Appl Clin Inform 2018; 09(02): 275-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642609
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Nursing Information Flow in Long-Term Care Facilities

Quan Wei
1   Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
,
Karen L. Courtney
2   School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 November 2017

15 March 2018

Publication Date:
02 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective Long-term care (LTC), residential care requiring 24-hour nursing services, plays an important role in the health care service delivery system. The purpose of this study was to identify the needed clinical information and information flow to support LTC Registered Nurses (RNs) in care collaboration and clinical decision making.

Methods This descriptive qualitative study combines direct observations and semistructured interviews, conducted at Alberta's LTC facilities between May 2014 and August 2015. The constant comparative method (CCM) of joint coding was used for data analysis.

Results Nine RNs from six LTC facilities participated in the study. The RN practice environment includes two essential RN information management aspects: information resources and information spaces. Ten commonly used information resources by RNs included: (1) RN-personal notes; (2) facility-specific templates/forms; (3) nursing processes/tasks; (4) paper-based resident profile; (5) daily care plans; (6) RN-notebooks; (7) medication administration records (MARs); (8) reporting software application (RAI-MDS); (9) people (care providers); and (10) references (i.e., books). Nurses used a combination of shared information spaces, such as the Nurses Station or RN-notebook, and personal information spaces, such as personal notebooks or “sticky” notes. Four essential RN information management functions were identified: collection, classification, storage, and distribution. Six sets of information were necessary to perform RN care tasks and communication, including: (1) admission, discharge, and transfer (ADT); (2) assessment; (3) care plan; (4) intervention (with two subsets: medication and care procedure); (5) report; and (6) reference. Based on the RN information management system requirements, a graphic information flow model was constructed.

Conclusion This baseline study identified key components of a current LTC nursing information management system. The information flow model may assist health information technology (HIT) developers to consolidate the design of HIT solutions for LTC, and serve as a communication tool between nurses and information technology (IT) staff to refine requirements and support further LTC HIT research.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed and approved by University of Victoria Human Research Ethics Board (Protocol # 13–447) and Human Research Ethics Board of Alberta – Community Health Committee (Protocol # 14–0019). Organizational and administrative approvals were obtained from Alberta Health Services and Convenant Health.


