot TC. Transforming consumer health informatics through a patient work framework: Connecting patients to context. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (01) 2-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Griffioen I, Melles M, Stiggelbout A, Snelders D. The potential of service design for improving the implementation of shared decision-making. Design for Health 2017; 1 (02) 194-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Brunner J, Chuang E, Goldzweig C, Cain CL, Sugar C, Yano EM. User-centered design to improve clinical decision support in primary care. Int J Med Inf 2017; 104: 56-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Russ AL, Zillich AJ, Melton BL, Russell SA, Chen S, Spina JR. , et al. Applying human factors principles to alert design increases efficiency and reduces prescribing errors in a scenario-based simulation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (e2): e287-e96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rousek JB, Hallbeck MS. Improving medication management through the redesign of the hospital code cart medication drawer. Hum Factors 2011; 53 (06) 626-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Khunlertkit A, Dorissaint L, Chen A, Paine L, Pronovost PJ. Reducing and sustaining duplicate medical record creation by usability testing and system redesign. J Patient Saf. In press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Mitchell P, Wynia M, Golden R, McNellis B, Okun S, Webb EC. , et al. Core Principles & Values of Effective Team-Based Health Care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Walker J, Carayon P. From tasks to processes: The case for changing health information technology to improve health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28 (02) 467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Parush A. Displays for health care teams: A conceptual framework and design methodology. In: Bisantz AM, Burns CM, Fairbanks RJ. editors. Cognitive Systems Engineering in Health Care. CRC Press; 2014: 75-96
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Wooldridge AR, Carayon P, Hoonakker P, Hose BT, Ross J, Kohler JE. , et al. Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: Implications for multi-level awareness. Cogn Technol Work In press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Calder LA, Bhandari A, Mastoras G, Day K, Momtahan K, Falconer M. , et al. Healthcare providers’ perceptions of a situational awareness display for emergency department resuscitation: A simulation qualitative study. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 30 (01) 16-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Parush A, Kramer C, Foster-Hunt T, McMullan A, Momtahan K. Exploring similarities and differences in teamwork across diverse healthcare contexts using communication analysis. Cognition, Technology & Work 2014; 16 (01) 47-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Parush A, Mastoras G, Bhandari A, Momtahan K, Day K, Weitzman B. , et al. Can teamwork and situational awareness (SA) in ED resuscitations be improved with a technological cognitive aid? Design and a pilot study of a team situation display. J Biomed Inform 2017; 76: 154-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Wu P, Nam MY, Choi J, Kirlik A, Sha L, Berlin Jr RB. Supporting emergency medical care teams with an integrated status display providing real-time access to medical best practices, workflow tracking, and patient data. J Med Syst 2017; 41 (12) 186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Guise JM, Deering SH, Kanki BG, Osterweil P, Li H, Mori M. , et al. Validation of a tool to measure and promote clinical teamwork. Simul Healthc 2008; 3 (04) 217-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Beyer H, Holtzblatt K. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1997
    PubMed
  • 56 Carayon P, Wooldridge A. Improving patient safety in the patient journey: Contributions from human factors engineering. In: Smith AE. editor. Women in Industrial and Systems Engineering: Key Advances and Perspectives on Emerging Topics. Springer Nature; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Carayon P, Wood KE. Patient safety: The role of human factors and systems engineering. In: Rouse WB, Cortese DA. editors. Engineering the System of Healthcare Delivery. IOS Press; 2009: 23-46
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Hoonakker PLT, Wooldridge AR, Carayon P, Hose BZ, Eithun BL, Brazelton TB. et al., editors. Things Falling Through the Cracks: Information Loss During Pediatric Trauma Care Transitions. Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Florence, Italy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018
    PubMed
  • 59 Calvitti A, Hochheiser H, Ashfaq S, Bell K, Chen Y, El Kareh R. , et al. Physician activity during outpatient visits and subjective workload. J Biomed Inform 2017; 69: 135-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Détienne F. Collaborative design: Managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives. Interact Comput 2006; 18 (01) 1-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar