PDF herunterladen
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 04): S291-S299
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668158
WFSBS 2016
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Complications of Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Philippe Lavigne
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Daniel L. Faden
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Eric W. Wang
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Carl H. Snyderman
1   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

30. April 2018

07. Juli 2018

Publikationsdatum:
20. August 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is considered the primary vascularized flap for reconstruction of dural defects with endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base. However, the complications and morbidities associated with this reconstructive flap are poorly understood. This article presents a systematic review of the complications and morbidities related to the use of the NSF in skull base surgery.

Method A systematic review of the literature based on published guidelines was performed to identify potential complications and morbidities related to the NSF. The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 1950 to February 5, 2018.

Results Twenty-seven articles were identified. Reported complications were as follows: NSF necrosis (4 studies; [0–1.3%]), mucocele formation (5 studies; [0–3.6%]), septal perforation (6 studies, [0–14.4%]), nasal dorsum collapse (2 studies, [0.7–5.8%]), effects on quality of life (QoL) (8 studies), and olfactory loss (11 studies).

Conclusion Although complications associated with the NSF may be underreported in the literature, the NSF appears to be a safe and reliable reconstructive flap in EES of the skull base.

Keywords

systematic review - skull base surgery - nasoseptal flap - complications - reconstruction
 

  • References

  • 1 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hirsch O. Successful closure of cere brospinal fluid rhinorrhea by endonasal surgery. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1952; 56 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (02) 452-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. , et al. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009; 23 (05) 518-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chabot JD, Patel CR, Hughes MA. , et al. Nasoseptal flap necrosis: a rare complication of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 2018; 128 (05) 1463-1472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Soyka MB, Serra C, Regli L, Meier E, Holzmann D. Long-term olfactory outcome after nasoseptal flap reconstructions in midline skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2017; 31 (05) 334-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Soudry E, Psaltis AJ, Lee KH, Vaezafshar R, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Complications associated with the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (01) 80-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Thorp BD, Sreenath SB, Ebert CS, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (04) E4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dolci RLL, Miyake MM, Tateno DA. , et al. Postoperative otorhinolaryngologic complications in transnasal endoscopic surgery to access the skull base. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2017; 83 (03) 349-355
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Husain Q, Sanghvi S, Kovalerchik O. , et al. Assessment of mucocele formation after endoscopic nasoseptal flap reconstruction of skull base defects. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 2013; 4 (01) e27-e31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bleier BS, Wang EW, Vandergrift III WA, Schlosser RJ. Mucocele rate after endoscopic skull base reconstruction using vascularized pedicled flaps. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011; 25 (03) 186-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nyquist GG, Anand VK, Singh A, Schwartz TH. Janus flap: bilateral nasoseptal flaps for anterior skull base reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 142 (03) 327-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rowan NR, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH. Nasal deformities following nasoseptal flap reconstruction of skull base defects. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77 (01) 14-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shin JH, Kang SG, Kim SW. , et al. Bilateral nasoseptal flaps for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (05) 1569-1572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jalessi M, Jahanbakhshi A, Amini E, Kamrava SK, Farhadi M. Impact of nasoseptal flap elevation on sinonasal quality of life in endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary adenomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (05) 1199-1205
    Google Scholar
  • 16 de Almeida JR, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Carrau RL, Vescan AD. Nasal morbidity following endoscopic skull base surgery: a prospective cohort study. Head Neck 2011; 33 (04) 547-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pant H, Bhatki AM, Snyderman CH. , et al. Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20 (01) 35-40
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Upadhyay S, Buohliqah L, Dolci RLL, Otto BA, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. Periodic olfactory assessment in patients undergoing skull base surgery with preservation of the olfactory strip. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (09) 1970-1975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rioja E, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Enriquez K. , et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (07) 1809-1817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Harvey RJ, Winder M, Davidson A. , et al. The olfactory strip and its preservation in endoscopic pituitary surgery maintains smell and sinonasal function. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (06) 464-470
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chaaban MR, Chaudhry AL, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Objective assessment of olfaction after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29 (05) 365-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kim BY, Kang SG, Kim SW. , et al. Olfactory changes after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for skull base tumors. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (11) 2470-2475
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Tam S, Duggal N, Rotenberg BW. Olfactory outcomes following endoscopic pituitary surgery with or without septal flap reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013; 3 (01) 62-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kim SW, Park KB, Khalmuratova R, Lee HK, Jeon SY, Kim DW. Clinical and histologic studies of olfactory outcomes after nasoseptal flap harvesting. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (07) 1602-1606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rotenberg BW, Saunders S, Duggal N. Olfactory outcomes after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (08) 1611-1613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Harvey RJ, Malek J, Winder M. , et al. Sinonasal morbidity following tumour resection with and without nasoseptal flap reconstruction. Rhinology 2015; 53 (02) 122-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hanson M, Patel PM, Betz C, Olson S, Panizza B, Wallwork B. Sinonasal outcomes following endoscopic anterior skull base surgery with nasoseptal flap reconstruction: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (Suppl. 03) S41-S46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Thompson CF, Suh JD, Liu Y, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Modifications to the endoscopic approach for anterior skull base lesions improve postoperative sinonasal symptoms. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (01) 65-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 McCoul ED, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Improvements in site-specific quality of life 6 months after endoscopic anterior skull base surgery: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (03) 498-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Balaker AE, Bergsneider M, Martin NA, Wang MB. Evolution of sinonasal symptoms following endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20 (04) 245-251
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE. , et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336 (7650): 924-926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S. , et al; GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches the GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 2004; 4 (01) 38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zhang X, Wang EW, Wei H. , et al. Anatomy of the posterior septal artery with surgical implications on the vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap. Head Neck 2015; 37 (10) 1470-1476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kerr EE, Jamshidi A, Carrau RL. , et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence to evaluate nasoseptal flap viability in endoscopic endonasal cranial base surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (05) 408-412
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Learned KO, Adappa ND, Loevner LA, Palmer JN, Newman JG, Lee JY. MR imaging evaluation of endoscopic cranial base reconstruction with pedicled nasoseptal flap following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (03) 544-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Walsh E, Illing E, Riley KO. , et al. Inaccurate assessments of anterior cranial base malignancy following nasoseptal flap reconstruction. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (05) 385-389
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Park W, Hong SD, Nam DH. , et al. Nasoseptal flap elevation in patients with history of septal surgery: does it increase flap failure or cerebrospinal fluid leakage?. World Neurosurg 2016; 93: 164-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. , et al. Nasoseptal flap takedown and reuse in revision endoscopic skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (01) 42-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Alobid I, Enseñat J, Mariño-Sánchez F. , et al. Impairment of olfaction and mucociliary clearance after expanded endonasal approach using vascularized septal flap reconstruction for skull base tumors. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (04) 540-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Yoo F, Kuan EC, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Free mucosal graft reconstruction of the septum after nasoseptal flap harvest: a novel technique using a posterior septal free mucosal graft. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (02) 201-206
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kimple AJ, Leight WD, Wheless SA, Zanation AM. Reducing nasal morbidity after skull base reconstruction with the nasoseptal flap: free middle turbinate mucosal grafts. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (09) 1920-1924
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Caicedo-Granados E, Carrau R, Snyderman CH. , et al. Reverse rotation flap for reconstruction of donor site after vascular pedicled nasoseptal flap in skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (08) 1550-1552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zeinalizadeh M, Sadrehosseini SM, Barkhoudarian G, Carrau RL. Reconstruction of the denuded nasoseptal flap donor site with a free fascia lata graft: technical note. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (10) 3179-3182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar