Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(03): 216-220
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670652
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Ahead of the Curve: Tracking Progress in Novice Microsurgeons

John P. Brosious
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
,
Shawna R. Kleban
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
,
Joshua J. Goldman
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
,
Adnan G. Mohsin
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
,
Shelly J. Williams
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
,
Wei Z. Wang
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
,
John M. Menezes
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
,
Richard C. Baynosa
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the Plastic Surgery Foundation Research Grant (grant number: 235106).
Further Information

Publication History

24 April 2018

02 August 2018

Publication Date:
21 September 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate learning curves for an existing microsurgical training model. We compared efficiency and amount of training needed to achieve proficiency between novice microsurgeons without operative experience versus those who had completed a surgical internship.

Methods Ten novice microsurgeons anastomosed a silastic tube model. Time to perform each anastomosis, luminal diameter, and number of errors were recorded.

Results First year residents improved up to a brief plateau at 10 repetitions, followed by continued improvement. Second year residents improved up to a plateau at 10 repetitions with no further improvement thereafter. There was no significant difference in luminal area or errors between groups.

Conclusion Residents with no operative experience can benefit from early exposure to microsurgical training. These interns continue to improve with additional repetitions while second year residents achieve proficiency with fewer repetitions.

Keywords

microsurgical skills - surgical simulation - microsurgical training

Note

The study was presented at the World Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery 2013 Congress, Chicago, Illinois.


 

  • References

  • 1 Korndorffer Jr JR, Scott DJ, Sierra R. , et al. Developing and testing competency levels for laparoscopic skills training. Arch Surg 2005; 140 (01) 80-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rosser Jr JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS. Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg 1998; 133 (06) 657-661
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Tsuda S, Scott D, Doyle J, Jones DB. Surgical skills training and simulation. Curr Probl Surg 2009; 46 (04) 271-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Buncke HJ. Microsurgical research--a personal experience. Microsurgery 1995; 16 (04) 186-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Goldwyn RM. Microsurgery and hand surgery: early days, late nights: some reminiscences. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (05) 475-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zhang F, Sones WD, Lineaweaver WC. Microsurgical flap models in the rat. J Reconstr Microsurg 2001; 17 (03) 211-221
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schonauer F, La Rusca I, Gonzales Y Reyero E, Romagnuolo M, Molea G. [Laboratory model of a microvascular free flap in the rat: the epigastric flap]. Minerva Chir 2002; 57 (04) 537-541
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Petry JJ. Microsurgical models. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84 (05) 856
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hui KCW, Zhang F, Shaw WW. , et al. Learning curve of microvascular venous anastomosis: a never ending struggle?. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (01) 22-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ad-El DD, Harper A, Hoffman LA. Digital replantation teaching model in rats. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (01) 42-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Matsumura N, Endo S, Hamada H, Kurimoto M, Hirashima Y, Takaku A. An experimental model for side-to-side microvascular anastomosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 1999; 15 (08) 581-583
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rosenbaum TJ, Sundt Jr TM. Neurovascular microsurgery: a model for laboratory investigation and the development of technical skills. Mayo Clin Proc 1976; 51 (05) 301-306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Usón J, Calles MC. Design of a new suture practice card for microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2002; 22 (08) 324-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lahiri A, Lim AYT, Qifen Z, Lim BH. Microsurgical skills training: a new concept for simulation of vessel-wall suturing. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (01) 21-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Peled IJ, Kaplan HY, Wexler MR. Microsilicone anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 1983; 10 (04) 331-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kaufman T, Hurwitz DJ, Ballantyne DL. The foliage leaf in microvascular surgery. Microsurgery 1984; 5 (01) 57-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lausada NR, Escudero E, Lamonega R, Dreizzen E, Raimondi JC. Use of cryopreserved rat arteries for microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (06) 500-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Govila A. A simple model on which to practise microsurgical technique: a fresh chicken. Br J Plast Surg 1981; 34 (04) 486-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Steffens K, Koob E, Hong G. Training in basic microsurgical techniques without experiments involving animals. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1992; 111 (04) 198-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Trignano E, Fallico N, Zingone G, Dessy LA, Campus GV. Microsurgical training with the three-step approach. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (02) 87-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chan WY, Matteucci P, Southern SJ. Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: a review. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (05) 494-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cifuentes IJ, Rodriguez JR, Yañez RA. , et al. A novel ex vivo training model for acquiring supermicrosurgical skills using a chicken leg. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (09) 699-705
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kim E, Singh M, Akelina Y, Shurey S, Myers SR, Ghanem AM. Effect of microvascular anastomosis technique on end product outcome in simulated training: a prospective blinded randomized controlled trial. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (07) 556-561
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brosious JP, Tsuda ST, Menezes JM. , et al. Objective evaluation of skill acquisition in novice microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (08) 539-542
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Willis RE, Richa J, Oppeltz R. , et al. Comparing three pedagogical approaches to psychomotor skills acquisition. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (01) 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Willis RE, Wiersch J, Adams AJ, Al Fayyadh MJ, Weber RA, Wang HT. Development and evaluation of a simulation model for microvascular anastomosis training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (07) 493-501
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B, Kim E, Myers S. Anastomosis lapse index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 233-241
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar