Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16(03): 127-131
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632768
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

The influence of epidural anaesthesia on femoral overlap and Norberg angle in the hip joint of young dysplastic dogs

P. M. F. P. Vandekerckhove
1   Veterinary small animal clinic ANUBIS, Aartselaar, Antwerp, Belgium
,
L. A. A. Janssens
1   Veterinary small animal clinic ANUBIS, Aartselaar, Antwerp, Belgium
,
B. C. W. Ballieu
1   Veterinary small animal clinic ANUBIS, Aartselaar, Antwerp, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 18 November 2001

Accepted 15 January 2003

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

Summary

A retrospective study of 61 dogs that underwent triple pelvic osteotomy evaluated the effect of the epidural anaesthesia on the hip laxity as measured by the femoral overlap and Norberg angle before and after epidural anaesthesia. Both the femoral overlap and the Norberg angle measured on the non-operated hip decreased significantly after epidural anaesthesia. (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

 
  • References

  • 1 Adams WM, Tass RDueland, Meinen J, O’Brien RT, Giuliano E, Nordheim EV. Early detection of canine hip dysplasia: Comparison of two palpation and five radiographic methods. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998; 34: 339-47.
  • 2 Adams WM, Dueland TR, Daniels R, Fialkowski J, Nordheim EV. Comparison of two palpation, four radiographic and three ultrasound methods for early detection of mild to moderate canine hip dysplasia. Vet. Radiol and Utrasound 2000; 41: 484-90.
  • 3 Adams WM. Radiographic diagnosis of hip dysplasia in the young dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30: 267-79.
  • 4 Aronson E, Kraus KH, Smith J. The effect of anaesthesia on the radiographic appearance of the coxofemoral joints. Vet Radiol 1991; 32: 25.
  • 5 Beck KA, Erb HN, Tapley K. Effect of sagittal plane positioning errors on measurement of the angle of inclination in dogs. Vet Surg 1992; 21: 332-6.
  • 6 Chalman JA, Butler HC. Coxofemoral laxity and the Ortolani sign. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1985; 21: 671-6.
  • 7 Corley EA. Role of the orthopaedic foundation for animals in the control of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 579-93.
  • 8 Corley EA. Chemical restraint for true evaluation of hip status in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 1385.
  • 9 Deleu T. The influence of positioning on the radiographic diagnosis of hip dysplasia. Thesis 2000, University of Ghent, Faculty of veterinary medicine.
  • 10 Farese JP, Lust G, Williams AJ, Dykes NL, Todhunter RJ. Comparison of measurements of dorsolateral subluxation of the femoral head and maximal passive laxity for evaluation of the coxofemoral joint in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 1571-6.
  • 11 Farrow CS, Black RT. Radiographic evaluation of non-anaesthetized and non-sedated dogs for hip dysplasia. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 524-6.
  • 12 Fluckiger MA, Friedrich GA, Binder H. Correlation between hip joint laxity and subsequent coxarthrosis in dogs. Zentralbl. Veterinarmed 1998; 45: 199-207.
  • 13 Fry TR, Clark DM. Canine hip dysplasia: clinical signs and physical diagnosis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 551-8.
  • 14 Hazewinkel HAW. Examination of Radiographs: question and answer. Tijdschr.voor Diergeneeskunde 1997; 10: 283-5.
  • 15 Henninger W, Köppel E. Die Bedeutung des kraniolateralen Pfannenrandes für die HDBeurteilung. Tierärztl Prax 1994; 22: 278-85.
  • 16 Henry GA. Radiographic development of canine dysplasia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 559-77.
  • 17 Janssens L, Coppens P, Moens Y. De bekkenkanteling als behandeling van heupdysplasie bij de hond: vooronderzoek, indicaties en methoden. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 1998; 67: 214-22.
  • 18 Janssens LJ, Moens Y, Coppens P, Vinck H. A follow up study of dogs with hip dysplasia and hip joint laxity treated by triple pelvic osteotomy. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 2001; 70: 36-43.
  • 19 Kealy JK. Hip Dysplasia. In: Kealy JK. Diagnostic radiology of the dog and the cat. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1979: 269.
  • 20 Lust G, Williams AJ, Burton-Wurster N, Pijanowski G, Beck KA, Rubin G, Smith GK. Joint laxity and its association with hip dysplasia in Labrador retrievers. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1990-9.
  • 21 Mc Laughlin Jr R, Miller CW. Evaluation of hip congruence and range of motion before and after triple pelvic osteotomy. VCOT 1991; 03: 65-9.
  • 22 Madsen JS, Svalastoga E. Effect of anaesthesia and stress on the radiographic evaluation of the coxofemoral joint. J Small Anim Pract 1991; 32: 64-8.
  • 23 Morgan JP, Wind A, Davidson AP. Hip dysplasia. In: Morgan JP. Hereditary bone and joint diseases in the dog. Hannover: Schlütersche; 2000: 118-56.
  • 24 Slocum B, Devine-Slocum T. Pelvic osteotomy for axial rotation of the acetabular segment in dogs with hip dysplasia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 645-82.
  • 25 Slocum B, Devine-Slocum T. “Physical examination of the hip”. In: Bojrab MG. Current techniques in small animal surgery. 4th . edition.?((Place)): Williams & Wilkins; 1998: 1136-45.
  • 26 Smith GK, Biery DN, Gregor TP. New concepts of coxofemoral joint stability and the development of a clinical stress-radiographic method for quantitating hip joint laxity in the dog. J Am Vet Med Ass 1990; 196: 59-70.
  • 27 Smith KGail, Lafond E, Heyman SJ, Cofone MA, Gregor TP. Biomechanical characterisation of passive laxicity of the hip joints in dogs. Am. J Vet Res 1997; 58 (10) 1078-82.