Networking in Shared Care – First Steps towards a Shared Electronic Patient Record for Cancer Patients

Summary

Objectives: This paper aims at identifying the data protection and security requirements for a cross-institutional EPR. Three possible models and the first steps towards a cross-institutional EPR for the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg and the Department of Clinical Radiology of the University Medical Center of Heidelberg shall be discussed.

Methods: A comprehensive analysis of literature and legal documents supplied information for determining the data protection and security requirements. By means of information system analysis, the technical preconditions in both institutions as well as three possible models towards a cross-institutional EPR were identified.

Results: According to the German penal code it is only allowed to reveal patient information to external physicians in cases of so-called “treatment connection”. An extension of the written consent, signed by the patient, verifying the patient agreement that his/her patient data will be stored in a cross-institutional EPR is needed. Among the three models that we identified, the model that constitutes of a virtual EPR with distributed data capture in both institutions was favored. By means of SecuRemote™ software a secure connection between the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg and the Department of Clinical Radiology was established, allowing the physicians to view the complete cross-institutional health information of a jointly treated patient during the weekly consultation on radiotherapy.

Conclusions: Many requirements listed in this paper are requirements for electronic patient records in general. Besides these general requirements there are specific requirements for a cross-institutional EPR. The legal situation in Germany complicates the development and implementation of a cross-institutional EPR. However, we think that the efforts are reasonable, because a cross-institutional EPR will be able to improve the communication between health institutions, medical disciplines and persons involved in shared care processes. It provides them with more complete health information about the jointly treated patients. A cross-institutional EPR is, therefore, expected to improve the quality of patient care.

Keywords

Electronic patient record - distributed architecture - networking - shared care

• REFERENCES

• 1 Blobel B, Holena M. Comparing middleware concepts for advanced healthcare system architectures. Int J Med Inf 1997; 46 (Suppl. 02) 69-85.
• 2 Klimczak JC, Witten DM, Ruiz M. et al. Providing location-independent access to patient clinical narratives using Web browsers and a tiered server approach. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Sym; 1996: 623-7.
• 3 Neame R. Creating an infrastructure for the productive sharing of clinical information. Top Health Inf Manage 2000; 20 (Suppl. 03) 85-91.
• 4 van Bemmel JH. Toward a virtual electronic patient record. MD Comput 1999; 16 (Suppl. 06) 20-1.
• 5 Forslund DW, Phillips RL, Kilman DG, Cook JL. Experiences with a distributed virtual patient record system. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996; 86 (Suppl. 01) 483-7.
• 6 Kittredge RL, Estey G, Pappas JJ, Barnett GO. Implementing a Web-based clinical information system using EMR middle layer services. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996; 19 1-2 628-32.
• 7 Smith E, Eloff JH. Security in health-care information systems – current trends. Int J Med Inf 1999; 54 (Suppl. 01) 39-54.
• 8 Blobel B, Pharow P. Results of European Projects Improving Security of Distributed Health Information Systems. In: Medinfo 98. 1998. IOS Press Amsterdam.;
• 9 Safran C, Goldberg H. Electronic patient records and the impact of the Internet. Int J Med Inf 2000; 60 (Suppl. 02) 77-83.
• 10 Gordon D, Geiger G, Lowe N, Jickling J. What is an electronic patient record?. Proc AMIA Symp 1998; 67 (Suppl. 11) 240-4.
• 11 Staccini P, Joubert M, Fieschi D, Fieschi M. Confidentiality Issues within a Clinical Information System: Moving from Data-driven to Event-driven Design. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38: 98-302.
• 12 Barrows R. PD.C. Privacy, confidentiality and electronic medical records. JAMIA 1996; 3 (Suppl. 02) 39-47.
• 13 Isaac S, Kohanne P, Greenspun J. et al. Building national electronic medical record systems via the world wide web. J Am Medical Informatics Association 1996; 3: 191-207.
• 14 Forslund D, Kilman D. An international collaboratory based on virtual patient records. Communications of the ACM 1997; 40: 111-7.
• 15 Malamateniou F, Vassilacopoulos G, Mantas J. A search engine for virtual patient records. Int J Medical Informatics 1999; 55: 103-15.
• 16 http://www.krz.uni-heidelberg.de/dsb/hand-buch.htm Nov. 2001
• 17 Winter A, Haux R. A three-level graph-based model for the management of hospital information systems. Methods Inf Med 1995; 34 (Suppl. 04) 378-96.
• 18 Berkowicz DA, Barnett GO, Chueh HC. Component architecture for web based EMR applications. Proc AMIA Symp 1998; 403 6768 116-20.
• 19 Wang C, Ohe K. A CORBA-based object framework with patient identification translation and dynamic linking. Methods for exchanging patient data. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38 (Suppl. 01) 56-65.
• 20 Alkhateeb A, Singer H, Yakami M, Takahashi T. An end-to-end secure patient information access card system. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39 (Suppl. 01) 70-2.
• 21 Moehr JR. Privacy and security requirements of distributed computer based patient records. Int J Biomed Comput 1994; 35 Suppl (Suppl. 02) 57-64.