PDF herunterladen
Digestive Disease Interventions 2018; 02(02): 087-094
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1657793
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Liver Biopsy

Mohamed Attaya
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Ashraf Thabet
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

11. Februar 2018

20. April 2018

Publikationsdatum:
18. Juni 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Liver biopsies are among the most common procedures performed by the interventional radiologist. Liver biopsies may be performed through the percutaneous or transjugular approaches. Ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used for imaging guidance. Transjugular liver biopsies are generally reserved for specific circumstances in which the percutaneous method is associated with increased risk to the patient, such as coagulopathy, or when portal pressure measurements are desired. In addition, endobiliary biopsy through percutaneous transhepatic tracts may be an important means of assessing biliary strictures when the endoscopic route is impossible. This article serves as a general review of the multiple diagnostic hepatic interventions that may be performed by the interventional radiologist.

Keywords

percutaneous liver biopsy - transjugular - biliary
 

  • References

  • 1 Hahn PF, Gervais DA, O'Neill MJ, Mueller PR. Nonvascular interventional procedures: analysis of a 10-year database containing more than 21,000 cases. Radiology 2001; 220 (03) 730-736
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Flemming JA, Hurlbut DJ, Mussari B, Hookey LC. Liver biopsies for chronic hepatitis C: should nonultrasound-guided biopsies be abandoned?. Can J Gastroenterol 2009; 23 (06) 425-430
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lindor KD, Bru C, Jorgensen RA. , et al. The role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology 1996; 23 (05) 1079-1083
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Farrell RJ, Smiddy PF, Pilkington RM. , et al. Guided versus blind liver biopsy for chronic hepatitis C: clinical benefits and costs. J Hepatol 1999; 30 (04) 580-587
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Pasha T, Gabriel S, Therneau T, Dickson ER, Lindor KD. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Hepatology 1998; 27 (05) 1220-1226
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kaye R, Sane SS, Towbin RB. Pediatric intervention: an update--part II. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11 (07) 807-822
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S. , et al. Transjugular liver biopsy--indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications--a systematic review. J Hepatol 2007; 47 (02) 284-294
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Mammen T, Keshava SN, Eapen CE. , et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: a retrospective analysis of 601 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (03) 351-358
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Withers CE, Casola G, Herba MJ, Viloria J. Intravascular tumors: transvenous biopsy. Radiology 1988; 167 (03) 713-715
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tinsley B, Abbara A, Kadaba R, Sheth H, Sandhu G. Spontaneous intraperitoneal rupture of a hepatic hydatid cyst with subsequent anaphylaxis: a case report. Case Reports Hepatol 2013; 2013: 320418
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Li Y, Zheng H, Cao X, Liu Z, Chen L. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with anaphylactic shock after surgery for cystic echinococcosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011; 85 (03) 452-455
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Jedidi M, Mlayeh S, Masmoudi T, Souguir MK, Zemni M. Sudden death due to hydatid cyst: thirty-four medicolegal autopsy cases. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2014; 35 (01) 29-33
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Nunnari G, Pinzone MR, Gruttadauria S. , et al. Hepatic echinococcosis: clinical and therapeutic aspects. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18 (13) 1448-1458
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Little AF, Ferris JV, Dodd III GD, Baron RL. Image-guided percutaneous hepatic biopsy: effect of ascites on the complication rate. Radiology 1996; 199 (01) 79-83
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Murphy FB, Barefield KP, Steinberg HV, Bernardino ME. CT- or sonography-guided biopsy of the liver in the presence of ascites: frequency of complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151 (03) 485-486
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Tan KT, Rajan DK, Kachura JR, Hayeems E, Simons ME, Ho CS. Pain after percutaneous liver biopsy for diffuse hepatic disease: a randomized trial comparing subcostal and intercostal approaches. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (09) 1215-1219
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Radiology 1991; 178 (01) 253-258
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gupta S. New techniques in image-guided percutaneous biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004; 27 (02) 91-104
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 1990; 99 (05) 1396-1400
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Stevens LA, Shirk SJ. Automated biopsy devices: a blinded evaluation. Radiology 1993; 187 (03) 653-660
