Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Greater Accuracy and Precision to Plan Compared with Manual Techniques
Emily L. Hampp
1
Implant and Robotic Research, Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey
,
Morad Chughtai
2
Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Laura Y. Scholl
1
Implant and Robotic Research, Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey
,
Nipun Sodhi
3
Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
,
Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker
1
Implant and Robotic Research, Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey
,
David J. Jacofsky
4
Department of Adult Reconstruction, The CORE Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
,
Michael A. Mont
3
Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
› InstitutsangabenFunding This study was partially funded by an educational grant from Stryker. Three of the authors are employed by Stryker (E.L.H., L.Y.S., and M.B-S.). Three of the authors are paid consultants for Stryker (D.J.J., M.A.M., and M.C.).
This study determined if robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) allows for more accurate and precise bone cuts and component position to plan compared with manual total knee arthroplasty (MTKA). Specifically, we assessed the following: (1) final bone cuts, (2) final component position, and (3) a potential learning curve for RATKA. On six cadaver specimens (12 knees), a MTKA and RATKA were performed on the left and right knees, respectively. Bone-cut and final-component positioning errors relative to preoperative plans were compared. Median errors and standard deviations (SDs) in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes were compared. Median values of the absolute deviation from plan defined the accuracy to plan. SDs described the precision to plan. RATKA bone cuts were as or more accurate to plan based on nominal median values in 11 out of 12 measurements. RATKA bone cuts were more precise to plan in 8 out of 12 measurements (p ≤ 0.05). RATKA final component positions were as or more accurate to plan based on median values in five out of five measurements. RATKA final component positions were more precise to plan in four out of five measurements (p ≤ 0.05). Stacked error results from all cuts and implant positions for each specimen in procedural order showed that RATKA error was less than MTKA error. Although this study analyzed a small number of cadaver specimens, there were clear differences that separated these two groups. When compared with MTKA, RATKA demonstrated more accurate and precise bone cuts and implant positioning to plan.
5
Jinnah AH,
Multani A,
Jinnah RH,
Plate JF.
Robotic unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a commentary on a recently published level 1 study. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4 (Suppl. 01) S40
7
Longstaff LM,
Sloan K,
Stamp N,
Scaddan M,
Beaver R.
Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (04) 570-578
8
Rosso F,
Cottino U,
Olivero M,
Bonasia DE,
Bruzzone M,
Rossi R.
Medium-term follow-up of 149 mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties and evaluation of prognostic factors influencing outcomes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018; 26 (01) 2309499017754092
9
Anand S,
Harrison JWK,
Buch KA.
Extramedullary or intramedullary tibial alignment guides: a randomised, prospective trial of radiological alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (07) 1084
11
Bardakos N,
Cil A,
Thompson B,
Stocks G.
Mechanical axis cannot be restored in total knee arthroplasty with a fixed valgus resection angle: a radiographic study. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (06) (Suppl. 02) 85-89
13
Ritter MA,
Davis KE,
Meding JB,
Pierson JL,
Berend ME,
Malinzak RA.
The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
14
Harman MK,
Banks SA,
Kirschner S,
Lützner J.
Prosthesis alignment affects axial rotation motion after total knee replacement: a prospective in vivo study combining computed tomography and fluoroscopic evaluations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13 (01) 206
16
Matziolis G,
Krocker D,
Weiss U,
Tohtz S,
Perka C.
A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (02) 236-243
18
Manzotti A,
Pullen C,
Confalonieri N.
Computer-assisted alignment system for tibial component placement in total knee replacement: a radiological study. Chir Organi Mov 2008; 91 (01) 7-11
19
Ensini A,
Catani F,
Leardini A,
Romagnoli M,
Giannini S.
Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 457 (457) 156-162
20
Pang CH,
Chan WL,
Yen CH.
, et al. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2009; 17 (02) 170-173
23
Liow MHL,
Chin PL,
Tay KJD,
Chia SL,
Lo NN,
Yeo SJ.
Early experiences with robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the DigiMatch™ ROBODOC® surgical system. Singapore Med J 2014; 55 (10) 529-534
25
Marchand RC,
Sodhi N,
Khlopas A.
, et al. Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 849-853
26
Marchand R,
Khlopas A,
Sodhi N.
, et al. Difficult cases in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a case series. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 27-37
29
Jones B,
Blyth M,
MacLean A.
, et al. Accuracy of UKA Implant Positioning and Early Clinical Outcomes in a RCT Comparing Robotic Assisted and Manual Surgery. Presented at the CAOS International Conference, Orlando, FL, 2013
30
Plate JF,
Mofidi A,
Mannava S.
, et al. Achieving accurate ligament balancing using robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop 2013; 2013: 837167
31
Bukowski BR,
Anderson P,
Khlopas A,
Chughtai M,
Mont MA,
Illgen II RL.
Improved functional outcomes with robotic compared with manual total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 2016; XXIX: 303-308
32
Domb BG,
El Bitar YF,
Sadik AY,
Stake CE,
Botser IB.
Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 329-336
33
Illgen R.
Robotic Arm Assisted THA Improved Accuracy, Reproducibility, and Outcomes Compared to Conventional Technique. Presented at the 43rd Annual Course: Advances in Arthroplasty, Boston, MA, 2013
34
Jerabok SA,
Carroll KM,
Maratt JD.
, et al. Accuracy of Cup Positioning and Achieving Desired Hip Length and Offset Following Robotic THA. Presented at the CAOS International Conference, Orlando, FL, 2014
35
Bell SW,
Anthony I,
Jones B,
MacLean A,
Rowe P,
Blyth M.
Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (08) 627-635
36
van der List JP,
Chawla H,
Villa JC,
Zuiderbaan HA,
Pearle AD.
Early functional outcome after lateral UKA is sensitive to postoperative lower limb alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (03) 687-693
37
Elson L,
Dounchis J,
Illgen R.
, et al. Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2015; 25 (06) 531-536
38
Domb BG,
Redmond JM,
Louis SS.
, et al. Accuracy of component positioning in 1980 total hip arthroplasties: a comparative analysis by surgical technique and mode of guidance. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2208-2218
39
Heng H-YC,
Bin Abd Razak HR,
Mitra AK.
Radiographic grading of the patellofemoral joint is more accurate in skyline compared to lateral views. Ann Transl Med 2015; 3 (18) 263
41
Marchand RC,
Sodhi N,
Khlopas A.
, et al. Coronal correction for severe deformity using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 2-5
47
Sait KH.
Early experience with the da Vinci surgical system robot in gynecological surgery at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Int J Womens Health 2011; 3: 219-226