Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(03): 287-289
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655734
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Revision Rhinoplasty Consult: The Art of Managing Expectations.

Benjamin C. Marcus
1   Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 June 2018 (online)

Abstract

Rhinoplasty is widely acknowledged to be a challenging operation. The success of the operation has long been measured in anecdotal ways. As the surgeon—do I think the outcome is good? Does the patient tell me they are happy? At hand is an obvious issue with patients sometimes not returning to their original doctor. Other times they may have minor concerns that take minimal effort to correct. Does that constitute a revision? In most circles, the ultimate definition of revision rhinoplasty is a return to surgery with the intent to correct a functional or aesthetic concern that arose after the original procedure.

 
  • References

  • 1 Spataro E, Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Branham GH, Desai SC. Revision rates and risk factors of 175 842 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 212-219
  • 2 Ors S, Ozkose M, Ors S. Comparison of various rhinoplasty techniques and long-term results. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015; 39 (04) 465-473
  • 3 Constantinides M. The rhinoplasty consultation and the business of rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (01) 1-5 , v
  • 4 Singh P, Pearlman S. Use of computer imaging in rhinoplasty: a survey of the practices of facial plastic surgeons. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (04) 898-904
  • 5 Veale D, Gledhill LJ, Christodoulou P, Hodsoll J. Body dysmorphic disorder in different settings: A systematic review and estimated weighted prevalence. Body Image 2016; 18: 168-186