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Shirk SJ, Stevens LA. Blinded comparison of biopsy needles and automated devices in vitro: 1. Biopsy of diffuse hepatic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161 (06) 1293-1297
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Hatfield MK, Beres RA, Sane SS, Zaleski GX. Percutaneous imaging-guided solid organ core needle biopsy: coaxial versus noncoaxial method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190 (02) 413-417
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, McAdams HP, Yoshizumi TT. CT fluoroscopy--guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology 2001; 220 (01) 161-167
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 1999; 212 (03) 673-681
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lassen ED, Buck WB. Experimental lead toxicosis in swine. Am J Vet Res 1979; 40 (10) 1359-1364
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA. , et al. MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol 2008; 18 (12) 2865-2873
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (07) 495-500
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Riley III TR. How often does ultrasound marking change the liver biopsy site?. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94 (11) 3320-3322
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F. ; For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF). Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. Hepatology 2000; 32 (03) 477-481
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Pietrobattista A, Fruwirth R, Natali G, Monti L, Devito R, Nobili V. Is juvenile liver biopsy unsafe? Putting an end to a common misapprehension. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (09) 959-961
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Brown DB, Gonsalves CF. Percutaneous biopsy before interventional oncologic therapy: current status. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (07) 973-979
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Myers RP, Fong A, Shaheen AA. Utilization rates, complications and costs of percutaneous liver biopsy: a population-based study including 4275 biopsies. Liver Int 2008; 28 (05) 705-712
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kis B, Pamarthi V, Fan CM, Rabkin D, Baum RA. Safety and utility of transjugular liver biopsy in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (01) 85-89
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Lebrec D, Goldfarb G, Degott C, Rueff B, Benhamou JP. Transvenous liver biopsy: an experience based on 1000 hepatic tissue samplings with this procedure. Gastroenterology 1982; 83 (02) 338-340
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Cholongitas E, Burroughs AK. Liver: transjugular liver biopsy yields high-quality samples. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 9 (09) 491-492
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Procopet B, Bureau C, Métivier S. , et al. Tolerance of liver biopsy in a tertiary care center: comparison of the percutaneous and the transvenous route in 143 prospectively followed patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24 (10) 1209-1213
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Soyer P, Fargeaudou Y, Boudiaf M, Rymer R. Transjugular liver biopsy using ultrasonographic guidance for jugular vein puncture and an automated device for hepatic tissue sampling: a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive cases. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33 (06) 627-632
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Savader SJ, Prescott CA, Lund GB, Osterman FA. Intraductal biliary biopsy: comparison of three techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996; 7 (05) 743-750
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Savader SJ, Lynch FC, Radvany MG. , et al. Single-specimen bile cytology: a prospective study of 80 patients with obstructive jaundice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9 (05) 817-821
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Harell GS, Anderson MF, Berry PF. Cytologic bile examination in the diagnosis of biliary duct neoplastic strictures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137 (06) 1123-1126
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Muro A, Mueller PR, Ferrucci Jr JT, Taft PD. Bile cytology. A routine addition to percutaneous biliary drainage. Radiology 1983; 149 (03) 846-847
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Jung GS, Huh JD, Lee SU, Han BH, Chang HK, Cho YD. Bile duct: analysis of percutaneous transluminal forceps biopsy in 130 patients suspected of having malignant biliary obstruction. Radiology 2002; 224 (03) 725-730
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Rossi M, Cantisani V, Salvatori FM. , et al. Histologic assessment of biliary obstruction with different percutaneous endoluminal techniques. BMC Med Imaging 2004; 4 (01) 3
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Tapping CR, Byass OR, Cast JE. Cytological sampling versus forceps biopsy during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and analysis of factors predicting success. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35 (04) 883-889
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar