Yearb Med Inform 2008; 17(01): 29-32
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638579
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Health and Clinical Management - From Hospital to Home Patient Care Management

Findings from the Section on Health and Clinical Management
D. Kubias
1   Service of Medical Informatics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
Managing Editor for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Health and Clinical Management › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 March 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives To summarize last year’s excellent research in the field of heath and clinical management.

Method Synopsis of the best articles selected for the IMIA Yearbook 2008.

Results The selection process for this yearbook’s section on ‘Health and Clinical Management’ results in four excellent articles representing various topics of the field. These papers cover areas from inpatient managerial decision support to remote patient monitoring at their homes.

Conclusions Although these articles represent only a fraction of the worldwide work in the ‘Health and Clinical Management’ domain, they show promising strategies for contributing to improving the management of patient care.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dexter F, Epstein RH, Traub RD, Xiao Y. Making management decisions on the day of surgery based on operating room efficiency and patient waiting times. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 1444-53.
  • 2 McIntosh C, Dexter F, Epstein RH. Impact of ser- vice-specific staffing, case scheduling, turnovers, and first-case starts on anesthesia group and operating room productivity: tutorial using data from an Australian hospital. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 1499-516.
  • 3 Dexter F, Willemsen-Dunlap A, Lee JD. Operating Room Managerial Decision-Making on the Day of Surgery With and Without Computer Recommen- dations and Status Display. Anesth Analg 2007; 105 (02) 419-29.
  • 4 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RS, Watson RS, Nguyen TC. et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (06) 1506-12.
  • 5 Hsieh TC, Kuperman GJ, Jaggi T, Hojnowski-Diaz P, Fiskio J, Williams DH. et al. Characteristics and Consequences of Drug Allergy Alert Overrides in a Computerized Physician Order Entry System. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (06) 482-91.
  • 6 Abookire SA, Teich JM, Sandige H, Paterno MD, Martin MT, Kuperman GJ. et al. Improving Allergy Alerting in a Computerized Physician Order Entry System. Proc. AMIA Symp 2000; 2-6.
  • 7 Raebel MA, Charles J, Dugan J, Carroll NM, Korner EJ, Brand DW. et al. Randomized Trial to Improve Prescribing Safety in Ambulatory Elderly Patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55 (07) 977-85.
  • 8 Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, Murff HJ, Karson AS, Bates DW. “I Wish I Had Seen This Test Re- sult Earlier!” Dissatisfaction With Test Result Man- agement Systems in Primary Care. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (20) 2223-8.
  • 9 Matheny ME, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Ladak-Merchant Z, Bates DW, Kuperman GJ. et al. Impact of an Automated Test Result Management System on Patients’ Satisfaction About Test Result Commu- nication. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167 (20) 2233-9.
  • 10 Logan AG, McIssac WJ, Tisler A, Irvine MJ, Saunders A, Dunai A. et al. Mobile Phone-Based Remote Patient Monitoring System for Management of Hypertension in Diabetic Patients. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20 (09) 942-8.
  • 11 Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Kramer H, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Joffres MR. et al. Hypertension treatment and control in five European countries, Canada, and the United States. Hypertension 2004; 43: 10-17.