Study and Applications of an Informational Measure of Dependence in Survival Models

Abstract:

In survival models, when the factor of interest is a continuous variable or is expressed through a group of several variables, the classical measures of risk, i. e. relative risk and odds ratio, are not appropriate and there is no standard measure of dependence between survival and the considered factor. The Information Gain has been proposed by Linfoot (1957) and Kent (1983), giving any parametric model as a generalization of the squared product-moment correlation coefficient of the linear regression model with normal errors. By using simulation methods, we studied the statistical properties of the information gain as a measure of dependence, in the particular case of survival regression models. We suggest several efficient applications of this informational concept to some classical problems of regression analysis and prognostic analysis. Our ideas are illustrated through an example on the prognosis of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Key-Words

Information Gain - Measure of Dependence - Survival Models - Prognostic Analysis - Optimal Coding

• REFERENCES

• 1 Bruzzi P, Green SB, Byar DP, Brinton LA. et al. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Amer J Epidemiol 1985; 122: 904-14.
• 2 Benichou J, Gail MH. Estimate of absolute cause-specific risk in cohort studies. Biometrics 1990; 46: 813-26.
• 3 Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Statist 1951; 22: 79-86.
• 4 Kullback S. Information Theory and Statistics. New York: Dover; 1968
• 5 Linfoot EH. An informational measure of correlation. Information and Control 1957; 01: 85-9.
• 6 Kent JT. Information gain and a general measure of correlation. Biometrika 1983; 70: 163-73.
• 7 Kent JT, O’Quigley J. Measures of dependence for censored survival data. Biometrika 1988; 75: 525-34.
• 8 Clayton D, Cuzick J. Multivariate generalizations of the proportional hazards model. J R Statist Soc 1985; 148: 82-117.
• 9 Prentice RL. Linear rank tests with right censored data. Biometrika 1978; 65: 167-79.
• 10 Diciccio TJ, Romano JP. A review of bootstrap confidence intervals. J R Statist Soc 1988; 50: 338-54.
• 11 SAS Institute Inc. SAS Version 5. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1985
• 12 Gauss System Version 2.0. Aptech System Inc; 1988
• 13 Benichou J, Ben Abdallah M, Chastang C. Two methods for comparing staging systems in chronic disease. Abstracts of ISCB-10 1989; 111.
• 14 Komajda M, Jais JP, Reefes F, Goldfarb B. et al. Factors predicting mortality in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Europ Heart J 1990; 11: 824-31.
• 15 Lagakos SW, Schoenfeld DA. Properties of proportional-hazards score tests under mis-specified regression models. Biometrics 1984; 40: 1037-48.