 
  • References

  • 1 Government of B.C. Long-Term Residential Care; 2017. Available at: http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/health/accessing-health-care/home-community-care/care-options-and-cost/long-term-residential-care . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 2 Statistics Canada. Portrait of Families and Living Arrangements in Canada, Portrait of Families and Living Arrangements in Canada, families, households, marital status, 2011 census of population. Available at: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-312-x/98-312-x2011001-eng.pdf . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 3 AHS. Connect Care. 2018. Available from: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/info/cis.aspx . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 4 eHealth Ontario. What we do; 2018. Available at: http://www.ehealthontario.on.ca/en/about-us/about-us/ . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 5 Georgiou A, Marks A, Braithwaite J, Westbrook JI. Gaps, disconnections, and discontinuities--the role of information exchange in the delivery of quality long-term care. Gerontologist 2013; 53 (05) 770-779
  • 6 Or C, Dohan M, Tan J. Understanding critical barriers to implementing a clinical information system in a nursing home through the lens of a socio-technical perspective. J Med Syst 2014; 38 (09) 99
  • 7 Yu P, Zhang Y, Gong Y, Zhang J. Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (09) 772-788
  • 8 Alexander GL, Rantz M, Flesner M, Diekemper M, Siem C. Clinical information systems in nursing homes: an evaluation of initial implementation strategies. Comput Inform Nurs 2007; 25 (04) 189-197
  • 9 Bayley KB, Savitz LA, Rodriguez G, Gillanders W, Stoner S. Barriers associated with medication information handoffs. Advances in Patient Safety: from research to implementation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb (3). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20553/ . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 10 Tang C, Carpendale S. An observational study on information flow during nurses' shift change. ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2007 April 28--May 03 (1):219–228; San Jose, CA. Available at: http://innovis.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/innovis/uploads/Publications/Publications/paper823-tang.pdf . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 11 Tang C, Carpendale S. Supporting nurses' information flow by integrating paper and digital charting. ECSCW: Computer Supported Cooperative Work; 2009, September 07–11; Vienna, Austria:43–62. Available at: http://www.ecscw.uni-siegen.de/2009/6-Tang%20and%20Carpendale.pdf . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 12 Tariq A, Georgiou A, Westbrook J. Complexity of collaborative work in residential aged care facilities: an analysis of information exchange for medication management. HICSS; 2012; 45th, Jan 4–7. Hawaii:915–924. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6149006/?reload=trueat . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 13 Unertl KM, Weinger MB, Johnson KB, Lorenzi NM. Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (06) 826-836
  • 14 Unertl KM, Johnson KB, Gadd CS, Lorenzi NM. Bridging organizational divides in health care: an ecological view of health information exchange. JMIR Med Inform 2013; 1 (01) e3
  • 15 Cherry B, Carpenter K. Evaluating the effectiveness of electronic medical records in a long term care facility using process analysis. J Healthc Eng 2011; 2 (01) 75-86
  • 16 Kruse CS, Mileski M, Alaytsev V, Carol E, Williams A. Adoption factors associated with electronic health record among long-term care facilities: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2015; 5 (01) e006615
  • 17 Yeh SH, Jeng B, Lin LW. , et al. Implementation and evaluation of a nursing process support system for long-term care: a Taiwanese study. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18 (22) 3089-3097
  • 18 Brandeis G, Hogan M, Murphy M, Murray S. Electronic health record implementation in community nursing homes. JAMDA 2007; 8 (01) 31-34
  • 19 Tariq A, Lehnbom E, Oliver K. , et al. Design challenges for electronic medication administration record systems in residential aged care facilities: a formative evaluation. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (04) 971-987
  • 20 Vogelsmeier AA, Halbesleben JRB, Scott-Cawiezell JR. Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (01) 114-119
  • 21 Lindner SA, Davoren JB, Vollmer A, Williams B, Landefeld CS. An electronic medical record intervention increased nursing home advance directive orders and documentation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55 (07) 1001-1006
  • 22 Munyisia EN, Yu P, Hailey D. Does the introduction of an electronic nursing documentation system in a nursing home reduce time on documentation for the nursing staff?. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80 (11) 782-792
  • 23 Nahm ES, Mills ME, Feege B. Long-term care information systems: an overview of the selection process. J Gerontol Nurs 2006; 32 (06) 32-38
  • 24 Ranegger R, Hackl WO, Ammenwerth E. Implementation of the Austrian nursing minimum data set (NMDS-AT): a feasibility study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15 (01) 75
  • 25 Hustey FM, Palmer RM. Implementing an Internet-based communication network for use during skilled nursing facility to emergency department care transitions: challenges and opportunities for improvement. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012; 13 (03) 249-253
  • 26 Nelson R. Connecting the providers in your healthcare community: one step at a time. Front Health Serv Manage 2005; 22 (02) 13-28
  • 27 Alexander GL, Pasupathy KS, Steege LM, Strecker EB, Carley KM. Multi-disciplinary communication networks for skin risk assessment in nursing homes with high IT sophistication. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83 (08) 581-591
  • 28 Rantz MJ, Hicks L, Petroski GF. , et al. Cost, staffing and quality impact of bedside electronic medical record (EMR) in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010; 11 (07) 485-493
  • 29 Marquard JL, Mei YY. Using process visualizations to validate electronic form design. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2010:497–501. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041292/ . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 30 Pierson S, Hansen R, Greene S. , et al. Preventing medication errors in long-term care: results and evaluation of a large scale web-based error reporting system. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16 (04) 297-302
  • 31 Glaser BG, Stauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1967
  • 32 Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1985: 334-341
  • 33 Canadian Nurses Association. Framework for the practice of registered nurses in CANADA; 2015. Available at: https://www.cna-aiic.ca/∼/media/cna/page-content/pdf-en/framework-for-the-pracice-of-registered-nurses-in-canada.pdf?la=en . Accessed April 16, 2018
  • 34 Alexander GL, Madsen RW, Miller EL, Wakefield DS, Wise KK, Alexander RL. The state of nursing home information technology sophistication in rural and nonrural US markets. J Rural Health 2017; 33 (03) 266-274
  • 35 Alexander GL, Madsen RW, Miller EL. , et al. A national report of nursing home information technology: year 1 results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (01) 67-73
  • 36 Abramson EL, McGinnis S, Moore J, Kaushal R. ; HITEC investigators. A statewide assessment of electronic health record adoption and health information exchange among nursing homes. Health Serv Res 2014; 49 (1 Pt 2): 361-372
  • 37 Alexander GL, Popejoy L, Lyons V. , et al. Exploring health information exchange implementation using qualitative assessments of nursing home leaders. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2016; 13 (Fall): 1f
  • 38 Pillemer K, Meador RH, Teresi JA. , et al. Effects of electronic health information technology implementation on nursing home resident outcomes. J Aging Health 2012; 24 (01) 92-112
  • 39 Kruse CS, Mileski M, Vijaykumar AG, Viswanathan SV, Suskandla U, Chidambaram Y. Impact of electronic health records on long-term care facilities: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 2017; 5 (03) e35
  • 40 Alexander GL, Rantz M, Galambos C. , et al. Preparing nursing homes for the future of health information exchange. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (02) 248-266
  • 41 Alexander GL, Steege LM, Pasupathy KS, Wise KK. Case studies of IT sophistication in nursing homes: a mixed method approach to examine communication strategies about pressure ulcer prevention practices. Int J Ind Ergon 2015; (49) 156-166
  • 42 Alexander GL, Madsen D, Herrick S, Russell B. Measuring IT Sophistication in Nursing Homes. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 4: Technology and Medication Safety). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 August. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43764/ . Accessed April 16, 2018