Dilemmas at a Primary Health Care Center: a baseline study for Computer-Supported Cooperative Health Care Work

Abstract:

For the development of computer-supported cooperative health care work this study investigated, based upon activity theory, daily dilemmas encountered by the members of interprofessional primary health care work groups. The entire staff at four Swedish primary health care centers were surveyed, 199 personal interviews being conducted by the Critical Incident Technique. Medical dilemmas were mainly reported by general practitioners and nurses, organizational dilemmas by laboratory staff, nurses’ aides, and secretaries, and dilemmas in the patient-provider relation by nurses, nurses’ aides, and secretaries. Organizational and communication dilemmas reported by nurses, nurses’ aides, and secretaries often had their cause outside the control of the individual professional. These dilemmas were often “caused” by other group members (general practitioners or nurses), e.g., by not keeping appointment times or by not sharing information with patients. The implication for computer-supported cooperative health care work is that computer support should be planned on two levels. Collective work activity as a whole should benefit from individual clinical decision support for general practitioners and nurses. However, since most patient communication and organizational problems occurred at group level, group process support is required in these areas.

Key-Words

Computer Support - Cooperative Health Care Work - Primary Care - Activity Theory - Practice Research.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Grudin J. CSCW: the convergence of two developmental contexts. Proceedings of CHI ‘91. New Orleans: ACM Press; 1991: 91-8.
• 2 Greenberg S. Computer-supported Cooperative Work and Groupware. Int J Man-machine Studies 1991; 34: 133-41.
• 3 Applegate L, Ellis C, Holsapple CW, Radermacher FJ, Whinston AB. Organizational Computing: definitions and issues. J Org Comp 1991; 01: 1-10.
• 4 Engestroem Y. The emergence of learning activity as a historical form of human learning. In: Engestroem Y. ed. Learning by Expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit; 1987
• 5 Peterson OL, Andrews LP, Spain RS, Greenberg BG. An analytical study of North Carolina general practice 1953-1954. J Med Educ. 1956 31. part 2.
• 6 Difford F. Defining essential data for audit in general practice. Br Med J 1990; 300: 92-4.
• 7 Kern H, Schumann M. Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion. Munchen: Beck Verlag; 1984
• 8 Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 1954; 51: 327-58.
• 9 Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publ; 1980
• 10 Zinchenko VP, Gordon VM. Methodological problems in the psychological analysis of activity. In: Wertsch JV. The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. New York: Sharpe; 1981
• 11 Willis AW. Towards Comprehensive Information Systems for General Practices within the National Health Service (Soc Sci thesis). Birmingham: Faculty of Commerce and Social Science, University of Birmingham; 1989
• 12 De Sanctis G, Gallupe B. A foundation for a study of group decison support systems. Management Science 1987; 33: 585-609.
• 13 Bond J, Cartlidge AM, Gregson BA. et al. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 37: 158-61.
• 14 Gray-Toft PA, Anderson JG. Organizational stress in the hospital: development of a model for diagnosis and prediction. Health Serv Res 1985; 19: 753-80.
• 15 Waxman HM, Carner EA, Berkenstock G. Job turnover and job satisfaction among nursing home aids. The Gerontologist 1984; 24: 503-9.
• 16 James J, Milne DL, Firth H. A systematic comparison of feedback and staff discussion in changing the ward atmosphere. J Adv Nurs 1990; 15: 329-36.
• 17 Ellis CA, Gibbs SJ, Rein GL. Groupware. Some issues and experiences. CACM 1991; 34: 38-58.
• 18 Gale S. Human aspects of interactive multimedia communication. Interacting with computers 1990; 02: 175-89.
• 19 Heath C, Luff P. Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multimedia environment. Proceedings of CHI ‘91. New Orleans: ACM Press; 1991: 99-104.
• 20 Winograd T. A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Human Computer Interaction 1988; 03: 3-30.
• 21 Tatar DG, Foster G, Bobrow DG. Design for conversation: Lessons from Cognoter. In: Greenberg S. Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware. London: Academic Press; 1991: 55-79.
• 22 Timpka T, Arborelius E. The GP’s Dilemmas: A study of knowledge need and use during health care consultations. Meth Inf Med 1990; 29: 23-9.
• 23 Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG. et al. Physicians’ information needs: An analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching in internal medicine. Ann Int Med 1991; 141: 576-81.
• 24 Newble DI, Hejka EJ, Whelan G. The approaches to learning of specialist physicians. Med Educ 1990; 24: 101-9.
• 25 Geertsma RH, Parker RC, Krauss-Whit-bourne SK. How physicians view the process of change in their practice behavior. J Med Educ 1982; 57: 752-61.
• 26 Timpka T, Buur T. “Medical logic” and patient request in decision-making regarding female genitourinary infections. Meth Inf Med 1991; 30: 215-20.
• 27 McCloskey JC, McCain B. Nurse performance: strength and weaknesses. Nurs Res 1988; 37: 308-13.
• 28 Carnevali DL. Diagnostic Reasoning in Nursing. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1984
• 29 Arborelius E, Bremberg S, Timpka T. What is going on when the general practitioner doesn’t grasp the consultation?. Fram Pract 1991; 08: 3-9.
• 30 Salisbury CJ, Tettersell MJ. Comparison of the work of a nurse practitioner with that of a general practitioner. J R Coll Gen Pract 1988; 38: 314-6.
• 31 Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1985
• 32 Garfinkel H. What is ethnomethodology?. In: Garfinkel H. ed. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood: Prentice-Hall; 1967
• 33 Lindblom CE. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review. 1959 19. Spring issue.
• 34 Engestroem Y, Engestroem R. Developmental work research: the approach and an application in cleaning work. Nordisk Pedagogik 1986; 06: 2-15.