RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669446
Predictors of Hand Dexterity after Single-Digit Replantation
Publikationsverlauf
04. März 2018
25. Juli 2018
Publikationsdatum:
28. August 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jrm/201903/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0038-1669446_180091-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Microsurgical replantation of the thumb and digits has become an increasingly familiar technique in clinical practice worldwide. However, successful digit replantation does not always provide better hand function than revision amputation. Little information is available regarding predictors of motor skill activities of replanted hands. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated hand dexterity after single-digit replantation at a minimum follow-up of 1 year and analyzed the factors influencing dexterity.
Methods This retrospective cohort study included 23 patients treated for amputation injuries at our institution from 2014 to 2015. Patients with amputations from Tamai's zone 2 to 5 of the thumb (3 patients), index finger (11 patients), or middle finger (9 patients) who underwent digital replantation surgery and were followed up for more than 1 year were included. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at an average of 23 months postoperatively (range: 13–25 months). We hypothesized that possible factors influencing hand dexterity after single-digit replantation were patient age, injured finger, key pinch strength, Semmes–Weinstein test result, and percentage of total active motion. Relationships between the outcome variable, which was the result of the Purdue Pegboard Test of hand dexterity, and explanatory variables were analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. A p-value of < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results No postoperative complications occurred. Univariate analysis indicated that decreased hand dexterity after single-digit replantation was significantly associated with older age (p = 0.001) and poor recovery of sensation, as shown by the Semmes–Weinstein test (p = 0.012).
Conclusion Patient age was a risk factor for low hand dexterity after replantation surgery. Recovery of finger sensitivity enhanced dexterity of motor skill activities following finger replantation surgery.
-
References
- 1 Komatsu S, Tamai S. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42(4): 374-377
- 2 Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (03) 723-737
- 3 Urbaniak JR, Evans JP, Bright DS. Microvascular management of ring avulsion injuries. J Hand Surg Am 1981; 6 (01) 25-30
- 4 Urbaniak JR, Roth JH, Nunley JA, Goldner RD, Koman LA. The results of replantation after amputation of a single finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (04) 611-619
- 5 Schenker M, Burstedt MKO, Wiberg M, Johansson RS. Precision grip function after hand replantation and digital nerve injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (07) 706-716
- 6 Walaszek I, Zyluk A. Long term follow-up after finger replantation. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33 (01) 59-64
- 7 Woo SH, Kim YW, Cheon HJ. , et al. Management of complications relating to finger amputation and replantation. Hand Clin 2015; 31 (02) 319-338
- 8 Payne S, Macintosh A, Stock J. The influence of digit size and proportions on dexterity during cold exposure. Am J Phys Anthropol 2018; DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23486.
- 9 Fujioka M, Hayashida K. Proximal interphalangeal replantation with arthrodesis facilitates favorable esthetics and functional outcome. J Trauma Manag Outcomes 2015; 9: 7
- 10 Kaji D, Omokawa S, Nakanishi A, Kawamura K, Shimizu T. Patient satisfaction and hand performance following fingertip amputation: retrospective cohort study. J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2017; 2: e78-e82
- 11 Hayashi H, Nakashima D, Matsuoka H. , et al. Exploring the factor on sensory motor function of upper limb associated with executive function in community dwelling older adults. Nagoya J Med Sci 2016; 78 (03) 285-291
- 12 O'Brien B. Microsurgery in the treatment of injuries. In: Mckibbin B. , ed. Recent Advances in Orthopaedics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975: 235-279
- 13 Medling BD, Bueno Jr RA, Russell RC, Neumeister MW. Replantation outcomes. Clin Plast Surg 2007; 34 (02) 177-185 , vii–viii
- 14 Pederson WC. Replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (03) 823-841
- 15 Akyürek M, Safak T, Keçik A. Ring avulsion replantation by extended debridement of the avulsed digital artery and interposition with long venous grafts. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48 (06) 574-581
- 16 Sears ED, Chung KC. Replantation of finger avulsion injuries: a systematic review of survival and functional outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (04) 686-694
- 17 Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, Estrella EP. A retrospective study of functional outcomes after successful replantation versus amputation closure for single fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (05) 811-818
- 18 Ngaage LM, Oni G, Buntic R, Malata CM, Buncke G. Initial management of traumatic digit amputations: a retrospective study of functional outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 250-257