PDF herunterladen
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15(04): 210-214
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632741
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Mechanical comparison of six loop fixation methods with monofilament nylon leader line

L. E. Peycke
1   Louisiana State University, School of Veterinary Medicine,Baton Rouge, LA, USA
,
S. C. Kerwin
2   Texas A&M University, College of Veterinary Medicine, College Station, TX, USA
,
G. Hosgood
1   Louisiana State University, School of Veterinary Medicine,Baton Rouge, LA, USA
,
J. B. Metcalf
3   Louisiana State University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
› InstitutsangabenThe authors acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Bruce A. Smith (Northern Sydney Veterinary Specialist Centre, New South Wales, Australia) to the initiation of this study.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 20. Dezember 2001

Accepted 06. März 2002

Publikationsdatum:
08. Februar 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Monofilament nylon leader line (MNL) is a popular prosthetic material used by veterinary surgeons for extra-capsular cranial cruciate ligament repair. Careful examination of MNL fixation methods has been reported, but a comprehensive comparison has not been done. This study evaluated three unpublished novel methods of MNL loop fixation [Harris wire tightener (knotter), Securos® crimp clamp system, self-locking knot] to traditional methods of MNL loop fixation (clamped square knot, sliding half hitch knot). Loops (27.3 kgt and 36.4 kgt) were distracted at 500 mm/min until failure by breaking or slipping. Ultimate force, elongation and stiffness were used for comparison of loop fixation methods. All of the loops failed by breaking within 3.0 mm of knot or clamp. The Harris knotter had significantly greater elongation than all other loops, except for the self-locking knot. The self-locking knot required the most force to failure; however, it was not superior if the doublestranded configuration was considered. If the mechanical properties of the knot method is considered in light of the subjective handling characteristics, the Securos® crimp clamp system had equivalent strength measurement for the 27.3 kgt MNL loops and was stronger than traditional methods using the 36.4 kgt MNL. The Securos® system recommends use of the larger diameter MNL and it allows a surgeon to overcome potential difficult handling characteristics previously encountered with knot formation and security.

Keywords

Ligatures - nylon
 

  • References

  • 1 Anderson 3rd CC, Tomlinson JL, Dalv WR, Carson WL, Payne JT, Wagner-Mann CC. Biomechanical evaluation of a crimp clamp system for loop fixation of monofilament nylon leader material used for stabilization of the canine stifle joint. Vet Sur 1998; 27 (06) 533-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arnoczky SP, Marshall JL. The cruciate ligaments of the canine stifle: an anatomical and functional analysis. Am J Vet Res 1977; 38 (11) 1807-14.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Butler DL, Hulse DA, Kay MD. et al. Biomechanics of cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in the dog II. Mechanical properties. Vet Surg 1983; 12 (03) 113-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Caporn TM, Roe SC. Biomechanical evaluation of the suitability of monofilament nylon fishing and leader line for extra-articular stabilisation of the canine cruciate-deficient stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09: 126-33.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cheng SL, Smith TJ, Davey JR. A comparison of the strength and stability of six techniques of cerclage wire fixation for fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1993; 07 (03) 221-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 DeAngelis M, Lau RE. A lateral retinacular imbrication technique for the surgical correction of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970; 157 (01) 79-84.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Huber DJ, Egger EL, James SP. The effect of knotting method on the structural properties of large diameter nonabsorbable monofilament sutures. Vet Surg 1999; 28 (04) 260-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Korvick DL, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ. Surgeons’ preferences in treating cranial cruciate ligament ruptures in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205 (09) 1318-24.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lewis DD, Milthorpe BK, Bellenger CR. Mechanical comparison of materials used for extra-capsular stabilisation of the stifle joint in dogs. Aust Vet J 1997; 75 (12) 890-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lucas GL, Cooke FW, Friis EA. A Primer of Biomechanics. Lucas GL. ed. New York: Springer; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Magilligan Jr. DJ, DeWeese JA. Knot security and synthetic suture materials. Am J Surg 1974; 127 (03) 355-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 McCarthy RJ. Advances in Surgical Repair of the Cranial Cruciate Ligament: Extracapsular Techniques. 138th American Veterinary Medical Association Annual Convention. Boston: AVMA; 2001: 431-2.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 McKee WM, Miller A. A self-locking knot for lateral fabellotibial suture stabilisation of the cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 78-80.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nwadike BS, Roe SC. Mechanical comparison of suture material and knot type used for fabello-tibial sutures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1998; 11: 47-52.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Patterson RH, Smith GK, Gregor TP, Newton CD. Biomechanical stability of four cranial cruciate ligament repair techniques in the dog. Vet Surg 1991; 20 (02) 85-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Brinker, Piermattei, and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture Repair. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1997: 534-48.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Rosin E, Robinson GM. Knot security of suture materials. Vet Surg 1989; 18 (04) 269-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shaw JA, Daubert HB. Compression capability of cerclage fixation systems. A biomechanical study. Orthopaedics 1988; 11 (08) 1169-74.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Vasseur PB, Pool RR, Arnoczky SP, Lau RE. Correlative biomechanical and histologic study of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46 (09) 1842-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar