Check the Record: Remote CT Scans for Breast Flap Perforator Mapping

Abstract

Background Perforator mapping with computed tomography angiography (CTA) prior to autologous breast reconstruction reduces donor-site morbidity and operative time, but is costly. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre-existing CT scans could be used for dominant perforator identification before autologous reconstruction.

Methods We identified all female patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate or delayed breast reconstruction with abdominal free flaps at a single institution between 2006 and 2016. Medical records were reviewed to identify patients with pre-existing CT scans of the abdomen/pelvis. CT images were reviewed by the senior surgeon and ranked on a 1 to 3 scale to indicate utility for preoperative planning. An analysis was performed to assess financial savings and radiation avoidance associated with the use of pre-existing scans.

Results Of 301 identified patients, 44.9% (n = 135) had an available pre-existing CT. A dominant perforator was identified on 92.6% of scans. A higher proportion of dominant perforators was identified using positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans compared with CT scans with intravenous (IV) contrast and noncontrast CTs (p < 0.0001). Compared with PET/CTs and CTs with IV contrast, the average utility score for noncontrast CTs was lower (p = 0.0001). Dominant perforators were clearly identified in patients who had both a remote CT scan and a preoperative CTA. Perforator mapping using remote CT scans yielded a projected radiation reduction of 13.2 mGy per patient and yielded a projected annual U.S. health care savings of $28,459,638.

Conclusion Our study suggests that pre-existing CT scans represent a viable and economical alternative for perforator mapping before abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - cost savings - perforator mapping

• References

• 1 Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Grinsell D, Stella DL, Phillips TJ, Taylor GI. Establishing the case for CT angiography in the preoperative imaging of abdominal wall perforators. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (05) 306-313
• 2 Teunis T, Heerma van Voss MR, Kon M, van Maurik JF. CT-angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (06) 496-502
• 3 Smit JM, Dimopoulou A, Liss AG. , et al. Preoperative CT angiography reduces surgery time in perforator flap reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (09) 1112-1117
• 4 Rozen WM, Stella DL, Bowden J, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. Advances in the pre-operative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: magnetic resonance angiography. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (02) 119-123
• 5 Malhotra A, Chhaya N, Nsiah-Sarbeng P, Mosahebi A. CT-guided deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap localization -- better for the patient, the surgeon, and the hospital. Clin Radiol 2013; 68 (02) 131-138
• 6 Weum S, Mercer JB, de Weerd L. Evaluation of dynamic infrared thermography as an alternative to CT angiography for perforator mapping in breast reconstruction: a clinical study. BMC Med Imaging 2016; 16 (01) 43
• 7 Vasile JV, Newman T, Rusch DG. , et al. Anatomic imaging of gluteal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance angiography. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (01) 45-57
• 8 Ohkuma R, Mohan R, Baltodano PA. , et al. Abdominally based free flap planning in breast reconstruction with computed tomographic angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 483-494
• 9 Minqiang X, Lanhua M, Jie L, Dali M, Jinguo L. The value of multidetector-row CT angiography for pre-operative planning of breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric arterial perforator flaps. Br J Radiol 2010; 83 (985) 40-43
• 10 Masia J, Kosutic D, Cervelli D, Clavero JA, Monill JM, Pons G. In search of the ideal method in perforator mapping: noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (01) 29-35
• 11 Fukaya E, Kuwatsuru R, Iimura H, Ihara K, Sakurai H. Imaging of the superficial inferior epigastric vascular anatomy and preoperative planning for the SIEA flap using MDCTA. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (01) 63-68
• 12 Giunta RE, Geisweid A, Feller AM. The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (07) 2381-2386
• 13 Rozen WM, Palmer KP, Suami H. , et al. The DIEA branching pattern and its relationship to perforators: the importance of preoperative computed tomographic angiography for DIEA perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (02) 367-373
• 14 Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Stella DL, Phillips TJ, Grinsell D, Taylor GI. The accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for mapping the perforators of the deep inferior epigastric artery: a blinded, prospective cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1003-1009
• 15 Rosson GD, Williams CG, Fishman EK, Singh NK. 3D CT angiography of abdominal wall vascular perforators to plan DIEAP flaps. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (08) 641-646
• 16 Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Stella DL. , et al. The radiation exposure of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in DIEP flap planning: low dose but high impact. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (12) e654-e655
• 17 Rozen WM, Chubb D, Crossett M, Ashton MW. The future in perforator flap imaging: a new technique to substantially reduce radiation dose with computed tomographic angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (02) 98e-100e
• 18 Niumsawatt V, Debrotwir AN, Rozen WM. Reducing radiation dose without compromising image quality in preoperative perforator flap imaging with CTA using ASIR technology. Int Surg 2014; 99 (04) 485-491
• 19 Pratt GF, Rozen WM, Chubb D, Ashton MW, Alonso-Burgos A, Whitaker IS. Preoperative imaging for perforator flaps in reconstructive surgery: a systematic review of the evidence for current techniques. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (01) 3-9
• 20 Agrawal MD, Thimmappa ND, Vasile JV. , et al. Autologous breast reconstruction: preoperative magnetic resonance angiography for perforator flap vessel mapping. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (01) 1-11
• 21 Mayo-Smith WW, Morin RL. Image wisely: the beginning, current status, and future opportunities. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14 (03) 442-443
• 22 Groheux D, Cochet A, Humbert O, Alberini JL, Hindié E, Mankoff D. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for staging and restaging of breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2016; 57 (Suppl. 01) 17S-26S
• 23 Garcia JR, Pérez C, Bassa P, Capdevila L, Ramos F, Valenti V. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the staging and management of breast cancer: value in disease outcome and planning therapy. Clin Nucl Med 2017; 42 (03) 191-192
• 24 American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry. 2016. Available at: https://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/NRDR/DIR/DIRSampleReport.pdf . Accessed October 17, 2017
• 25 ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics. 2016. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2016/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2016.pdf . Accessed October 17, 2017
• 26 Piorkowski JR, DeRosier LC, Nickerson P, Fix RJ. Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (05) 534-536
• 27 Keys KA, Louie O, Said HK, Neligan PC, Mathes DW. Clinical utility of CT angiography in DIEP breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (03) e61-e65
• 28 Henry FP, Butler DP, Wood SH, Jallali N. Predicting and planning for SIEA flap utilisation in breast reconstruction: an algorithm combining pre-operative computed tomography analysis and intra-operative angiosome assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (06) 795-800
• 29 Offodile II AC, Chatterjee A, Vallejo S, Fisher CS, Tchou JC, Guo L. A cost-utility analysis of the use of preoperative computed tomographic angiography in abdomen-based perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 662e-669e
• 30 Buck AK, Herrmann K, Stargardt T, Dechow T, Krause BJ, Schreyögg J. Economic evaluation of PET and PET/CT in oncology: evidence and methodologic approaches. J Nucl Med Technol 2010; 38 (01) 6-17
• 31 Bernsdorf M, Berthelsen AK, Wielenga VT. , et al. Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23 (09) 2277-2282
• 32 Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Delord M. , et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer: comparison to conventional staging. J Nucl Med 2013; 54 (01) 5-11
• 33 Weeks WB. Medicare's bundled payment program and health care utilization. JAMA 2016; 315 (22) 2470-2471
• 34 See MS, Pacifico MD, Harley OJ, Francis I, Smith RW, Jones ME. Incidence of ‘Incidentalomas’ in over 100 consecutive CT angiograms for preoperative DIEP flap planning. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (01) 106-110
• 35 Ho OA, Bagher S, Jaskolka J. , et al. Incidentalomas associated with abdominal and pelvic CT angiograms for abdominal-based breast free flap reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (05) e97-e102
• 36 Agarwal S, Talia J, Liu PS, Momoh AO, Kozlow JH. Determining the cost of incidental findings for patients undergoing preoperative planning for abdominally based perforator free flap breast reconstruction with computed tomographic angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (05) 804e-810e