Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(05): 529-538
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670647
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Tongue-in-Groove Technique for Rhinoplasty: Technical Refinements and Considerations

Emily A. Spataro
1   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Sam P. Most
1   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 September 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

A key concept in successful rhinoplasty surgery is maintaining or increasing tip support, and addressing tip projection and rotation. The tongue-in-groove (TIG) technique is a method to achieve this goal using sutures to create a strong connection between the septum and medial crura to change tip rotation and projection. Criticisms of this method include that it may cause stiffness of the nasal tip and columellar retraction. TIG is routinely used by the authors during anterior septal reconstructions (a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique), as well as in primary and revision aesthetic and functional rhinoplasties. Through this review, technical aspects of the TIG technique are discussed, as well as how pitfalls of the technique can be avoided, as illustrated by several rhinoplasty patient examples.

Keywords

rhinoplasty - tongue-in-groove - nasal tip - tip projection - tip rotation
 

  • References

  • 1 Most SP, Rudy SF. Septoplasty: basic and advanced techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2017; 25 (02) 161-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Sazgar AA, Most SP. Stabilization of nasal tip support in nasal tip reduction surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 145 (06) 932-934
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Toriumi DM. New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 156-185
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Toriumi DM. Structure approach in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2002; 10 (01) 1-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Toriumi DM. Structural approach to primary rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22 (01) 72-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Rohrich RJ, Hoxworth RE, Kurkjian TJ. The role of the columellar strut in rhinoplasty: indications and rationale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 118e-125e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Rohrich RJ, Kurkjian TJ, Hoxworth RE, Stephan PJ, Mojallal A. The effect of the columellar strut graft on nasal tip position in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 926-932
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Surowitz JB, Most SP. Complications of rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2013; 21 (04) 639-651
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kridel RW, Scott BA, Foda HM. The tongue-in-groove technique in septorhinoplasty. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (04) 246-256 , discussion 257–258
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Datema FR, Lohuis PJ. Tongue-in-groove setback of the medial crura to control nasal tip deprojection in open rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015; 39 (01) 53-62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Karaiskakis P, Bromba M, Dietz A, Sand M, Dacho A. Reconstruction of nasal tip support in primary, open approach septorhinoplasty: a retrospective analysis between the tongue-in-groove technique and the columellar strut. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (09) 2555-2560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Shah A, Pfaff M, Kinsman G, Steinbacher DM. Alar-columellar and lateral nostril changes following tongue-in-groove rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015; 39 (02) 191-198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Gubisch W. Twenty-five years experience with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (04) 230-239
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Most SP. Anterior septal reconstruction: outcomes after a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 202-207
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Surowitz J, Lee MK, Most SP. Anterior septal reconstruction for treatment of severe caudal septal deviation: clinical severity and outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153 (01) 27-33
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Keeler JA, Moubayed SP, Most SP. Straightening the crooked middle vault with the clocking stitch: an anatomic study. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (03) 240-241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Caughlin BP, Been MJ, Rashan AR, Toriumi DM. The effect of polydioxanone absorbable plates in septorhinoplasty for stabilizing caudal septal extension grafts. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (02) 120-125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Murakami CS, Barrera JE, Most SP. Preserving structural integrity of the alar cartilage in aesthetic rhinoplasty using a cephalic turn-in flap. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (02) 126-128
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bitik O, Uzun H, Kamburoğlu HO, Çaliş M, Zins JE. Revisiting the role of columellar strut graft in primary open approach rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 987-997
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Mittermiller PA, Sheckter CC, Most SP. Efficacy and safety of titanium miniplates for patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (01) 82-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar