J Knee Surg 2019; 32(07): 624-629
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666865
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Role of Surgical Closure Position in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Flexion versus Extension—A Randomized Prospective Study

Murad Pepe
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
,
Emre Calisal
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
,
Onur Kocadal
2   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Eren Bicer
3   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Suhan Taskin
4   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Cem Nuri Aktekin
3   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

12 September 2017

26 May 2018

Publication Date:
10 July 2018 (online)

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the effect of the knee position during the surgical closure on isokinetic muscle strength, clinical score, and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. Seventy-five eligible patients were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups; wound closure was performed with the knee flexed at 90° in group 1 and knee extended in group 2. All the surgeries were performed by the same surgeon and by the same prosthesis type. All the patients received the same rehabilitation program postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the knee flexion degrees and the American Knee Society Score values at preoperative and postoperative 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months. The secondary outcome was the isokinetic muscle strength measurements of both knees before the surgery and after 6 months. There were no significant differences in the American Knee Society Scores and knee flexion degrees between the flexion and extension groups. However, a significant decrease was found in the extensor muscle strength in the extension group after 6 months of the surgery. The findings of our study are that the closing of the knee in flexion or extension does not affect the postoperative knee flexion degrees and scores in total knee arthroplasty. However, quadriceps strength recovers early if the knee closure is performed in flexion position.

 
  • References

  • 1 Smith TO, Davies L, Hing CB. Wound closure in flexion versus extension following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Acta Orthop Belg 2010; 76 (03) 298-306
  • 2 Faldini C, Traina F, De Fine M, Pedrini M, Sambri A. Post-operative limb position can influence blood loss and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 852-859
  • 3 Bade MJ, Kittelson JM, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Predicting functional performance and range of motion outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 93 (07) 579-585
  • 4 Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA. Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75 (06) 950-955
  • 5 Parsley BS, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (275) 204-210
  • 6 Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 53-60
  • 7 Cerciello S, Morris BJ, Lustig S. , et al. The role of wound closure in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review on knee position. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (10) 3306-3312
  • 8 Hoogeboom TJ, van Meeteren NL, Schank K, Kim RH, Miner T, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Risk factors for delayed inpatient functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 167643
  • 9 Shoji H, Solomonow M, Yoshino S, D'Ambrosia R, Dabezies E. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1990; 13 (06) 643-649
  • 10 Emerson Jr RH, Ayers C, Head WC, Higgins LL. Surgical closing in primary total knee arthroplasties: flexion versus extension. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (331) 74-80
  • 11 Emerson Jr RH, Ayers C, Higgins LL. Surgical closing in total knee arthroplasty. A series follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (368) 176-181
  • 12 King TV, Kish G, Eberhart RE, Holzaepfel JL. The “genuflex” skin closure for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1992; 15 (09) 1057-1058
  • 13 Kömürcü E, Yüksel HY, Ersöz M. , et al. Effect of surgical closing in total knee arthroplasty at flexion or extension: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (12) 3067-3073
  • 14 Masri BA, Laskin RS, Windsor RE, Haas SB. Knee closure in total knee replacement: a randomized prospective trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (331) 81-86
  • 15 Motififard M, Heidari M, Nemati A. No difference between wound closure in extension or flexion for range of motion following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (01) 74-78
  • 16 Wang S, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu J, Huang G. Effect of the knee position during wound closure after total knee arthroplasty on early knee function recovery. J Orthop Surg 2014; 9 (01) 79
  • 17 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16 (04) 485-493
  • 18 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 248 (248) 13-14
  • 19 Nordez A, Casari P, Cornu C. Accuracy of Biodex system 3 pro computerized dynamometer in passive mode. Med Eng Phys 2008; 30 (07) 880-887
  • 20 Suresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: an unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011; 4 (01) 8-11
  • 21 Farquhar S, Snyder-Mackler L. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: the nonoperated knee predicts function 3 years after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (01) 37-44
  • 22 Moon Y-W, Kim H-J, Ahn H-S, Lee D-H. Serial changes of quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11 (02) e0148193
  • 23 Mau-Moeller A, Behrens M, Finze S, Bruhn S, Bader R, Mittelmeier W. The effect of continuous passive motion and sling exercise training on clinical and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized active-controlled clinical study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014; 12 (01) 68
  • 24 Romness DW, Rand JA. The role of continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (226) 34-37
  • 25 Coutts RD. A conversation with Richard D. Coutts, MD. Continuous passive motion in the rehabilitation of the total knee patient, its role and effect. Orthop Rev 1986; 15 (03) 126-134
  • 26 Bennett LA, Brearley SC, Hart JA, Bailey MJ. A comparison of 2 continuous passive motion protocols after total knee arthroplasty: a controlled and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (02) 225-233
  • 27 Harvey LA, Brosseau L, Herbert RD. Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 6 (02) CD004260
  • 28 Denis M, Moffet H, Caron F, Ouellet D, Paquet J, Nolet L. Effectiveness of continuous passive motion and conventional physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2006; 86 (02) 174-185
  • 29 Alaca N, Atalay A, Güven Z. Comparison of the long-term effectiveness of progressive neuromuscular facilitation and continuous passive motion therapies after total knee arthroplasty. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27 (11) 3377-3380
  • 30 Zhang XN, Wu G, Xu RZ, Bai XZ. Closed suction drainage or non-drainage for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012; 50 (12) 1119-1125
  • 31 Watanabe T, Muneta T, Yagishita K, Hara K, Koga H, Sekiya I. Closed suction drainage is not necessary for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study on simultaneous bilateral surgeries of a mean follow-up of 5.5 years. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (03) 641-645
  • 32 Omonbude D, El Masry MA, O'Connor PJ, Grainger AJ, Allgar VL, Calder SJ. Measurement of joint effusion and haematoma formation by ultrasound in assessing the effectiveness of drains after total knee replacement: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (01) 51-55
  • 33 Markar SR, Jones GG, Karthikesalingam A, Segaren N, Patel RV. Transfusion drains versus suction drains in total knee replacement: meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (09) 1766-1772
  • 34 Erne F, Wetzel S, Wülker N, Gesicki M, Hofmann UK. Closed suction drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial. J Knee Surg 2018; DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615297.
  • 35 Willemen D, Paul J, White SH, Crook DW. Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplasty. Effectiveness and risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (264) 232-234
  • 36 Quinn M, Bowe A, Galvin R, Dawson P, O'Byrne J. The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (04) 653-658