Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 1992; 67(06): 603-606
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1648508
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Value of Liquid Crystal Contact Thermography and Plasma Level of D-Dimer for Screening of Deep Venous Thrombosis Following General Abdominal Surgery

H Bounameaux
1   The Units of Angiology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
E Khabiri
1   The Units of Angiology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
O Huber
3   Clinic of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
P-A Schneider
4   Division of Radiodiagnostics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
D Didier
4   Division of Radiodiagnostics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
P de Moerloose
2   Hemostasis, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
G Reber
2   Hemostasis, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 25 October 1991

Accepted after revision 20 December 1991

Publication Date:
03 July 2018 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Because the use of radioactive fibrinogen uptake test (FUT) has become questionable both for ethical (risk of virus transmission) and technical (lack of sensitivity) reasons, we investigated the potential value of two alternative methods for screening of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis following elective digestive surgery: liquid crystal contact thermography (LCCT) and measurement of plasma concentration of D-dimer (DD), as compared with bilateral ascending phlebography. Out of 194 patients, 185 underwent phlebography on the 8th (0-19, median and range) postoperative day. Despite prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin and elastic stockings, DVT was detected on phlebography in 58 legs of 45 patients. Sensitivity of LCCT with respect to the presence of DVT was 55% (n = 184 patients) or 28% (n = 368 legs) with a specificity of 67% and 82%, respectively. These poor performances were obtained despite a good interobserver agreement for the LCCT assessments (overall kappa coefficient of 0.66 between three experts). The most accurate cut-off of DD for discriminating patients with or without DVT was 3,000 pg/1, as determined by ROC curve analysis. Sensitivity of a DD level of more than 3,000 pg/1 for the presence of phlebographically documented DVT on the 8th postoperative day was 89% for a specificity of 48%.

Thus, LCCT cannot be used for screening of postoperative, mainly asymptomatic DVT following general surgery. On the other hand, measurement of plasma DD may be useful for initial screening, a negative result (level less than 3,000 pg/1) allowing to exclude DVT (negative predictive value of 93%) and a positive result (positive predictive value of 35%) requiring confirmation by phlebography. This sequential approach might be useful in studies of the efficacy of antithrombotic regimens for prophylaxis of DVT in patients at risk.

 

  • References

  • 1 Biiller HR, Lensing AWA, Hirsh J, ten Cate JW. Deep vein thrombosis: new non-invasive diagnostic tests. Thromb Haemostas 1991; 66: 133-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kakkar W. Fibrinogen uptake test for detection of deep vein thrombosis. A review of current practice. Semin Nucl Med 1977; 7: 229-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fauno P, Suomalainen O, Bergqvist D, Fredin H, Kettunen K, Soimakallio S, Cederholm C, Karjalainen P, Vissinger H, Justesen T. The use of fibrinogen uptake test in screening for deep vein thrombosis in patients with hip fracture. Thromb Res 1990; 60: 185-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cruickshank MK, Levine MN, Hirsh J, Turpie AGG, Powers P, Jay R, Gent M. An evaluation of impedance plethysmography and 125I-Fibrinogen leg scanning in patients following hip surgery. Thromb Haemostas 1989; 62: 830-834
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pochaczevsky R, Pillari G, Feldman F. Liquid crystal contact thermography of deep venous thrombosis. AJR 1982; 138: 717-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nieuwenhuizen W. Plasma assays for derivatives of fibrin and of fibrinogen, based on monoclonal antibodies. Fibrinolysis 1988; 2: 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jensen C, Lomholdt Knudsen L, Hegedtis V. The role of contact thermography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Eur J Radiol 1983; 3: 99-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sandler DA, Martin JF. Liquid crystal contact thermography as a screening test for deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1985; i: 665-668
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hoffmann R, Briitsch HP, Largiader F, Tittel R. Die “Liquid-Crystal-Contact Thermography” (LCCT) - Ein neues diagnostisches Ver-fahren zur Bestimmung der Hautdurchblutung. Erfahrungen nach 300 Untersuchungen. Helv Chir Acta 1989; 56: 263-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Heaton DC, Billings JD, Hickton CM. Assessment of D dimer assays for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Lab Clin Med 1987; 110: 588-591
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rowbotham BJ, Carroll P, Whitaker AN, Bunce IH, Cobcroft RG, Elms MJ, Masci PP, Bundesen PG, Rylatt DB, Webber AJ. Measurement of crosslinked fibrin derivatives - Use in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemostas 1987; 57: 59-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ott P, Astrup L, Hartving Jensen R, Nyeland B, Pedersen B. Assessment of D-dimer in plasma: diagnostic value in suspected deep venous thrombosis of the leg. Acta Med Scand 1988; 224: 263-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bounameaux H, Schneider PA, Reber G, de Moerloose P, Krahen-buhl B. Measurement of plasma D-dimer for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 91: 82-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bounameaux H, Huber O, Khabiri E, Schneider PA, Didier D, Rohner A. Unexpectedly high rate of phlebographic deep venous thrombosis following elective general abdominal surgery among patients prophylaxed with low-molecular-weight heparin. Arch Surg. (in press)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed.. John Wiley & Sons Inc.; New York: 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under the receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psych Means 1960; 20: 37-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bounameaux H, Cirafici P, de Moerloose P, Schneider PA, Slosman D, Reber G, Unger PF. Measurement of D-dimer in plasma as diagnostic aid in suspected pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1991; 337: 196-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Goldhaber SZ, Vaughan DE, Tumeh SS, Loscalzo J. Utility of cross-linked fibrin degradation products in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am Heart J 1988; 116: 505-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Boneu B, Bes G, Pelzer H, Sie P, Boccalon H. D-dimers, thrombin-antithrombin III complexes and prothrombin fragments 1 + 2: diagnostic value in clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemostas 1991; 65: 28-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Elias A, Aillaud MF, Roul C, Villain Ph, Serradimigni A, Juhan-Vague I. Assessment of D-dimer measurement by ELISA or latex methods in deep vein thrombosis diagnosed by ultrasonic duplex scanning. Fibrinolysis 1990; 4: 237-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rowbotham BJ, Egerton-Vernon J, Whitaker AN, Elms MJ, Bunce IH. Plasma cross linked fibrin degradation products in pulmonary embolism. Thorax 1990; 45: 684-687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 van Bergen PFMM, Knot EAR, Jonker JJC, de Boer AC, de Maat MPM. Is quantitative determination of fibrin(ogen) degradation products and thrombin-antithrombin III complexes useful to diagnose deep venous thrombosis in outpatients?. Thromb Haemostas 1989; 62: 1043-1045
    PubMedGoogle Scholar