Fetal Heart Rate Variability due to Vibroacoustic Stimulation: Linear and Nonlinear Contribution

Summary

Objectives: This work aims at characterizing the variation of fetal heart rate (FHR) provoked by vibro-acoustic stimulation (VAS). The FHR signal is analyzed by means of a multiparametric approach consisting of linear and nonlinear indices.

Methods: The FHR signals of 13 fetuses were collected through a US standard CTG monitor (HP1351A) and were sampled at a frequency of 2 Hz. The VAS was provided after a period of quiet of 10 minutes. The analysis was performed on the quiet period and on two successive time windows of 10 minutes each, after the stimulation. FHR classical parameters (delta, short term variability, long term irregularity, accelerations and decelerations) as well as power spectral density (PSD) and approximate entropy (ApEn) were computed for each period.

Results: Results confirm that there is a significant change in fetal conditions after the stimulus is applied. This change can be clearly observed either in time domain parameters and in the regularity index (ApEn). Individual data are all consistent with an increase of variability and a decrease of regularity after VAS.

Conclusions: The obtained results give further strength to the hypothesis that vibratory stimuli tests represent a reliable method for monitoring the neural development of the fetus during pregnancy.

Keywords

Fetal heart rate - vibroacoustic stimulation - multipara-metric analysis

• References

• 1 Lambertz M, Langhorst P. Simultaneous changes of rhythmic organization in brainstem neurons, respiration, cardiovascular system and EEG between 0.05 Hz and 0.5 Hz. J Auton Nerv Syst 1998; 19 (68) (1-2) 58-77.
• 2 Task Force of the Europ Soc of Cardiol & North Am Soc of Pacing and Electrophys. Heart Rate Variability, standard of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 1996; 93: 1043-65.
• 3 Gagnon R, Foreman J, Hunse C, Patrick J. Effects of low-frequency vibration on human term fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 1479-85.
• 4 Van-Geijn HP. Developments in CTG analysis. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 10 (02) 185-209.
• 5 Parer WJ, Parer JT, Holbrook RH, Block BSB. Validity of mathematical methods of quantitating fetal heart rate variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153 (04) 402-9.
• 6 Signorini MG, De Angelis A, Magenes G, Sassi R, Arduini D, Cerutti S. Classification of fetal pathologies through fuzzy inference systems based on a multiparametric analysis of fetal heart rate. Computers in Cardiology. 2000. Boston: 435-8.
• 7 Pietrantoni M, Angel JL, Parsons MT, McClain L, Arango HA, Spellacy WN. Human fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation as a function of stimulus duration. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78 (5 pt 1) 807-11.
• 8 Signorini MG, Magenes G, Cerutti S, Arduini D. Linear and Nonlinear Parameters for the Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate Signal from Cardiotocographic Recordings. IEEE Trans Biom Eng 2003; 50 (03) 365-75.
• 9 Picus SM. Approximate entropy (ApEn) as a complexity measure. Chaos 1995; 5: 110-17.
• 10 Gagnon R. et al. Patterns of fetal heart rate accelerations from 26 weeks to term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 743-8.
• 11 Lecanuet JP, Schaal B. Fetal sensory competencies. Eur J Obstet & Gynecol 1996; 68: 1-23.
• 12 van Heteren CF, Boekkooi PF, Jongsma HW, Nijhuis JG. The Response to repeated vibroacoustic stimulation in a fetus with trisomy 18. Eur J Obstet & Gynecol 2001; 96: 123-5.