Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(02): 230-234
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636903
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Facial Asymmetry: Brow and Ear Position

Balaji Perumal
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
2   Montgomery and Riddle Eye Care, Clinton, South Carolina
,
Dale R. Meyer
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to analyze brow and ear position, and examine the relationship between these structures in patients presenting for blepharoplasty evaluation. A retrospective chart review was performed, which included all patients presenting to one oculoplastic physician for a blepharoplasty evaluation from November, 2012 to March, 2014. The prevalence of brow ptosis and brow and ear asymmetry was calculated; the proportional distribution was determined, and chi-square analysis and the z-test of proportions were used to calculate the significance. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. A total of 133 patients met the inclusion criteria. Some degree of brow ptosis was noted in 83% of patients. Brow asymmetry was found in 88% of patients, and ear asymmetry in 77%. Of those patients who had asymmetry, 61% had the right brow lower and 75% had the right ear lower; 73% of all patients had the brow and ear lower on the same side (p < 0.001). In this study, brow ptosis and asymmetry were quite common. In addition, the side of the lower brow correlated strongly with the side of the lower ear, and the right side structures were lower more often than the left. Patients presenting for blepharoplasty evaluation may have an element of generalized facial asymmetry which includes the brows and ears. These observations can be important for preoperative planning and patient counseling.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kwart DG, Foulsham T, Kingstone A. Age and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Perception 2012; 41 (08) 925-938
  • 2 American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS). 2014 AAFPRS Membership Study; February 2014. http://www.aafprs.org/wp-content/themes/aafprs/pdf/AAFPRS-2014-Report.pdf . Accessed February 6, 2018
  • 3 Katira K, Guyuron B. The deviated nose and asymmetric eyebrows: an important trap to avoid. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 519-523
  • 4 Macdonald KI, Mendez AI, Hart RD, Taylor SM. Eyelid and brow asymmetry in patients evaluated for upper lid blepharoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 43: 36
  • 5 Czyz CN, Hill RH, Foster JA. Preoperative evaluation of the brow-lid continuum. Clin Plast Surg 2013; 40 (01) 43-53
  • 6 Noel CL, Frodel JL. Eyebrow position recognition and correction in reconstructive and cosmetic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (01) 44-49
  • 7 Tiryaki T, Ciloglu NS. Eyebrow asymmetry: definition and symmetrical correction using botulinum toxin A. Aesthet Surg J 2007; 27 (05) 513-517
  • 8 Weissman JD, Most SP. Upper lid blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (01) 16-21
  • 9 Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2004; 117 (03) 313-332
  • 10 Kowner R. Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996; 22 (03) 662-675
  • 11 Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proc Biol Sci 1995; 261 (1360): 111-116
  • 12 Gunter JP, Antrobus SD. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 1808-1816
  • 13 Berlin NF, Berssenbrügge P, Runte C. , et al. Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis - a comparison of recent approaches. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (03) 265-271
  • 14 Dhir K, Lawson W, Binder WJ. Zonal analysis of facial asymmetry and its clinical significance in facial plastic surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (02) 110-112
  • 15 American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. White Paper on Functional Blepharoplasty, Blepharoptosis, and Brow Ptosis Repair; January 15, 2015
  • 16 Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (07) 1321-1333
  • 17 Flowers RS, Caputy GG, Flowers SS. The biomechanics of brow and frontalis function and its effect on blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1993; 20 (02) 255-268
  • 18 Costin BR, Plesec TP, Sakolsatayadorn N, Rubinstein TJ, McBride JM, Perry JD. Anatomy and histology of the frontalis muscle. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 31 (01) 66-72
  • 19 Karacalar A, Korkmaz A, Kale A, Kopuz C. Compensatory brow asymmetry: anatomic study and clinical experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (02) 119-123
  • 20 Lemke BN, Stasior OG. The anatomy of eyebrow ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 100 (06) 981-986
  • 21 Naif-de-Andrade NT, Hochman B, Naif-de-Andrade CZ, Ferreira LM. Computerized photogrammetry used to calculate the brow position index. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (05) 1047-1051
  • 22 Nishihira T, Ohjimi H, Eto A. A new digital image analysis system for measuring blepharoptosis patients' upper eyelid and eyebrow positions. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (02) 209-213
  • 23 Packiriswamy V, Kumar P, Bashour M. Photogrammetric analysis of eyebrow and upper eyelid dimensions in South Indians and Malaysian South Indians. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (07) 975-982
  • 24 Lu SM, Bartlett SP. On facial asymmetry and self-perception. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (06) 873e-881e