Int J Angiol 2019; 28(04): 270-271
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667142
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

“Contrecoup” Paravalvular Leak Closure

Brian B. Agbor-Etang
1   Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, California
2   Division of Cardiology, St. Bernardine Medical Center, San Bernardino, California
,
Ravi M. Rao
1   Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, California
2   Division of Cardiology, St. Bernardine Medical Center, San Bernardino, California
,
Ashis Mukherjee
1   Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, California
2   Division of Cardiology, St. Bernardine Medical Center, San Bernardino, California
,
Prabhdeep S. Sethi
1   Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, California
2   Division of Cardiology, St. Bernardine Medical Center, San Bernardino, California
,
Ramdas G. Pai
1   Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, California
2   Division of Cardiology, St. Bernardine Medical Center, San Bernardino, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 July 2018 (online)

Abstract

Paravalvular aortic regurgitation affects some patients after surgically implanted prosthesis. The number of patients affected is likely to increase with increased utilization of nonsurgical valve replacement techniques. These patients are at increased risk of persistent clinical symptoms often requiring repair. Clinical and procedural outcomes are of importance when performing these procedures and managing these patients. We describe a case where two different leaks around an aortic prosthesis improved with closure of one defect.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rihal CS, Sorajja P, Booker JD, Hagler DJ, Cabalka AK. Principles of percutaneous paravalvular leak closure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5 (02) 121-130
  • 2 Bloch G, Vouhe PR, Menu P. , et al. Long-term evaluation of bioprosthetic valves: 615 consecutive cases. Eur Heart J 1984; 5 (Suppl D): 73-80
  • 3 Jindani A, Neville EM, Venn G, Williams BT. Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1991; 32 (04) 503-508
  • 4 Miller DL, Morris JJ, Schaff HV, Mullany CJ, Nishimura RA, Orszulak TA. Reoperation for aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: identification of patients at risk and results of operation. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4 (02) 160-165